| Literature DB >> 35202199 |
Maurizio Antonarelli1, Marco Fogante2.
Abstract
Background: sarcopenia is a predictor of unfavorable outcomes, but its prognostic impact on patients with COVID-19 is not well known. To evaluate the association between the chest computed tomography (CT) derived muscle analysis of sarcopenia and clinical-radiological outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; CT; CT-derived muscle analysis; intensive care unit; pneumonia; sarcopenia
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35202199 PMCID: PMC8878548 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8010034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tomography ISSN: 2379-1381
Clinical features of the study population.
| Features | All Patients ( | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 60.5 ± 11.4 | |
|
| ||
| Male | 82 (73.2%) | |
| Female | 25 (22.8%) | |
|
| ||
| Fever | 77 (68.8%) | |
| Cough | 61 (54.5%) | |
| Dyspnea | 35 (39.2%) | |
| Myalgia or fatigue | 46 (41.1%) | |
|
| ||
| Hypertension | 33 (29.5%) | |
| Congestive heart failure | 27 (24.1%) | |
| Diabetes | 28 (25.0%) | |
| Chronic lung disease | 25 (22.3%) | |
| Obesity | 32 (28.6%) | |
| Smoking History | 25 (22.3%) | |
| Tumor History | 20 (17.9%) | |
CT-derived muscle analysis comparison in clinical and radiological features.
| Features | Number of Patients | PMA (cm2) | PMD (HU) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Low (<7) | 56 (50%) | 40.4 ± 9.8 | 29.2 ± 5.9 |
| High (>7) | 56 (50%) | 38.9 ± 7.8 | 27.8 ± 5.2 |
| 0.3721 | 0.1856 | ||
|
| |||
| Short (<19) | 56 (50%) | 41.6 ± 8.7 | 30.2 ± 6.2 |
| Long (>19) | 56 (50%) | 37.2 ± 6.7 | 26.1 ± 4.9 |
| 0.0034 | 0.0002 | ||
|
| |||
| Successful | 77 (68.8%) | 42.1 ± 7.9 | 28.2 ± 5.7 |
| Failure | 35 (31.3%) | 37.8 ± 6.4 | 27.1 ± 5.3 |
| 0.0056 | 0.3295 | ||
|
| |||
| No | 83 (74.1%) | 39.9 ± 8.1 | 28.4 ± 5.6 |
| Yes | 29 (25.9%) | 39.1 ± 7.8 | 26.9 ± 5.2 |
| 0.6449 | 0.2089 | ||
Abbreviations—PSS: pneumonia severity index; ICU: intensive care unit; PMA: pectoral muscle area; PMD: pectoral muscle density; HU: Hounsfield Unit.
Figure 1(A–C) 56-year-old male with COVID-19.
Figure 2(A,B) 58-year-old female with COVID-19.
Figure 3(A,B). 63-year-old male with COVID-19.