Literature DB >> 35201380

Diversity and turnover of wild bee and ornamental plant assemblages in commercial plant nurseries.

Jacob M Cecala1, Erin E Wilson Rankin2.   

Abstract

In human-modified landscapes, understanding how habitat characteristics influence the diversity and composition of beneficial organisms is critical to conservation efforts and modeling ecosystem services. Assessing turnover, or the magnitude of change in species composition across sites or through time, is crucial to said efforts, yet is often overlooked. For pollinators such as wild bees, variables influencing temporal turnover, particularly across seasons within a year, remain poorly understood. To investigate how local and landscape characteristics correlate with bee diversity and turnover across seasons, we recorded wild bee and flowering ornamental plant assemblages at 13 plant nurseries in California between spring and autumn over 2 years. Nurseries cultivate a broad diversity of flowering plant species that differ widely across sites and seasons, providing an opportunity to test for correlations between turnover and diversity of plants and bees. As expected, we documented strong seasonal trends in wild bee diversity and composition. We found that local habitat factors, such as increased cultivation of native plants, were positively associated with bee diversity in sweep netting collections, whereas we detected moderate influences of landscape level factors such as proportion of surrounding natural area in passive trap collections. We also detected a moderate positive correlation between the magnitude of turnover in plant species and that of bee species (as number of taxa gained) across consecutive seasons. Our results have implications for the conservation of wild bees in ornamental plant landscapes, and highlight the utility of plant nurseries for investigating hypotheses related to diversity and turnover in plant-pollinator systems.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; California; Horticulture; Native bees; Native plants

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35201380     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05135-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  22 in total

1.  Bee diversity effects on pollination depend on functional complementarity and niche shifts.

Authors:  Jochen Fründ; Carsten F Dormann; Andrea Holzschuh; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference.

Authors:  Miquel De Cáceres; Pierre Legendre
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Does Passive Sampling Accurately Reflect the Bee (Apoidea: Anthophila) Communities Pollinating Apple and Sour Cherry Orchards?

Authors:  Jason Gibbs; Neelendra K Joshi; Julianna K Wilson; Nikki L Rothwell; Karen Powers; Mike Haas; Larry Gut; David J Biddinger; Rufus Isaacs
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.377

4.  Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss.

Authors:  Maria Dornelas; Nicholas J Gotelli; Brian McGill; Hideyasu Shimadzu; Faye Moyes; Caya Sievers; Anne E Magurran
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.

Authors:  Lucas A Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Lawrence D Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel Cariveau; Natacha P Chacoff; Jan H Dudenhöffer; Breno M Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K Javorek; Christina M Kennedy; Kristin M Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M Mayfield; Iris Motzke; Theodore Munyuli; Brian A Nault; Mark Otieno; Jessica Petersen; Gideon Pisanty; Simon G Potts; Romina Rader; Taylor H Ricketts; Maj Rundlöf; Colleen L Seymour; Christof Schüepp; Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi; Hisatomo Taki; Teja Tscharntke; Carlos H Vergara; Blandina F Viana; Thomas C Wanger; Catrin Westphal; Neal Williams; Alexandra M Klein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Decreasing abundance, increasing diversity and changing structure of the wild bee community (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) along an urbanization gradient.

Authors:  Laura Fortel; Mickaël Henry; Laurent Guilbaud; Anne Laure Guirao; Michael Kuhlmann; Hugues Mouret; Orianne Rollin; Bernard E Vaissière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region.

Authors:  Benoît Geslin; Violette Le Féon; Morgane Folschweiller; Floriane Flacher; David Carmignac; Eric Motard; Samuel Perret; Isabelle Dajoz
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 8.  Supporting Bees in Cities: How Bees Are Influenced by Local and Landscape Features.

Authors:  Anthony C Ayers; Sandra M Rehan
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Bumble bees (Bombus spp) along a gradient of increasing urbanization.

Authors:  Karin Ahrné; Jan Bengtsson; Thomas Elmqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Most ornamental plants on sale in garden centres are unattractive to flower-visiting insects.

Authors:  Mihail Garbuzov; Karin Alton; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.