| Literature DB >> 35202136 |
Ahmed Noah Badr1, Marwa M El-Attar2, Hatem S Ali3, Manal F Elkhadragy4, Hany M Yehia5,6, Amr Farouk7.
Abstract
Spent coffee grounds (SCGs), which constitute 75% of original coffee beans, represent an integral part of sustainability. Contamination by toxigenic fungi and their mycotoxins is a hazard that threatens food production. This investigation aimed to examine SCGs extract as antimycotic and anti-ochratoxigenic material. The SCGs were extracted in an eco-friendly way using isopropanol. Bioactive molecules of the extract were determined using the UPLC apparatus. The cytotoxicity on liver cancer cells (Hep-G2) showed moderate activity with selectivity compared with human healthy oral epithelial (OEC) cell lines but still lower than the positive control (Cisplatin). The antibacterial properties were examined against pathogenic strains, and the antifungal was examined against toxigenic fungi using two diffusion assays. Extract potency was investigated by two simulated models, a liquid medium and a food model. The results of the extract showed 15 phenolic acids and 8 flavonoids. Rosmarinic and syringic acids were the most abundant phenolic acids, while apigenin-7-glucoside, naringin, epicatechin, and catechin were the predominant flavonoids in the SCGs extract. The results reflected the degradation efficiency of the extract against the growth of Aspergillus strains. The SCGs recorded detoxification in liquid media for aflatoxins (AFs) and ochratoxin A (OCA). The incubation time of the extract within dough spiked with OCA was affected up to 2 h, where cooking was not affected. Therefore, SCGs in food products could be applied to reduce the mycotoxin contamination of raw materials to the acceptable regulated limits.Entities:
Keywords: aflatoxins; anti-mycotoxigenic; antifungal; cytotoxicity; degradation; detoxification; flavonoids; phenolic acids; simulated media; spent coffee grounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35202136 PMCID: PMC8876227 DOI: 10.3390/toxins14020109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Contents of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and caffeine determined in SCGs isopropanol extract.
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Gallic acid | 18.15 ± 0.63 | Sinapic acid | 17.05 ± 0.54 |
| Protocatechuic acid | 0.82 ± 0.04 | (S)-(-)-rosmarinic acid | 0.92 ± 0.02 |
| p-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 3.65 ± 0.09 | Ferulic acid | 3.64 ± 0.17 |
| Gentisic acid | 8.6 ± 0.13 | Salicylic acid | 12.67 ± 0.27 |
| Chlorogenic acid | 7.38 ± 0.31 | p-coumaric acid | 0.19 ± 0.03 |
| Caffeic acid | 7.2 ± 0.73 | Cinnamic acid | 0.495 ± 0.06 |
| Syringic acid | 64.14 ± 0.83 | (R)-(+)-rosmarinic acid | 176.43 ± 1.27 |
| Vanillic acid | 0.47 ± 0.06 | - | - |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Catechin | 16.86 ± 0.27 | Quercetin | 1.38 ± 0.05 |
| Epicatechin | 53.83 ± 1.02 | Apigenin-7-glucoside | 1717.04 ± 3.54 |
| Rutin | 4.87 ± 0.11 | Kaempferol | 3.18 ± 0.41 |
| Naringin | 74.49 ± 0.69 | Chrysin | 1.34 ± 0.18 |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
| Caffeine | 208.93 ± 2.05 | ||
The data were expressed as means ±SEM (where n = 3, LSD = 0.704, p ≤ 0.05); SEM: standard error means; LSD: least significant differences;.SCGs: spent coffee grounds,.
Cytotoxic activity of SCGs isopropanol extract against HepG2 and OEC cell lines using MTT and SRB assays.
| Extract | Cell Lines | IC50 (μg/mL) | SI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisplatin | HepG2 | 66.69 | 1.3 |
| OEC | 87.69 | - | |
| Isoprpanol extract | HepG2 | 112 | 1.2 |
| OEC | 133.7 | - | |
| Isopropanol extract | HepG2 | 94.03 | 1.85 |
| OEC | 174.1 | - |
For the MTT test: the value of the LSD was (4.542); R2 = 0.9912. For the SRB test: the value of the LSD was (3.139); R2 = 0.995; IC50: the half-maximal inhibitory concentratio; SI: selectivity index.
Figure 1Antibacterial potency determined for the SCGs isopropanol extract against pathogenic strains of bacteria.
Figure 2Antifungal impact determined for the SCGs isopropanol extract against toxigenic fungal strains using two assays.
Figure 3Reduction in fungal growth of two toxins producing Aspergillus strains using the SCGs extract.
Reduction in aflatoxins and Ochratoxin A produced by Aspergillus toxin-producing strains using the graduated concentrations of the SCGs extract.
| Concentration | AFB1 | AFB2 | AFG1 | AFG2 | OCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 258.0 ±1 4.55 a | 184.0 ± 15.17 a | 208.3 ± 14.82 a | 175.7 ± 12.37 a | 910.7 ± 16.77 a |
| 0.5 | 194.3 ± 13.09 b | 138.3 ± 13.81 b | 174.3 ± 14.26 b | 148.0 ± 12.19 b | 612.6 ± 17.05 b |
| 1 mg | 141.4 ± 13.14 c | 103.7 ± 13.69 c | 118.3 ± 13.37 c | 94.6 ± 10.57 c | 257.7 ± 15.22 c |
| 2 mg | 132.0 ± 12.88 cd | 99.0 ± 11.74 cd | 103.6 ± 12.07 d | 86.3 ± 11.77 cd | 226.8 ± 14.14 d |
| 4 mg | 119.3 ± 16.23 d | 88.3 ± 11.81 d | 98.7 ± 12.54 d | 79.0 ± 11.41 d | 201.0 ± 13.79 e |
The results are represented as means ± SD, where (n = 3; p ≤ 0.05); SD: Standard Deviation). AFB1: aflatoxin B1; AFB2: aflatoxin B2; AFG1: aflatoxin G1; AFG2: aflatoxin G2; OCA: ochratoxin A. The values represented by different superscripted letters are significantly different for the same coulumn.
Spiked Ochratoxin A reduction in a simulated model of contaminated brownies fortified by the SCGs extract.
| Control | 1 mg * | 3 mg * | 5 mg * | 7 mg * | 10 mg * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero-time | 850 ± 13.14 a | 837 ± 18.54 a | 817 ± 17.63 a | 811 ± 19.05 a | 796 ± 17.49 a | 779 ± 15.17 a |
| 2 h incubation | 852 ± 14.56 a | 742 ± 13.79 b | 711 ± 19.13 b | 671 ± 18.21 b | 524 ± 17.71 b | 319 ± 27.64 b |
| 4 h incubation | 851 ± 12.81 a | 737 ± 11.27 b | 691 ± 16.23 b | 588 ± 28.34 c | 502 ± 26.25 b | 307 ± 37.57 b |
| After cooking | 836 ± 17.37 a | 731 ± 10.91 b | 689 ± 15.84 b | 574 ± 27.77 c | 495 ± 26.84 b | 282 ± 33.93 b |
The results are represented as means ± SD, where (n = 3; p ≤ 0.05; SD: Standard Deviation). The values represented by different superscripted letters are significantly different. (*) refers to the concentration of spent extract applied in the dough.