| Literature DB >> 35199228 |
Miranda L Wilson1,2, Jarl A Thysell1,3, Kristen K Baumann1, Danny V Quaranta1,3, W Sandy Liang1, Michelle A Erickson4,5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anesthetics are required for procedures that deliver drugs/biologics, infectious/inflammatory agents, and toxicants directly to the lungs. However, the possible confounding effects of anesthesia on lung inflammation and injury are underreported. Here, we evaluated the effects of two commonly used anesthetic regimens on lung inflammatory responses to ozone in mice.Entities:
Keywords: Atipamezole; Inflammation; Isoflurane; Ketamine; Ozone; Serum amyloid A; Xylazine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35199228 PMCID: PMC9038869 DOI: 10.1007/s00408-022-00514-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lung ISSN: 0341-2040 Impact factor: 3.777
Fig. 1Schematic of anesthesia/ozone (O3) exposure protocols. A shows the exposure protocol for mice pre-exposed to isoflurane (Iso) or air control, and B shows the exposure protocol for mice pre-exposed to Ketamine/Xylazine (K/X) and atipamezole (A) or saline vehicle. Created with Biorender.com
Fig. 2Effects of isoflurane (Iso) and ketamine/xylazine/atipamezole (K/X/A) on inflammatory (A–C) and vascular damage (D) markers in the lung, blood levels of serum amyloid A (SAA, E), and weight loss (F). In all panels, n = 6–20 per group. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, air vs. O3. ###p < 0.001, ##p < 0.01, #p < 0.05, vs. K/X/A + O3 group. &p < 0.05 vs. No Anesthesia + O3. Group mean comparisons were carried out using Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
Two-way ANOVA analysis results showing percentages of variation by factor (main effects, interactions) and F-statistics
| Figure | Anesthesia | Exposure | Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.97%; | 29.96%; | 12.79%; | |
| 31.77%; | 25.59%; | 11.72%; | |
| 9.766%, | 44.88%; | 11.82%; | |
| 2.776%; | 33.06%; | 3.888%; | |
| 7.296%, | 35.35%; | 7.204%; | |
| 7.784%; | 52.74%; | 1.903%; |
For Fig. 2D, one sample was excluded because of apparent blood contamination. For Fig. 2E, one sample was excluded because not enough serum was recovered to complete the assay. For Fig. 2F, body weights were not measured in one experimental replicate and so 23 samples are missing