| Literature DB >> 35198526 |
Ahila A1, Poongodi M2, Mounir Hamdi2, Sami Bourouis3, Kulhanek Rastislav4, Faizaan Mohmed5.
Abstract
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive, neurodegenerative brain disease and is an incurable ailment. No drug exists for AD, but its progression can be delayed if the disorder is identified at its initial stage. Therefore, an early analysis of AD is of fundamental importance for patient care and efficient treatment. Neuroimaging techniques aim to assist the physician in the diagnosis of brain disorders by using images. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a kind of neuroimaging technique employed to create 3D images of the brain. Due to many PET images, researchers attempted to develop computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) to differentiate normal control from AD. Most of the earlier methods used image processing techniques for preprocessing and attributes extraction and then developed a model or classifier to classify the brain images. As a result, the retrieved features had a significant impact on the recognition rate of previous techniques. A novel and enhanced CAD system based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) is formulated to address this issue, capable of discriminating normal control from Alzheimer's disease patients. The proposed approach is evaluated using the 18FDG-PET images of 855 patients, including 635 normal control and 220 Alzheimer's disease patients from the ADNI database. The result showed that the proposed CAD system yields an accuracy of 96%, a sensitivity of 96%, and a specificity of 94%, leading to splendid performance when related to the methods already in use that are specified in the literature.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; accuracy; convolutional neural network; deep learning; feature extraction; image analysis; image classification and positron emission tomography
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35198526 PMCID: PMC8860231 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.834032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Demographic details of 18FDG-PET image dataset.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 635 | 220 |
| Age | 70 | 75 |
| Gender (M/F) | 35/15 | 30/20 |
| MMSE | 24–30 | 20–26 |
| CDR | 0 | 1.5 or 1 |
Figure 1Outcome of co-registration.
Figure 2Framework of the proposed CAD system.
Figure 3Convolutional neural network.
CNN parameters employed.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Input image | 160 x 160 x 1 | ||
| 2 | Convolution layer 1 (C1) | 3 x 3/1 | 16 | 158 x 158 x 16 |
| 3 | Pooling layer 1 (P1) | 2 x 2/2 | 79 x 79 x 16 | |
| 4 | Convolution layer 2 (C2) | 3 x 3/1 | 32 | 39 x 39 x 32 |
| 5 | Pooling layer 2 (P2) | 2 x 2/2 | 20 x 20 x 32 | |
| 6 | Convolution layer 3 (C3) | 3 x 3/2 | 64 | 10 x 10 x 64 |
| 7 | Flatten | 6,400 | ||
| 8 | Fully connected layer | 512 | 512 | |
| 9 | Soft max | 2 | 2 |
Figure 4Sample of preprocessed NC images.
Figure 5Sample of preprocessed AD images.
Figure 6Sample slices of NC patient.
Figure 7Sample slices of AD patient.
Figure 8CNN training process.
Figure 9Confusion matrix.
Figure 10ROC curve of the proposed system.
Performance comparison of the proposed system with existing systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cabral and Silveria ( | PET | PCA-SVM | 74.18 | 92.75 | 15.91 |
| Liu et al. ( | FDG-PET | SVM | 90 | 82.7 | 80.4 |
| Islam and Zhang ( | MRI | CNN | 95.3 | 84.4 | 71.4 |
| Silveira and Marques ( | MRI | DNN | 86.1 | 84 | 74.8 |
| Poongodi and Bose ( | FDG-PET | CNN-RNN | 95.3 | 91.4 | 91 |
| Proposed | FDG-PET | CNN | 96.8 | 94 | 96 |
Figure 11Performance comparisons in terms of accuracy.