| Literature DB >> 35200489 |
Yuanyuan Zhang1,2, Qian Li1,2, Jinglu Hu2,3, Chunqing Wang1,2, Delian Wan1,2, Qi Li1,2, Qingwei Jiang4, Lina Du1,2,3, Yiguang Jin2,3.
Abstract
(1) Background: When the body is exposed to microwave radiation, the brain is more susceptible to damage than other organs. However, few effective drugs are available for the treatment of microwave-induced brain injury (MIBI) because most drugs are difficult to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to reach the brain. (2)Entities:
Keywords: brain targeting; cinnarizine; inclusion complex; intranasal administration; microwave-induced brain injury (MIBI); sulfobutyl-β-cyclodextrin; thermo- and ion-sensitive hydrogels
Year: 2022 PMID: 35200489 PMCID: PMC8872061 DOI: 10.3390/gels8020108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Figure 1(a) Phase dissolution curves of cinnarizine and SBE-β-CD. (b) Inclusion mechanism of cinnarizine and SBE-β-CD.
Figure 2The infrared spectra (a) and DSC curves (b) of cinnarizine, SBE-β-CD, the cinnarizine SBE-β-CD inclusion complexes, and their physical mixture.
Figure 3(a) Viscosity profiles of ISGs with temperature. (b) In vitro drug release profile of cinnarizine ISGs. (c) Survival rate of PC12 cells with cinnarizine ISGs.
Brain targeting parameters of cinnarizine following intranasal and oral administration.
| Administration | Tissues | AUC0–24
| Cmax
| Tmax
| AUCbrain/ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| i.n. | Blood | 3890 | 304.2 | 0.9 | 0.63 |
| Brain | 2436 | 171.6 | 4 | ||
| p.o. | Blood | 4945 | 611.7 | 1.5 | 0.19 |
| Brain | 952.8 | 130.4 | 4 |
Figure 4In vivo profiles of cinnarizine ISGs. (a) Cinnarizine formulations’ concentration in the blood by p.o., i.n., and i.v. administration (n = 5); (b) its concentration in the brain after p.o., i.v., and i.n. administration (n = 3). (c) In vivo fluorescence imaging of mice with RB via oral or nasal route over time. (d) Fluorescence imaging of the major organs at 240 min.
Figure 5Average escape latency (a), number of platforms (b), and the trace map (c) of rats in the Morris water maze. (* p < 0.05, **** p < 0.001 vs. normal; #### p < 0.001 vs. model.)
Figure 6Number of times rats entered the central area (a), total distance (b), and the trace map (c) of rats in the open field. (* p < 0.05 vs. normal; # p < 0.05 vs. model.)
Figure 7(a) H&E staining of the DG of the hippocampus in rat brains (the black arrows represent the pyknosis and deep staining parts of neurons); (b) expression of IL-1β in the rat hippocampus; (c) CaN expression of the CA1 of the hippocampus in the rat brain, and the integrated optical density (IOD) of the CA1 of the hippocampus in the rat brain (d); (e) calpain-1 expression of the CA1 of the hippocampus in the rat brain, and the IOD of the CA1 of the hippocampus in the rat brain (f). (* p < 0.05, **** p < 0.001 vs. normal; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p = 0.001 vs. model.)
Figure 8(a) Morphological changes in PC12 cells before and after differentiation (20×); (b) cell culture medium with cinnarizine (10×); (c) the cytotoxicity of PC12 cells with different concentrations of cinnarizine; (d) the pictures of PC12 cells with fluo-3; (e) the average fluorescence intensity of PC12 cells with fluo-3. (** p < 0.01 vs. normal; # p < 0.05 vs. model.)
Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) conditions.
| Name | Q1 Mass (Da) | Q3 Mass (Da) | Time (Msec) | DP (Volts) | EP (Volts) | CE (Volts) | CXP (Volts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buspirone | 386.4 | 122.2 | 100 | 180 | 11 | 43 | 16 |
| Cinnarizine | 369.3 | 167.2 | 100 | 20 | 11 | 20 | 4 |
Figure 9Scheme of pharmacodynamics study of cinnarizine ISGs.