Literature DB >> 35197784

Phenology and production of Hassaoui grapevines as affected by climate anomalies in Al Ahsa region.

Saleh M Alturki1.   

Abstract

Climate change is a dramatic crisis that has left severe impacts on viticulture. Phenological events over 41 years and annual climatic anomalies' data over these years in Al Ahsa region were procured. Annual temperature and wind speed anomalies had the strongest influence on all phenological events of the varieties White and Red Hassaoui, starting from the beginning of budburst until harvest. Moreover, the average yield of both varieties decreased significantly by 319.4 and 317 kg ha-1 respectively between 1997 and 2019 in comparison with the interval of years 1979-1996. Earlier phenological events were positively correlated with annual temperature anomaly and negatively correlated with annual wind speed anomaly. The latter shortened the dates of occurrence of beginning and full veraison. Yield decreased with higher annual temperature, wind speed and total cloud cover anomalies, and lower annual total precipitation anomaly. Higher annual temperature and wind speed anomalies were correlated with a shorter period between beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison (P3). Shorter periods between beginning and full veraison (P6) and beginning of veraison and harvest (P7) of Red Hassaoui were positively correlated with annual precipitable water anomaly. Results suggest a high level of adaptation of both tested varieties to changing climate conditions in Al Ahsa, though irrigating vines after harvest on a weekly basis would help overcoming the minimal reduction in yield which was caused by the shortage in precipitation.
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Al Ahsa; Ann PWA, annual precipitable water anomaly; Ann TA, annual temperature anomaly; Ann TCCA, annual total cloud cover anomaly; Ann TPA, annual total precipitation anomaly; Ann WSA, annual wind speed anomaly; Climate change; ECMWF ERA5, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts; GCC, Gulf Cooperation Council; KSA, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; P1, beginning of budburst to beginning of flowering; P10, full flowering to harvest; P11, beginning of budburst to harvest; P2, beginning of budburst to beginning of fruit set; P3, beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison; P3, period between beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison; P4, beginning of flowering to beginning of veraison; P5, full flowering to full veraison; P6, beginning to full veraison; P6, period between beginning and full veraison; P7, beginning of veraison to harvest; P7, period between beginning of veraison and harvest; P8, full veraison to harvest; P9, beginning of flowering to harvest; Phenological events; Saudi Arabia; UAE, United Arab Emirates; Viticulture; Yield; stage 1, beginning of budburst; stage 10, full veraison; stage 11, harvest; stage 2, full budburst; stage 3, 2–3 leaves unfolded; stage 4, visible inflorescence; stage 5, beginning of flowering; stage 6, full flowering; stage 7, beginning of fruit set; stage 8, full fruit set; stage 9, beginning of veraison

Year:  2021        PMID: 35197784      PMCID: PMC8847931          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.09.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci        ISSN: 2213-7106            Impact factor:   4.219


Introduction

Climate change arises after more than ten thousand years of relative stability. The extent of its effects on individual regions will vary over time, with the ability of different social and environmental systems to mitigate or adapt to this issue. Increases in global mean temperature of<1 to 3°Celsius, starting from the year 1990, will produce beneficial impacts in some regions and harmful ones in others (IPCC, 2013). According to Almazroui (2020) the summer maximum temperature is likely to increase continuously for most cities of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) at the rate of about 0.2 °C-0.6 °C per decade for the future period (2020–2099). Earlier studies have also mentioned the possibility of large scale warming over different parts of the Arabian Peninsula as a resultant of the lack of efficient mitigation measures especially in the eastern province of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (Lelieveld et al., 2016, Pal and Eltahir, 2016). Projections suggest that the rate of increase in agricultural production will slow over the next few decades, and it may start to decline after about 2050 (Verner et al., 2012). Agricultural development in Arab countries’ will be most likely negatively affected by climate change (Tolba and Saab, 2009). Climate is an important forcing factor on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) physiological development (Keller, 2010), vegetative growth (Van Leeuwen et al., 2004), phenology (Costa et al., 2019), and production (Jones and Davis, 2000, Fraga and Santos, 2017). The duration of each phenological stage differs according to the cultivated variety, and is generally linked to the thermal conditions of each region (Mandelli et al., 2005). Major drought events occurring in South Africa, were closely related to higher temperature and lower rainfall anomalies, which had negative impacts on grapevines yield (Araujo et al., 2014). Moreover, an increase in temperature especially during springtime will cause an advance in the timing of the phenological events; suggesting high phenological shifts in the long-term (Malheiro et al., 2013). On the other hand, climate change may not necessary affect negatively vineyards yields; for instance, some yield increases are expected in Germany and Hungary (Ponti et al., 2018). It is noteworthy that there is a lack of reports concerning the Gulf countries in the Arabian Peninsula, where a plethora of grape varieties is cultivated for direct consumption or industry (Ghantous et al., 2020, Mohasseb et al., 2020). Many of these varieties showed being directly impacted by climate change (Ghantous et al., 2018). In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), lying between 15.2° and 32.6° North and 34.1° and 55.5° East, the climate is mild during winter, dry, and hot during summer, making it suitable for the cultivation of table grapes; the second most produced fruit in KSA (Fahmi et al., 2012). Between 2001 and 2005, the hectarage of planted fruit crops in KSA increased by 13%, where grapes represented 8.5% of this area, yielding around 132 thousand tons (Al-Qurashi, 2010). Locals reported that Al-Sulaybiya, a region in KSA, supplies more than 20 000 tons of different varieties of grapes all over the country (Al-Harbi, 2016). Al Ahsa region, located in the east of the Kingdom, is well known for its traditional, original, and high quality white and red grape varieties, known as “Hassaoui”. However, the climate change issue may affect this agricultural heritage. No previous studies reported the effect of climate change on grapevine cultivation in the Gulf region, and especially in the KSA. Purposely, the variation of phenological events and production traits of White and Red Hassaoui was assessed in relation to years (over 41 years) and climate anomalies occurring at Al-Ahsa during the same time interval.

Materials and methods

Climatic events

Climate data was sourced from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF ERA5) for the years 1979 until 2019. The climatic annual parameters (precipitable water anomaly (Ann PWA) (kg m−2), temperature anomaly (Ann TA) (°C), wind speed anomaly (Ann WSA) (m s−1), total precipitation anomaly (Ann TPA) (m), total cloud cover anomaly (Ann TCCA) (%) were selected for an adequate interpretation of the climate effect on the different phenological stages of the grapevines.

Vineyards description

Al Ahsa province is situated in the Eastern part of KSA at an altitude of 100–150 m above sea level, where summers are long, sweltering, and arid, winters are cool and dry, and it is mostly clear year round. Sunlight lasts in average between 10.3 h to 13.4 h, with a mean fall in temperature of around 10–15 °C between day and night. The vineyards under study were cultivated by White and Red Hassaoui covering a surface of 20,200 and 23100 m2, respectively. In both vineyards, the distance of plantation was of 2.5 m × 1.25 m. White and Red Hassaoui vines were pruned back to spurs about a hand’s width apart, each with two buds. Both vineyards applied a two-line drip irrigation system with three drippers providing 6 L of water per hour per vine. Vines were irrigated once every two weeks. The analysis of physico-chemical characteristics of soil at the selected vineyards is provided in Table 1.
Table 1

Physico-chemical composition of soil at the experimental vineyards.

ParameterWhite Hassaoui vineyardsRed Hassaoui vineyards
Sandy (%)89.289.6
Silt (%)5.85.6
Clay (%)5.04.8
pH7.77.6
EC (dS/m)1.51.8
Cations (mEq/L)
 Na+10.910.8
 K+0.320.28
 Ca2+2.93.2
 Mg2+2.722.76
Anions (mEq/L)
 Cl-8.89.2
 HCO33.43.0
 SO42-4.54.3
Physico-chemical composition of soil at the experimental vineyards.

Data collection

Data on vines (phenological events and yield) was procured by local agricultural engineers, and consisted on yearly records taken on productive vineyards of White or Red Hassaoui in Al Ahsa. At the selected vineyards, vines were randomly selected from the sides and the centre rows for data collection. Assessment of vine’s phenology covered; the beginning of budburst (stage 1), full budburst (stage 2), 2–3 leaves unfolded (stage 3), visible inflorescence (stage 4), beginning of flowering (stage 5), full flowering (stage 6), beginning of fruit set (stage 7), full fruit set (stage 8), beginning of veraison (stage 9), full veraison (stage 10), and harvest (stage 11). The stages 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 were recorded once 10% of the total number of selected vines reached the relative stage, while the stages 6, 8, 10, and 11 were determined when 80% of selected plants reached the relative stage. The stage 2 was recorded when green shoot tips were visible on all sampled vines. All stages were expressed in days after leaf fall, considering the leaf fall stage as the reference day to evaluate the evolution in phenological events. In addition, the periods (in days) between the different phenological stages were determined as follows: beginning of budburst to beginning of flowering (P1), beginning of budburst to beginning of fruit set (P2), beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison (P3), beginning of flowering to beginning of veraison (P4), full flowering to full veraison (P5), beginning to full veraison (P6), beginning of veraison to harvest (P7), full veraison to harvest (P8), beginning of flowering to harvest (P9), full flowering to harvest (P10), and beginning of budburst to harvest (P11). The production of grapevines was evaluated in terms of yield (recorded per vine and then expressed as kg ha−1).

Statistical analysis

Pearson’s correlations were applied to detect the relation between the assessed indicators (occurrence of phenological events, periods between phenological events, and yield) and climate anomalies. Cluster analysis was performed using SPSS program in order to divide years (from 1979 to 2019) based on climate anomalies; each cluster included a series of years having comparable means of the already listed climate factors anomalies. The contribution of each climate anomaly in the cluster analysis was determined using the factor analysis option provided by SPSS program. Besides, Duncan test compared the means of vines’ indicators in between years. Pvalue < 0.05 and < 0.01 were adopted in all statistical tests.

Results

Variation of climatic anomalies

Assessment of climate anomalies from 1979 until 2019 (Fig. 1) shows there were consecutive fluctuations in Ann TCCA over the presented years between positive and negative values. The highest positive value of Ann TCCA, recorded in 2006 (7.98%), indicating that observed total cloud cover was the most dense compared to the normal baseline, while the lowest Ann TCCA, in 1999 (-5.06%), indicating that observed total cloud cover was the least dense compared to the normal baseline in the region.
Fig. 1

Annual total cloud cover anomaly (Ann TCCA) over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA.

Annual total cloud cover anomaly (Ann TCCA) over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA. Similarly, Ann PWA (Fig. 2) fluctuated between positive and negative values. The highest positive value of Ann PWA, recorded in 2019 (2.98 kg m−2), indicated that evaporated water was the most condensate compared to the normal baseline, while the lowest Ann PWA, in 1989 (-1.40 kg m−2), indicated that precipitable water was the least condensate compared to the normal baseline in Al Ahsa region.
Fig. 2

Annual precipitable water anomaly (Ann PWA) over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA.

Annual precipitable water anomaly (Ann PWA) over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA. Ann TA (Fig. 3) followed a continuous positive pattern since 1997 until 2019. Ann TA was also positive during the years 1980, 1981, 1983, 1987, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1995. The highest shift upwards of temperature at Al Ahsa was in 2016 (where Ann TA reached 0.74 °C), while the highest shift downwards was in 1993 (where Ann TA reached −0.21 °C).
Fig. 3

Annual temperature anomaly (Ann TA) over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA.

Annual temperature anomaly (Ann TA) over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA. Except in 2015 and 2019, annual total precipitation (Fig. 4) deviated from the normal annual baseline, whether positively or negatively. During several years, recorded total precipitation was higher than the normal, but during others, it was abnormally low in Al Ahsa. The strongest shift downwards of total precipitation were in 1981, 1994, 2001, and 2010.
Fig. 4

Annual total precipitations (Ann TPA) anomaly over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA.

Annual total precipitations (Ann TPA) anomaly over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA. Abnormal values of annual wind speed (Fig. 5) were positive during 23 years out of 41 years under investigation, and negative during the remaining years. The highest upwards shift of annual wind speed was in 1984 (Ann WSA = 0.34 m s−1), followed by 2008, 1996, and 2013 (Ann WSA = 0.17, 0.16, and 0.15 m s−1 respectively). The highest downwards shift of this climate factor was in 1996 (Ann WSA = -0.25 m s−1), followed by 2017 and 2010 (Ann WSA = -0.21 and −0.15 m s−1, respectively).
Fig. 5

Annual wind speed anomaly (Ann WSA) over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA.

Annual wind speed anomaly (Ann WSA) over 41 years at Al Ahsa, KSA.

Pearson’s correlations

Pearson’ correlations (Table 2) showed that the phenological stages starting from beginning of budburst till full fruit set (stages 1 to 8) and harvest (stage 11) of the White Hassaoui were positively correlated with Ann TA (at a 99% confidence level) and negatively correlated with Ann WSA (at a 95% confidence level). Stages 9 and 10 were positively correlated with Ann TA and Ann WSA (at 99% and 95% confidence levels, respectively). Stages 5 and 11 were strongly positively correlated with Ann PWA (at 95% and 99% confidence, levels respectively). Yield was negatively correlated with Ann TCCA, Ann TA and Ann WSA, and positively with Ann TPA (at a 99% confidence level). The period from beginning of budburst and beginning of veraison (P3) was positively correlated with Ann TA and Ann WSA (at 99% and 95% confidence levels, respectively).
Table 2

Pearson’s correlations between phenological stages, periods between them, and yield in White Hassaoui vineyard (vineyard 1).

Ann TCCAAnn PWAAnn TAAnn TPAAnn WSA
Stage 1−0.3180.2450.941**−0.130−0.830*
Stage 2−0.3490.3580.936**−0.135−0.752*
−0.4720.2340.977**−0.143−0.736*
Stage 4−0.2580.3690.965**−0.038−0.783*
Stage 5−0.4210.768*0.989**−0.155−0.772*
Stage 6−0.2370.5110.902**−0.241−0.802*
Stage 7−0.5210.3940.973**−0.254−0.813*
Stage 8−0.4130.5420.944**−0.281−0.768*
Stage 9−0.3360.5490.924**−0.1560.723*
Stage 10−0.4460.3110.989**−0.1520.739*
Stage 11−0.3500.941**0.910**−0.120−0.725*
Yield−0.917**−0.258−0.978**0.952**−0.964**
P1−0.2280.3140.428−0.1100.012
P2−0.3120.2720.371−0.2300.105
P3−0.2330.3970.922**−0.1550.811*
P4−0.2070.3730.387−0.1380.107
P5−0.4290.1290.473−0.2060.178
P6−0.1170.1340.238−0.0480.222
P7−0.1780.1470.173−0.0270.156
P8−0.1640.2340.290−0.1190.262
P9−0.1250.0980.393−0.2260.388
P10−0.1950.1650.189−0.1240.094
P11−0.2740.1380.274−0.0780.268

Stage 1: beginning of budburst, stage 2: full budburst, stage 3: 2–3 leaves unfolded, stage 4: visible inflorescence, stage 5: beginning of flowering, stage 6: full flowering, stage 7: beginning fruit set, stage 8: full fruit set, stage 9: beginning of veraison, stage 10: full veraison, stage 11: harvest, P1: beginning of budburst to beginning of flowering, P2: beginning of budburst to beginning of fruit set, P3: beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison, P4: beginning of flowering to beginning of veraison, P5: full flowering to full veraison, P6: beginning to full veraison, P7: beginning of veraison to harvest, P8: full veraison to harvest, P9: beginning of flowering to harvest, P10: full flowering to harvest, P11: beginning of budburst to harvest, Ann TCCA: annual total cloud cover anomaly, Ann PWA: annual precipitable water anomaly, Ann TA: annual temperature anomaly, Ann TPA: annual total precipitation anomaly, Ann WSA: annual wind speed anomaly. *: Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level, **: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.

Pearson’s correlations between phenological stages, periods between them, and yield in White Hassaoui vineyard (vineyard 1). Stage 1: beginning of budburst, stage 2: full budburst, stage 3: 2–3 leaves unfolded, stage 4: visible inflorescence, stage 5: beginning of flowering, stage 6: full flowering, stage 7: beginning fruit set, stage 8: full fruit set, stage 9: beginning of veraison, stage 10: full veraison, stage 11: harvest, P1: beginning of budburst to beginning of flowering, P2: beginning of budburst to beginning of fruit set, P3: beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison, P4: beginning of flowering to beginning of veraison, P5: full flowering to full veraison, P6: beginning to full veraison, P7: beginning of veraison to harvest, P8: full veraison to harvest, P9: beginning of flowering to harvest, P10: full flowering to harvest, P11: beginning of budburst to harvest, Ann TCCA: annual total cloud cover anomaly, Ann PWA: annual precipitable water anomaly, Ann TA: annual temperature anomaly, Ann TPA: annual total precipitation anomaly, Ann WSA: annual wind speed anomaly. *: Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level, **: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level. In a similar pattern to the White Hassaoui, the stages 1 to 8 (from beginning of budburst till full fruit set) and the stage 11 (harvest) of the Red Hassaoui (Table 3) were positively correlated with Ann TA (at a 99% confidence level), and negatively with Ann WSA (at a 95% confidence level). The stages of beginning and full veraison (stages 9 and 10) were positively correlated with Ann PWA and Ann WSA at a 95% confidence level, and with Ann TA (at a 99% confidence level). Beginning and full flowering (stages 7 and 8) and the period from beginning of budburst to beginning of fruit set (P2) were negatively correlated with Ann TCCA (at a 95% confidence level). Yield was negatively correlated with Ann TCCA, Ann TA, and Ann WSA, and positively with Ann TPA (at a 99% confidence level). The period from beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison (P3) was positively correlated with Ann TA and Ann WSA (at 99% and 95% levels of confidence, respectively). The periods from beginning to full veraison (P6) and from beginning of veraison to harvest (P7) were positively correlated with Ann PWA (at a 95% confidence level).
Table 3

Pearson’s correlations between phenological events, periods between them and yield in Red Hassaoui vineyard (vineyard 2).

Ann TCCAAnn PWAAnn TAAnn TPAAnn WSA
Stage 1−0.4210.2330.933**−0.107−0.726*
Stage 2−0.2680.3170.942**−0.165−0.779*
Stage 3−0.1780.2150.958**−0.131−0.725*
Stage 4−0.3690.3370.981**−0.087−0.812*
Stage 5−0.2460.6170.978**−0.213−0.741*
Stage 6−0.2270.4780.913**−0.222−0.748*
Stage 7−0.720*0.3160.947**−0.238−0.800*
Stage 8−0.736*0.4220.931**−0.273−0.739*
Stage 9−0.2490.749*0.920**−0.1480.710*
Stage 10−0.3420.711*0.968**−0.1610.802*
Stage 11−0.2280.4230.940**−0.108−0.719*
Yield−0.943**−0.320−0.929**0.914**−0.971**
P1−0.2170.3730.472−0.1020.103
P2−0.712*0.2210.529−0.3140.063
P3−0.1470.6610.945**−0.1960.755*
P4−0.3080.6820.415−0.1430.114
P5−0.3170.5110.512−0.2180.136
P6−0.2840.714*0.361−0.0720.249
P7−0.1050.735*0.579−0.0390.123
P8−0.1310.3240.404−0.1140.240
P9−0.1890.3890.525−0.2540.395
P10−0.2830.5270.437−0.2010.111
P11−0.3190.1880.674−0.0620.315

Stage 1: beginning of budburst, stage 2: full budburst, stage 3: 2–3 leaves unfolded, stage 4: visible inflorescence, stage 5: beginning of flowering, stage 6: full flowering, stage 7: beginning fruit set, stage 8: full fruit set, stage 9: beginning of veraison, stage 10: full veraison, stage 11: harvest, P1: beginning of budburst to beginning of flowering, P2: beginning of budburst to beginning of fruit set, P3: beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison, P4: beginning of flowering to beginning of veraison, P5: full flowering to full veraison, P6: beginning to full veraison, P7: beginning of veraison to harvest, P8: full veraison to harvest, P9: beginning of flowering to harvest, P10: full flowering to harvest, P11: beginning of budburst to harvest, Ann TCCA: annual total cloud cover anomaly, Ann PWA: annual precipitable water anomaly, Ann TA: annual temperature anomaly, Ann TPA: annual total precipitation anomaly, Ann WSA: annual wind speed anomaly. *: Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level, **: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

Pearson’s correlations between phenological events, periods between them and yield in Red Hassaoui vineyard (vineyard 2). Stage 1: beginning of budburst, stage 2: full budburst, stage 3: 2–3 leaves unfolded, stage 4: visible inflorescence, stage 5: beginning of flowering, stage 6: full flowering, stage 7: beginning fruit set, stage 8: full fruit set, stage 9: beginning of veraison, stage 10: full veraison, stage 11: harvest, P1: beginning of budburst to beginning of flowering, P2: beginning of budburst to beginning of fruit set, P3: beginning of budburst to beginning of veraison, P4: beginning of flowering to beginning of veraison, P5: full flowering to full veraison, P6: beginning to full veraison, P7: beginning of veraison to harvest, P8: full veraison to harvest, P9: beginning of flowering to harvest, P10: full flowering to harvest, P11: beginning of budburst to harvest, Ann TCCA: annual total cloud cover anomaly, Ann PWA: annual precipitable water anomaly, Ann TA: annual temperature anomaly, Ann TPA: annual total precipitation anomaly, Ann WSA: annual wind speed anomaly. *: Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level, **: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level

Cluster analysis

The two-step cluster analysis (Table 4) showed two identifiable year clusters based on the climate anomalies which occurred all over 41 years. The first cluster grouped the years between 1979 and 1996 (both included), while the second cluster grouped the remaining years from 1997 till 2019 (both included) showing a clear climate change in Al Ahsa region in the last two decades.
Table 4

Cluster analysis based on the climate anomalies.

Cluster 1Cluster 2
19791997
19801998
19811999
19822000
19832001
19842002
19852003
19862004
19872005
19882006
19892007
19902008
19912009
19922010
19932011
19942012
19952013
19962013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Cluster analysis based on the climate anomalies.

Factor strength and contribution

The factor analysis (Table 5) showed that annual total cloud cover anomaly (Ann TCCA) first, and annual precipitable water anomaly (Ann PWA) secondly were the main and most influencing predictors, followed by annual temperature anomaly (Ann TA).
Table 5

Contribution level of each predictor.

PredictorImportance
Ann TCCA (%)2.13
Ann PWA (kg m−2)1.27
Ann TA (°C)1.01
Ann WSA (m s−1)0.43
Ann TPA (m)0.16

Ann TCCA: annual total cloud cover anomaly, Ann PWA: annual precipitable water anomaly, Ann TA: annual temperature anomaly, Ann WSA: annual wind speed anomaly, Ann TPA: annual total precipitation anomaly.

Contribution level of each predictor. Ann TCCA: annual total cloud cover anomaly, Ann PWA: annual precipitable water anomaly, Ann TA: annual temperature anomaly, Ann WSA: annual wind speed anomaly, Ann TPA: annual total precipitation anomaly.

Vine phenology

Results in Table 6 showed that in cluster 2 years (from 1997 till 2019), the phenological stages: beginning of budburst (stage 1), full budburst (stage 2), 2–3 leaves unfolded (stage 3), and visible inflorescence (stage 4) of White Hassaoui were hastened by around 19 days in comparison with the mean values of cluster 1 years (from 1979 till 1996). Also, the phenological stages: beginning of flowering (stage 5), full flowering (stage 6), beginning of fruit set (stage 7) and full fruit set (stage 8) were hastened by around 18 days from 1997 and 2019 in comparison with the mean values of cluster 1 years (Table 7). Moreover, the phenological stages: beginning veraison (stage 9), full veraison (stage 10) and harvest (stage 11) in cluster 2 years were hastened by around 17, 19, and 19 days, respectively compared to their mean values in the first cluster of years (Table 8). All phenological events were the earliest in the last five years (2015–2019), especially in 2016. The average yield of White Hassaoui varied greatly between the two clusters of years, recording the lowest value in 2001 (11277.6 kg ha−1) and the highest one in 1995 (18867.4 kg ha−1). Average yield was higher by 319.4 kg ha−1 in cluster 1 years (1979 to 1996) compared to cluster 2 (1997 to 2019) (Table 8).
Table 6

Variation of stages 1 to 4 phenological events of White Hassaoui as affected by year.

YearStage 1 (Days)Stage 2 (Days)Stage 3 (Days)Stage 4 (Days)
1979210r213p215 s227r
1980202mn206 m209op219mn
1981203no206 m208no220no
1982217u221u224v234u
1983206q211o213r223q
1984214st218 s221u231st
1985215 t218 s220u232 t
1986211r215r218 t228r
1987205pq208n211q222pq
1988203no208n210pq220no
1989211r213p216 s228r
1990200 l204 l207n217 l
1991202mn205 lm208no219mn
1992215 t219st221u232 t
1993218u220tu223v235u
1994213 s216r218 t230 s
1995204op208n211q221op
1996211r213p216 s228r
Cluster 1208.9B212.3B214.9B225.9B
1997201 lm205 lm207n218 lm
1998191 h194gh196ij208 h
1999205pq209n211q222pq
2000205pq208n210pq222pq
2001196jk200jk203 lm213jk
2002191 h194gh196ij208 h
2003191 h194gh196ij208 h
2004195ij199j202 l212ij
2005186ef188e191e203ef
2006190gh193 g195hi207gh
2007190gh193 g195hi207gh
2008197 k201 k204 m214 k
2009190gh194gh197j207gh
2010187f189e192ef204f
2011194i197i199 k211i
2012191 h195 h197j208 h
2013189 g191f194gh206 g
2014187f191f193 fg204f
2015180c183c185c197c
2016170a172a175a187a
2017177b179b182b194b
2018183d186d188d200d
2019185e189e191e202e
Cluster 2190.0 A193.2 A195.6 A207.0 A

Stage 1: beginning of budburst, stage 2: full budburst, stage 3: 2–3 leaves unfolded, stage 4: visible inflorescence. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Table 7

Variation of stages 5 to 8 phenological events of White Hassaoui as affected by year.

YearStage 5 (Days)Stage 6 (Days)Stage 7 (Days)Stage 8 (Days)
1979236 l241r241r258p
1980227j233mn233mn248 l
1981230 k234no234no250mn
1982243o248u248u263r
1983231 k237q237q254o
1984240n245st245st261q
1985240n246 t246 t261q
1986238 m242r242r258p
1987231 k236pq236pq253o
1988230 k234no234no250mn
1989236 l242r242r257p
1990227j231 l231 l248 l
1991228j233mn233mn249 lm
1992240n246 t246 t261q
1993244o249u249u265 s
1994238 m244 s244 s260q
1995231 k235op235op251n
1996236 l242r242r257p
Cluster 1234.8B240.0B240.0B256.0B
1997228j232 lm232 lm248 l
1998218 g222 h222 h239 h
1999231 k236pq236pq253o
2000231 k236pq236pq253o
2001223i227jk227jk244jk
2002218 g222 h222 h239 h
2003218 g222 h222 h239 h
2004222i226ij226ij243ij
2005213e217ef217ef234ef
2006216f221gh221gh238gh
2007216f221gh221gh238gh
2008222i228 k228 k245 k
2009217 fg221gh221gh238gh
2010214e218f218f235f
2011220 h225i225i242i
2012218 g222 h222 h239 h
2013216f220 g220 g237 g
2014213e218f218f235f
2015207c211c211c228c
2016196a201a201a218a
2017204b208b208b225b
2018209d214d214d231d
2019210d216e216e233e
Cluster 2216.5 A221.0 A221.0 A238.0 A

Stage 5: beginning of flowering, stage 6: full flowering, stage 7: beginning fruit set, stage 8: full fruit set. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Table 8

Variation of stages 9 to 11 phenological events and yield of White Hassaoui as affected by year.

YearStage 9 (Days)Stage 10 (Days)Stage 11 (Days)Yield (kg ha−1)
1979294qr308pq323n12329.5de
1980286mn300mn314 l13522.3f
1981285 lm301mn317 m11410.4abc
1982297 t315 t330p15347.2mn
1983290o304o318 m15921.3o
1984295rs312rs328o11858.5bcd
1985296st313st328o11921.7bcd
1986295rs309pq323n14852.2klm
1987289o303o318 m13736.8 fg
1988286mn301mn314 l14127.5ghij
1989292p309pq324n14624.4jkl
1990284 l298 l314 l11656.0abc
1991286mn301mn315 l13934.4fghi
1992295rs313st328o17150.8q
1993300u316u330p14987.2 lm
1994296st311rs324n11355.8ab
1995287n302n317 m18867.4r
1996293pq309pq324n16474.6p
Cluster 1291.0B307.0B321.6B14115.4B
1997284 l299 l314 l15987.3op
1998275 h289 h304 h14366.5hijk
1999289o303o317 m11687.9abc
2000289o303o317 m12531.2e
2001280jk294jk309jk11277.6a
2002275 h289 h304 h11965.2 cd
2003275 h289 h304 h16038.9op
2004279ij293ij308ij15064.7 lm
2005270ef284ef299ef13983.4fghi
2006274gh288gh303gh17026.5q
2007274gh288gh303gh13842.7fgh
2008281 k295 k310 k11568.7abc
2009274gh288gh303gh13844.2fgh
2010271f285f300f11357.3ab
2011278i292i307i14425.0ijk
2012275 h289 h304 h13956.5fghi
2013273 g287 g302 g15622.4no
2014271f285f300f11879bcd
2015264c278c293c14399.5hijk
2016254a268a283a13684.1 fg
2017261b275b290b15889.4o
2018267d281d296d12537.7e
2019269e283e298e14405.9hijk
Cluster 2274.0 A288.0 A303.0 A13796.0 A

Stage 9: beginning of veraison, stage 10: full veraison, stage 11: harvest. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Variation of stages 1 to 4 phenological events of White Hassaoui as affected by year. Stage 1: beginning of budburst, stage 2: full budburst, stage 3: 2–3 leaves unfolded, stage 4: visible inflorescence. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Variation of stages 5 to 8 phenological events of White Hassaoui as affected by year. Stage 5: beginning of flowering, stage 6: full flowering, stage 7: beginning fruit set, stage 8: full fruit set. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Variation of stages 9 to 11 phenological events and yield of White Hassaoui as affected by year. Stage 9: beginning of veraison, stage 10: full veraison, stage 11: harvest. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Concerning the Red Hassaoui, results in Table 9, Table 10 showed that during the cluster 2 years (from 1997 till 2019), the phenological stages 1 (beginning of budburst), 2 (full budburst), 3 (2–3 leaves unfolded), 4 (visible inflorescence), 5 (beginning of flowering), 6 (full flowering), 7 (beginning of fruit set), and 8 (full fruit set) were reduced by around 22, 22, 21, 21, 21, 22, 22, and 22 days respectively compared to the mean values of same indicators recorded in the cluster 1 years (from 1979 till 1996). Also, the beginning of veraison (stage 9), full veraison (stage 10), and harvest (stage 11) were earlier by around 22 days in years of cluster 2 compared to cluster 1 (Table 11). Phenological events of Red Hassaoui also were the earliest in the years 2015 till 2019), especially in 2016. Average yield of this variety recorded the lowest values in 2001 (11126.17 kg ha−1) and 2010 (11154.28 kg ha−1), and the highest value in 1995 (18426.84 kg ha−1). In average, yield decreased by 317 kg ha−1 between 1997 and 2019, compared with its average value noted between 1979 and 1996 (Table 11).
Table 9

Variation of stages 1 to 4 phenological events of Red Hassaoui as affected by year.

YearStage 1 (Days)Stage 2 (Days)Stage 3 (Days)Stage 4 (Days)
1979215 s218 t220rs232r
1980206p210q213op226o
1981204o209pq213op224n
1982218 t222wx224u235 s
1983207p210q214p225no
1984215 s220uv222 t234 s
1985216 s221vw224u235 s
1986212qr215rs219r231qr
1987206p210q214p226o
1988203no207o210n222 m
1989211q214r216q228p
1990200 l205n208 m221 lm
1991202mn205n209mn221 lm
1992215 s219tu221st232r
1993218 t223x226v237 t
1994213r216 s220rs232r
1995204o208op210n221 lm
1996211q216 s219r230q
Cluster 1210.0B214.0B216.8B228.4B
1997201 lm205n209mn220 l
1998190i193ij197ij209ij
1999204o209pq212o224n
2000204o207o209mn221 lm
2001195 k199 m201 l212 k
2002190i195 k198jk210j
2003190i194jk197ij209ij
2004194 k197 l201 l212 k
2005184ef189f192f203e
2006188gh192hi196hi207gh
2007188gh191gh195gh206 fg
2008195 k198 lm202 l213 k
2009188gh192hi196hi207gh
2010185f190 fg194 g205f
2011192j195 k199 k210j
2012189hi193ij197ij208hi
2013187 g192hi196hi208hi
2014184ef187e191ef203e
2015177c181c185c196c
2016167a172a176a188a
2017174b178b182b193b
2018180d184d188d200d
2019183e186e190e202e
Cluster 2188.2 A192.1 A195.8 A207.2 A

Stage 1: beginning of budburst, stage 2: full budburst, stage 3: 2–3 leaves unfolded, stage 4: visible inflorescence. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Table 10

Variation of stages 5 to 8 phenological events of Red Hassaoui as affected by year.

YearStage 5 (Days)Stage 6 (Days)Stage 7 (Days)Stage 8 (Days)
1979241q246rs246rs263 s
1980236p242p242p258q
1981232mn238no238no253o
1982244r248 t248 t265tu
1983233no238no238no255p
1984244r248 t248 t263 s
1985243r247st247st264st
1986240q245qr245qr261r
1987236p242p242p258q
1988230kl234 lm234 lm251mn
1989237p242p242p259q
1990231 lm237n237n253o
1991229jk233kl233kl250 lm
1992241q246rs246rs263 s
1993247 s251u251u266u
1994240q244q244q261r
1995230kl235 m235 m252no
1996240q244q244q259q
Cluster 1237.0B242.0B242.0B258.6B
1997228j232 k232 k249 l
1998218 h223i223i238i
1999234o239o239o255p
2000230kl235 m235 m252no
2001221i226j226j243 k
2002218 h222hi222hi238i
2003217gh221gh221gh238i
2004220i225j225j242 k
2005211e215e215e232e
2006216 fg220 fg220 fg236gh
2007216 fg221gh221gh236gh
2008221i226j226j243 k
2009216 fg220 fg220 fg236gh
2010215f219f219f234f
2011218 h223i223i240j
2012217gh221gh221gh237hi
2013216 fg220 fg220 fg235 fg
2014212e216e216e232e
2015206c210c210c225c
2016196a200a200a215a
2017202b207b207b222b
2018208d212d212d228d
2019211e215e215e231e
Cluster 2216.0 A220.3 A220.3 A236.4 A

Stage 5: beginning of flowering, stage 6: full flowering, stage 7: beginning fruit set, stage 8: full fruit set. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Table 11

Variation of stages 9 to 11 phenological events and yield of Red Hassaoui as affected by year.

YearStage 9 (Days)Stage 10 (Days)Stage 11 (Days)Yield (kg ha−1)
1979299 s313xy328 s12210.7e
1980290p303tu319o13451.5f
1981288o300qr314 l11255.1ab
1982302 t316z331u15153.4n
1983291p304u320o15877.3op
1984299 s312wx326r11754.7 cd
1985300 s314y329st11844.4d
1986296qr308v322p14642.6 lm
1987290p303tu319o13641.6 fg
1988287no301rs316mn14084.8hij
1989295q308v324q14535.9kl
1990284 l296p312 k11542.4bcd
1991286mn301rs315 lm13842.3ghi
1992299 s313xy328 s17034.7r
1993302 t314y330tu14843.5lmn
1994297r311w326r11268.4ab
1995288o301rs317n18426.8 s
1996295q308v324q16389.4q
Cluster 1294.0B307.0B322.0B13988.9B
1997285 lm299q314 l15874.2op
1998274i287jk303 h14276.1jk
1999288o302st317n11542.4bcd
2000288o301rs317n12433.2e
2001279 k291n306i11126.2a
2002274i288kl303 h11814.3d
2003274i287jk303 h15978.6p
2004278 k290mn305i14943.3mn
2005268ef281e297de13874.4ghi
2006272gh286ij301 fg16842.3r
2007272gh284gh300f13769.8fgh
2008279 k293o308j11423.7abc
2009272gh285hi301 fg13752.2fgh
2010269f281e296d11154.3a
2011276j289 lm305i14186.4ijk
2012273hi287jk302gh13844.6ghi
2013271 g283 fg298e15567.4o
2014268ef282ef297de11754.2 cd
2015261c274c290c14266.9jk
2016251a263a278a13569.3 fg
2017258b271b287b15736.6op
2018264d276d291c12468.7e
2019267e281e296d14254.9jk
Cluster 2272.2 A285.3 A300.6 A13671.9 A

Stage 9: beginning of veraison, stage 10: full veraison, stage 11: harvest. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Variation of stages 1 to 4 phenological events of Red Hassaoui as affected by year. Stage 1: beginning of budburst, stage 2: full budburst, stage 3: 2–3 leaves unfolded, stage 4: visible inflorescence. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Variation of stages 5 to 8 phenological events of Red Hassaoui as affected by year. Stage 5: beginning of flowering, stage 6: full flowering, stage 7: beginning fruit set, stage 8: full fruit set. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. Variation of stages 9 to 11 phenological events and yield of Red Hassaoui as affected by year. Stage 9: beginning of veraison, stage 10: full veraison, stage 11: harvest. Means within the same row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Discussion

Weather and climate factors are the keys that govern viticulture (Keller, 2010). Effectively, air temperature may be the biggest factor that influences vines’ vegetative cycle. Precipitation and radiation are also important, though to a lesser extent (Malheiro et al., 2013). In general, higher temperatures during the latter part of winter will accelerate budburst date, and stimulate the vegetative growth during the growing season (Pearce and Coombe, 2004, Keller and Tarara, 2010); a cumulative effect of temperatures above a threshold of 10 °C being the classical thermal requirement for budburst occurrence (Winkler et al., 1974). In the current study, an increasing annual temperature anomaly occurring in Al Ahsa region was correlated with an earliness in budburst and the majority of phenological events. It was mainly observed in 2016 where the highest upward shift in temperature occurred, reflecting abnormally high air temperature in Al Ahsa. Most studies that addressed the links between climate change and vine phenology have reported earlier occurrence of phenological events, shorter phenological intervals, and warmer grape maturation periods, correlating these changes to the rise in temperature (Bock et al., 2011, Tomasi et al., 2011, Urhausen et al., 2011, Malheiro et al., 2013). Keller, 2010, Webb et al., 2012, and Jones (2013) have more specifically reported that higher temperatures will reduce the days to beginning of flowering, veraison, and harvest, confirming our results. Annual temperature anomaly has effectively affected the interval between budburst and veraison of both varieties. In fact, annual temperature anomaly resulted in a hastened harvest of Hassaoui grapes by 19–22 days since 1997 in comparison with earlier years. Roselli et al. (2020) mentioned that early harvest of table grapes in Italy was of high economic returns. Jones and Davis (2000) reported that the shortening of the intervals between flowering to veraison and veraison to harvest is generally linked to better climatic conditions for growth and development. Moreover, the study conducted by Koch and Oehl (2018) in south-west Germany revealed an average 10–24-day shifts in the onset of most important grape phenological events from 1975 until 2015 as a result of the increasing heat stress. Due to the climate change occurring worldwide and affecting naturally the Gulf region in general and KSA in specific, the annual total precipitation were abnormally low in the period after 1997, with some few exceptions, assumedly causing reduction in yield of White and Red Hassaoui. Water stress during budburst and inflorescence development leads to poor flower-clustering development and berry set (Hardie and Considine, 1976), because high soil moisture during this stage is a must for the grapevine growth (Hardie and Martin, 2000). Further, low rainfall impact yield by reducing berry weight and size (Attia, 2007). Changes in grapevine water status at critical phenological stages have a direct effect on grape composition and quality attributes by affecting vegetative growth, yield, and fruit metabolism (Ezzhaouani et al., 2007). Studied vines in the currently presented vineyards were only irrigated from bloom to fruit set. However, irrigating vines after harvest once weekly until June would overcome the water lack caused by reduced precipitations. Earlier, Ghantous et al. (2020) adopted this method of irrigation on Malbec grapevines after harvest until June and acknowledged higher yields. This suggests that farmers have wrongly estimated the heaviness of drought anomaly and the irrigation’s timing wasn’t helpful. contradict this statement. The increase in annual total cloud cover anomaly was negatively correlated with yields of White and Red Hassaoui grapevines, which suggests that lower solar radiation may have negatively affected fruit set. Earlier, Ebadi (1996) reported that cloudy weather during flowering leads to poor fruit set as affected by reduced photosynthesis and thereby, lower light incidence. Jones and Davies (2000) noted that during flowering, veraison, and harvest warm temperatures are required for balanced crop yield. Abnormal temperature increase for consecutive 23 years (between 1997 till 2019) (ranging between a minimum of + 0.12 °C in 1997 and a maximum of + 0.74 °C in 2016) caused a minimal yield reduction by 2.6% and 2.2% for White and Red Hassaoui, respectively compared to earliest years (before 1979). Fidelibus (2018) detected that spring heat waves can reduce fruit set, and thus decrease yield. On the contrary, Greer and Weedon (2013) have earlier found that high temperatures didn’t affect the fruit set of Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon. In addition, higher total cloud cover anomaly was negatively correlated with the date of occurrence of fruiting events (stages 7 and 8). This may suggest the direct effect of lower solar radiation on these phenological stage. Candolfi-Vasconcelos and Koblet (1990) reported that environmental stress and canopy shade may diminish fruit set of grapevines. Moreover, during the early stages of vegetative growth, strong winds play a major role in determining the production of grapevines. It can break off the new shoots, delaying and even reducing the amount of flowering (Jones, 2015). This explains why abnormally high annual wind speed was negatively correlated with budburst, flowering, and fruit set.

Conclusions

The shift in climate conditions between 1997 and 2019 caused early harvest of White and Red Hassaoui, with a minimal reduction in yield of both varieties. Until current date, these grape varieties could adapt to extremes in climate factors occurring after 1997, however, their performance under continuous climate change conditions should be further studied.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author’s approval

Authors confirm that there is no conflict of interests from the presented study.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  2 in total

1.  Warm spring temperatures induce persistent season-long changes in shoot development in grapevines.

Authors:  Markus Keller; Julie M Tarara
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The impact of high temperatures on Vitis vinifera cv. Semillon grapevine performance and berry ripening.

Authors:  Dennis H Greer; Mark M Weedon
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.753

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.