| Literature DB >> 35198084 |
James Yuheng Jiang1, Christine Kang1, Stuart Jackson2,3,4, Nicola Jeffery2,3, Matthew Winter2,3, Ken Le1, Robert Mansberg1,4.
Abstract
Urachal adenocarcinomas are rare cancers of the urinary bladder. Both CT and MRI are useful imaging modalities for the diagnosis and evaluation of urachal adenocarcinoma. Unlike CT or MR, there have been variable FDG PET findings with urachal tumours potentially due to considerable variation in their hypermetabolism. We present the case of a 24 year-old female patient who was diagnosed with urachal mucinous adenocarcinoma with characteristic features on CT and MRI which also exhibit moderately increased FDG avidity. CrownEntities:
Keywords: FDG; MRI; PET; PET/CT; Urachal adenocarcinoma; Urachus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35198084 PMCID: PMC8844653 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.01.069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Case Rep ISSN: 1930-0433
Fig. 1Longitudinal view of the bladder on ultrasound showed a midline mixed echogenic mass with central calcific focus at the dome of the bladder.
Fig. 2Axial (A) and sagittal (B) CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast showing a midline lobulated mixed solid and cystic mass centred in the anterosuperior aspect of the urinary bladder, measuring up to 5.5 cm containing low attenuation material (25 Hounsfield units) and coarse calcification centrally. The mass was abutting the uterus and sigmoid colon superiorly with no gross evidence of invasion.
Fig. 3MRI of the pelvis with intravenous Gadolinium contrast demonstrates a heterogeneous irregular mass in the anterosuperior aspect of the urinary bladder that is T1 isointense (A and D – axial and sagittal fat suppressed T1-weighted images) and T2 hyperintense (B and C – axial and sagittal fat suppressed T2) relative to the urinary bladder wall with central non-enhancement and peripheral enhancement (C and F – contrast enhanced axial and sagittal fat suppressed T1-weighted images). Although there was serosal enhancement and abutment against the anterior surface of the uterus and sigmoid colon, there was no convincing evidence of invasion. There was no enhancement along the urachal remnant.
Fig. 418F FDG PET/CT (A – MIP, B – axial PET and fused PET/CT and C – sagittal PET and fused PET/CT) shows moderately increased FDG uptake at the margin of the mass (SUVmax up to 5.8) corresponding to the enhancing soft tissue components on CT and MR with extensive central photopenia corresponding to the low attenuation region on CT and T2 hyperintense region on MR. There was no evidence of regional nodal or distant FDG avid metastasis.