| Literature DB >> 35200628 |
Yuji Sumii1, Kentaro Kamiya1, Takehiko Nakamura1, Kenta Tanaka1, Takumi Kaji1, Junya Mukomura2, Naoyuki Kotoku1,2, Masayoshi Arai1.
Abstract
The current tuberculosis treatment regimen is long and complex, and its failure leads to relapse and emergence of drug resistance. One of the major reasons underlying the extended chemotherapeutic regimen is the ability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to attain a dormant state. Therefore, the identification of new lead compounds with chemical structures different from those of conventional anti-tuberculosis drugs is essential. The compound 3-(phenethylamino)demethyl(oxy)aaptamine (PDOA, 1), isolated from marine sponge of Aaptos sp., is known as an anti-dormant mycobacterial substance, and has been reported to be effective against the drug resistant strains of M. tuberculosis. However, its target protein still remains unclear. This study aims to clarify the structure-activity relationship of 1 using 15 synthetic analogues, in order to prepare a probe molecule for detecting the target protein of 1. We succeeded in creating the compound 15 with a photoaffinity group that retained antimicrobial activity, which proved to be a suitable probe molecule for identifying the target protein of 1.Entities:
Keywords: aaptamine; antibiotics; dormant; probe molecule; structure–activity relationship; tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35200628 PMCID: PMC8879696 DOI: 10.3390/md20020098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Scheme 1Synthesis of PDOA (1) and its analogues.
Scheme 2Synthesis of biotinylated probes 12 and 13.
Scheme 3Synthesis of compounds 8, 9, and 14.
Figure 1Chemical structures of synthetic analogues of PDOA. The length of the methylene group and functional groups of R1 and R2 are shown in Table 1.
Anti-microbial activity of compounds on M. bovis BCG under both aerobic and hypoxic conditions.
| MIC (µM) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounds 1 | R1 | R2 | n 2 | Aerobic | Hypoxic |
| H | CH3 | 2 | 3.13 | 1.56 | |
|
| F | CH3 | 2 | 3.13 | 1.56 |
|
| Br | CH3 | 2 | 3.13 | 0.78 |
|
| CH3 | CH3 | 2 | 3.13 | 1.56 |
|
| OCH3 | CH3 | 2 | 3.13 | 3.13 |
|
| CH2OH | CH3 | 2 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
|
| CH3 | 2 | 3.13 | 3.13 | |
|
| H | H | 2 | 50 | 25 |
|
| H | propargyl | 2 | 12.5 | 6.25 |
|
| H | CH3 | 1 | 12.5 | 6.25 |
|
| H | CH3 | 3 | 6.25 | 1.56 |
|
| O-S1 | CH3 | 2 | >200 | >200 |
|
| O-S2 | CH3 | 2 | >200 | 200 |
|
| H | S1 | 2 | 100 | 100 |
|
| S3 | CH3 | 1 | 6.25 | 1.56 |
|
| S3 | CH3 | 2 | 12.5 | 1.56 |
| Isoniazid | - | - | - | 0.22 | >730 |
1 The structures of the basic skeleton of compounds, namely S1, S2, and S3 are shown in Figure 1. 2 “n” indicates the length of methylene group of PDOA analogues in Figure 1.
Figure 2Evaluation of compound 15 as a probe molecule for detecting the target protein. The compound 15 was incubated in the lysate of M. bovis BCG for 1 h at 4 °C. After irradiation (365 nm) for 10 min, the proteins in lysate were precipitated by cold acetone. The precipitant was separated by SDS-PAGE. The protein-compound 15 complexes were detected by the fluorescence of compound 15 (Ex: 505 nm, Em: 555 nm) (A). The gel was also stained by CBB (B). The display of “+” and “−” indicated the presence (+) or absence (−) of compound 15 or UV irradiation.