| Literature DB >> 35201518 |
Sepideh Barzin Tond1, Laurent Balenci2, Nasim Khajavirad3, Mohammadreza Salehi4, Abbas Tafakhori5, Mohammad Reza Shahmohammadi6, Fereshteh Ghiasvand4, Sirous Jafari4, Sara Abolghasemi7, Farzad Mokhtari2, Somayyeh Mahmoodi Baram2,8, Tayebe Zarei8, Davood Kazemi4, Esmaeil Mohammadnejad9, Akram Shah-Hosseini1, Alireza Haghbin Toutounchi1, Soudabeh Fallah10, Ali Riazi2, Saeed Karima11.
Abstract
AIMS: COVID-19 is a significant global threat to public health. Despite the availability of vaccines and anti-viral drugs, there is an urgent need for alternative treatments to help prevent and/or manage COVID-19 symptoms and the underlying dysregulated immune response. We hypothesized that administration of Inflawell® syrup, a Boswellia extract formulation enriched for boswellic acids (BAs), can reduce the excessive or persistent inflammation and thereby prevent disease progression. BAs are medicinally activated triterpenoids found in the resins of Boswellia spp., and possess an immense therapeutic potential due to their anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory activities. We investigated the effect of Inflawell® syrup, on moderate COVID-19 patients along with the current standard of care treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Boswellic acids; COVID-19; Clinical trial; Inflammation; Inflawell® syrup; NLR
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35201518 PMCID: PMC8867130 DOI: 10.1007/s10787-022-00928-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Inflammopharmacology ISSN: 0925-4692 Impact factor: 5.093
Fig. 1Flow diagram of participants in a Randomized Clinical Trial of BAs group vs placebo group
Demographical characteristics, and comorbidities of the patients at baseline
| BAs group ( | Placebo group ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Agea | 51.92 ± 2.66, (31–76) | 55.84 ± 2.48, (35–78) |
| Male—no. (%)b | 10 (40) | 16 (64) |
| Female—no. (%)b | 15 (60) | 9 (36) |
BMI (kg/m2)a BMI ≥ 30—no. (%)b | 27.58 ± 0.71 5 (20) | 28.05 ± 0.57 7 (28) |
| Hypertension—no. (%)b | 6 (24) | 5 (20) |
| DM—no. (%)b | 5 (20) | 9 (36) |
| Ischemic heart disease—no. (%)b | 0 | 1 (4) |
| Asthma—no. (%)b | 0 | 1 (4) |
| COPD—no. (%)b | 1 (4) | 0 |
| Hypothyroidism—no. (%)b | 2 (8) | 1 (4) |
| C. Intensive care need | ||
| ICU admission (%)b | 1 (4) | 2 (8) |
BMI Body Mass Index, DM Diabetes Mellitus, COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, ICU Intensive care unit
aValues are given as the mean ± SEM
bValues are given as the number of patients (%)
Fig. 2Change of oxygen saturation in BAs group and placebo group after the intervention (day 14). Data is presented as mean ± SEM and was analyzed using ANCOVA test. P < 0.05 was considered significant
Symptoms of COVID-19 patients in BAs group and placebo group at the baseline and day 14
| Physical examinations | BAs group ( | Placebo group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Day 14 | Baseline | Day 14 | ||
| Body temperature (°C)a | 37.31 ± 0.16 | 36.40 ± 0.04 | 37.33 ± 0.19 | 36.50 ± 0.05 | 0.201 |
| Heart rate ( | 85.33 ± 2.18 | 78.58 ± 0.92 | 81.09 ± 1.85 | 80.57 ± 1.11 | 0.19 |
| Oxygen saturation (%)a | 91.50 ± 0.63 | 96.00 ± 0.38 | 90.83 ± 0.35 | 93.35 ± 0.39 | 0.0001 |
| Cough (%)b | 24 (100) | 2 (8.3) | 22 (95.6) | 4 (17.4) | – |
| Shortness of breath (%)b | 24 (100) | 4 (16.6) | 23 (100) | 8 (30.4) | – |
| Body pain (%)b | 23 (95.8) | 0 (0) | 20 (86.9) | 3 (17.39) | – |
| Headache (%)b | 18 (75) | 1 (4.2) | 16 (69.5) | 1 (4.3) | – |
Data were analyzed using ANCOVA test and P < 0.05 was considered significant
aValues are given as the mean ± SEM w
bValues are given as the number of patients (%)
Recovery of olfactory and gustatory sense in COVID-19 patients in BAs group and placebo group at the baseline and day 14
| Outcome | BAs group ( | Placebo group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Day 14 | Baseline | Day 14 | |
| Olfactory sense | ||||
Normal Moderate Weak | 19 (79.1%) 0 (0%) 5 (20.8%) | 24 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) | 20 (86.9%) 0 (0%) 3 (%) | 20 (86.9%) 3 (13.0%) 0 (0%) |
| Gustatory sense | ||||
Normal Moderate Weak | 21 (87.5%) 0 (0%) 3 (12.5%) | 24 (100%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) | 21 (91.3%) 0 (0%) 2 (8.7%) | 21 (91.3%) 2 (8.7%) 0 (0%) |
Values are given as the number of patients (%)
Length of hospitalization, as the main primary outcome
| BAs group ( | Placebo group ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital stay | 4.20 ± 0.68 | 5.15 ± 0.45 | 0.04 |
Values are given as the mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using t test and P < 0.05 was considered significant
Fig. 3Comparison of the length of hospital stay in BAs and placebo groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and was analyzed using t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant
Level of blood biomarkers of patients in BAs and placebo groups at baseline and day 14th
| Laboratory tests results | BAs group ( | Placebo group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Day 14 | Baseline | Day 14 | ||
| WBC count (× 1000/uL) | 7.62 ± 0.56 | 7.81 ± 0.62 | 7.31 ± 0.56 | 8.90 ± 0.47 | 0.056 |
| Neutrophil (%) | 78.37 ± 2.29 | 62.80 ± 2.17 | 75.86 ± 2.12 | 70.27 ± 2.40 | 0.006 |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 17.09 ± 2.01 | 28.41 ± 2.01 | 19.02 ± 1.73 | 20.74 ± 2.10 | 0.002 |
| NLR | 6.45 ± 0.77 | 2.74 ± 0.37 | 5.43 ± 0.90 | 4.61 ± 0.60 | 0.003 |
| ESR (mm/H) | 61.79 ± 4.88 | 26.75 ± 3.85 | 51.30 ± 4.76 | 30.83 ± 4.18 | 0.164 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 94.89 ± 10.25 | 9.83 ± 3.01 | 75.17 ± 10.30 | 23.67 ± 8.28 | 0.034 |
| LDH (U/L) | 550.5 ± 54.41 | 207.5 ± 10.92 | 595.1 ± 50.89 | 251.5 ± 16.79 | 0.04 |
| ALT (U/L) | 42.17 ± 6.10 | 32.21 ± 4.05 | 35.13 ± 3.84 | 39.35 ± 6.19 | 0.128 |
| PT (s) | 12.63 ± 0.10 | 13.10 ± 0.17 | 13.54 ± 0.51 | 14.51 ± 1.17 | 0.653 |
| PTT (s) | 30.33 ± 0.68 | 33.46 ± 1.01 | 30.00 ± 0.65 | 32.91 ± 1.33 | 0.717 |
| INR | 1.04 ± 0.01 | 1.03 ± 0.01 | 1.12 ± 0.04 | 1.17 ± 0.09 | 0.89 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.13 ± 0.25 | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | 0.86 |
| CPK(U/L) | 94.83 ± 10.33 | 69.00 ± 12.57 | 99.87 ± 11.63 | 49.26 ± 4.75 | 0.15 |
WBC white blood cell, NLR neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, ESR Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP C-reactive protein, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, PT prothrombin time, PTT partial thromboplastin time, INR international normalized ratio, CPK creatine phosphokinase
Data are presented as mean ± SEM and were analyzed using ANCOVA test and P < 0.05 was considered significant
Fig. 4A Neutrophil percent, B Lymphocyte percent, C NLR D the levels of CRP, and E LDH, day 14 post-intervention in both BAs group and placebo group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and were analyzed using ANCOVA test. P < 0.05 was considered significant
Levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10 (pg/mL) in BAs group and placebo group at the baseline and day 14
| Factors (pg/mL) | BAs group ( | Placebo group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Day 14 | Baseline | Day 14 | ||
| IL-1β | 4.081 ± 0.655 | 2.020 ± 0.359 | 0.413 ± 0.334 | 3.809 ± 0.825 | 0.124 |
| IL-6 | 11.21 ± 1.379 | 3.268 ± 0.415 | 4.880 ± 0.683 | 5.638 ± 0.518 | 0.001 |
| TNF-α | 79.79 ± 4.509 | 69.90 ± 3.513 | 79.78 ± 3.996 | 93.05 ± 6.051 | 0.0001 |
| IL-10 | 4.346 ± 1.412 | 14.48 ± 5.221 | 12.61 ± 3.038 | 7.605 ± 1.957 | 0.18 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM and were analyzed using ANCOVA test and P < 0.05 was considered significant
Fig. 5Levels of inflammatory cytokines at day 14 post-intervention in both BAs and placebo groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and were analyzed using ANCOVA test. P < 0.05 was considered significant
Comparing outcomes of RT-PCR test in BAs and placebo groups at the baseline and 14th day
| RT-PCR | BAs group ( | Placebo group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Day 14 | Baseline | Day 14 | ||
Positive Negative | 24 (100%) 0 (0%) | 7 (29.2%) 17 (70.83%) | 23 (100%) 0 (0%) | 12 (52.2%) 11 (47.8%) | 0.108 |
Values are given as the number of patients (%)
P value were calculated using chi-square and P < 0.05 was considered as significant