| Literature DB >> 35197753 |
Sridevi Chigurupati1, Atheer Al-Murikhy1, Suliman A Almahmoud1, Yosif Almoshari2, Amira Saber Ahmed3, Shantini Vijayabalan4, Shatha Ghazi Felemban5, Vasanth Raj Palanimuthu6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Oxidative stress is crucial in diabetic pathophysiology, hence the prerequisite of ingesting naturally derived antioxidants as a remedial target. This study investigates the naturally occurring antioxidant and antidiabetic potential of Moringa oleifera ethanolic leaves extract.Entities:
Keywords: Antidiabetic; Antioxidant; Molecular docking; Moringa oleifera; Physicochemical; Phytochemical
Year: 2021 PMID: 35197753 PMCID: PMC8848129 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.10.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Summary of phenolic compound reported found within Moringa oleifera L. Extracts (Nizioł-Łukaszewska et al., 2020).
| Molecular formula | Molar mass (Da) | Identification |
|---|---|---|
| C7H12O6 | 192.2 | Quinic acid |
| C9H8O4 | 180.2 | Caffeic acid |
| C16H18O9 | 354.3 | Chlorogenic acid |
| C7H6O5 | 170.1 | Gallic acid |
| C16H18O8 | 339.0 | Coumaroylquinic acid |
| C21H20O11 | 448.3 | Astragalin |
| C27H30O15 | 594.5 | Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside |
| C21H20O10 | 432.1 | Vitexin |
| C27H30O16 | 610.5 | Rutin |
| C23H22O13 | 506.4 | Quercetin-acetyl-glucoside |
| C24H22O15 | 550.4 | Quercetin-malonyl-glucoside |
| C21H20O12 | 464.1 | Isoquercetin |
| C23H22O12 | 490.4 | Kaempferol acetyl glycoside |
| C15H10O7 | 302.2 | Quercetin |
Phytochemical analysis of MOLE.
| Phytochemical Constituents | M. oleifera |
|---|---|
| Saponin | + |
| Flavonoid | + |
| Gum | + |
| Tannin (Iron III) | + |
| Glycoside | + |
| Protein | – |
| Phenol | + |
| Carbohydrate | + |
| Starch | + |
Fig. 1. (a). Standard curve of Rutin to estimate total flavonoid content; (b). Standard curve of Gallic acid to estimate total phenolic content.
Fig. 2DPPH radical scavenging effects of MOLE and standard, Ascorbic acid.
Alpha-Amylase (%) inhibition of MOLE.
| Concentration | % inhibition of alpha-amylase | |
|---|---|---|
| Acarbose | MOLE | |
| 10 | 31.67 | 25.00 |
| 25 | 41.67 | 41.67 |
| 50 | 75.00 | 62.50 |
| 100 | 83.33 | 73.33 |
| 250 | 88.33 | 85.00 |
| 500 | 90.83 | 88.33 |
| 1000 | 93.33 | 91.67 |
| IC50 ± SEM | 19.45 ± 0.26a | 27.54 ± 0.07a |
Note a SEM using Graph Pad prism 5 (n = 3).
The docking scores and the interacting residues of the phenolic compounds found within Moringa oleifera L. extracts against the human pancreatic α-amylase (HPA).
| Comp. | Docking Scores | Interacting Residues |
|---|---|---|
| Acarbose | − 8.10 | K200, E233, D300, H305 |
| Quinic acid | − 6.60 | E233, D300 |
| Caffeic acid | − 6.70 | W59, D197, E233, D300 |
| Chlorogenic acid | − 8.00 | W59, D197, E233, D300, H305 |
| Gallic acid | − 6.00 | D197, E233, D300 |
| Coumaroylquinic acid | − 8.20 | W59, D300, H305 |
| Astragalin | − 8.50 | E233, D300, H305 |
| Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside | − 9.10 | W56, Q63, D197, E233, H305, D356 |
| Vitexin | − 8.50 | W56, H305, D356 |
| Rutin | − 9.40 | E233, H305, D356 |
| Quercetin-acetyl-glucoside | − 9.20 | W56, D300, H305, D356 |
| Quercetin-malonyl-glucoside | − 9.10 | D197, E233, H305 |
| Isoquercetin | − 8.80 | H305, D356 |
| Kaempferol acetyl glycoside | − 8.10 | D197, D300 |
| Quercetin | − 8.10 | W56, H305, D356 |
Fig. 3Ligands interactions between (a) Rutin against HPA; (b) Kaempferol-3-rutinoside against HPA: The H-bond interactions are shown as green dotted lines, and the π–π stacking interaction are shown as lavender dotted lines.