| Literature DB >> 35202314 |
Martina Bini1, Tommaso Vezzosi1,2, Maria Josefa Fernández Del Palacio3, Jesús Talavera3, Valentina Patata1, Federica Marchesotti1, Oriol Domenech1.
Abstract
Pulmonary valve stenosis (PS) in dogs is usually suspected due to the presence of a heart murmur and clinical signs. Echocardiography is needed to confirm the diagnosis and define the severity of PS. This retrospective study evaluated the utility of clinical and electrocardiographic (ECG) findings in the prediction of PS severity. Data regarding heart murmur and ECG analysis were gathered. Ninety-seven dogs with PS were included. A murmur grade ≥IV/VI was predictive of severe PS (area under curve (AUC) = 0.71; sensitivity (Se) = 95%; specificity (Sp) = 33%; p = 0.003). In lead II, P wave amplitude >0.35 mV (AUC = 0.67; Se = 31%; Sp = 100%; p = 0.038), Q wave < 0.15 mV (AUC = 0.70; Se = 70%; Sp = 59%; p = 0.0015), R wave < 0.87 mV (AUC = 0.66; Se = 67%; Sp = 69%; p = 0.006), and S wave > 0.37 mV (AUC = 0.80; Se = 72%; Sp = 85%; p < 0.0001) were predictive of severe PS. The extent of right deviation of the mean electrical axis of the QRS complex was correlated with the pulmonary pressure gradient (r = 0.648; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, a systolic murmur with intensity ≥IV/VI, a P wave amplitude >0.35 mV, low amplitude of Q and R waves, deep S waves in lead II, and right axis deviation of the QRS complex in a young dog are predictive of severe PS.Entities:
Keywords: QRS complex; cardiology; electrocardiography; heart murmur; mean electrical axis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35202314 PMCID: PMC8877586 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9020061
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Sci ISSN: 2306-7381
Electrocardiographic findings in 97 dogs with pulmonary valve stenosis according to severity.
| Electrocardiographic Findings | PS Severity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild (n = 15) | Moderate (n = 24) | Severe (n = 58) | ||
| Heart rate (bpm) | 129 (±31) | 130 (±31) | 126 (±36) | 0.62 |
| Rhythm | Sinus rhythm (n = 14) | Sinus rhythm (n = 22) | Sinus rhythm (n = 50) | 0.33 |
| P wave amplitude (mV) | 0.2 (0.1–0.2) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | 0.3 (0.1–0.6) | 0.03 |
| QRS complex duration (ms) | 49 (±12) | 52 (±9) | 51 (30–93) | 0.56 |
| Q wave amplitude (mV) | 0.4 (±0.2) | 0.1 (0–0.9) | 0 (0–1.2) | 0.0007 |
| R wave amplitude (mV) | 1.2 (±0.6) | 1 (±0.5) | 0.7 (0–2.7) | 0.006 |
| S wave amplitude (mV) | 0 (0–0.3) | 0.05 (0–2.3) | 1 (0–4.6) | <0.0001 |
| Corrected MEA of the QRS (°) | 75 (24–225) | 86 (43–253) | 180 (45–270) | <0.0001 |
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; APCs, atrial premature complexes; bpm, beats per minute; MEA, mean electrical axis; ms, milliseconds; mV, millivolt; PG, peak transvalvular pulmonary pressure gradient PS: pulmonic stenosis; VPCs, ventricular premature complexes; °, degrees. Note: Normally distributed data are presented as mean (± standard deviation), non-normally distributed data are presented as median (range). p-value represents the comparison of mild-to-moderate PS with severe PS. Values in bold denote statistical significance.
Figure 1Distribution of pulmonary valve stenosis severity across different heart murmur intensities.
Figure 2Six-lead electrocardiogram of a dog with severe pulmonary valve stenosis (peak transvalvular pulmonary pressure gradient: 114 mmHg) demonstrating sinus arrhythmia with a mean heart rate of 120 bpm, a P wave amplitude of 0.35 mV, a RS morphology of QRS complex in lead II, and right deviation of the mean electrical axis (−135°). Paper speed = 50 mm/s; 10 mm/mV.
Figure 3Positive correlation between S wave amplitude in lead II and pulmonary pressure gradient. Black dots are representing the study population.
Figure 4Positive correlation between the corrected MEA and pulmonary pressure gradient. Black dots are representing the study population.