| Literature DB >> 35197739 |
Bisma Jan1, M Anwar Bhat1, Tauseef A Bhat1, Munazah Yaqoob1, Aijaz Nazir1, M Ashraf Bhat1, Amir H Mir1, Fehim J Wani1, Jitendra Kumar Singh2, Rajesh Kumar3, Kristina Gasparovic4, Xiaolan He5, Omaima Nasif6, Ali Tan Kee Zuan7.
Abstract
The field experiment was conducted during Kharif season of 2020 at Agronomy farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Wadura, SKUAST-K to study the influence of age of seedling and sources of nutrients on phenology, yield and agrometeorological indices for sweet corn. The experiment included two factors viz. age of seedlings (12, 22 and 32 days old seedling) and sources of nutrients (control, RDF, 50 percent RDF + FYM @ 12 t ha-1, 50 percent RDF + vermi-compost @ 4 t ha-1 and 50 percent RDF + poultry manure @ 2 t ha-1) tested in RCBD with three replications. Transplanting 12 days old seedlings required maximum number of days to attain different phenological stages, thereby accumulated maximum heat units followed by 22 days old seedlings. While as transplanting 22 days old seedling recorded significantly highest HUE, HTUE, PTUE and HyTUE and consequently resulted in the highest green cob and biological yield compared to other ages of seedlings. Among various sources of nutrients, application of 50 per cent RDF + poultry manure @ 2 t ha-1 took maximum number of days to attain various phenophases thereby accumulated maximum heat units and registered highest HUE, HTUE, PTUE and HyTUE followed by application of 100 per cent RDF.Entities:
Keywords: Agrometeorological indices; Growing degree days; Phenology; Sweet corn; Yield
Year: 2021 PMID: 35197739 PMCID: PMC8848009 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.10.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Effect of age of seedling on days taken to attain various growth stages of sweet corn under different sources of nutrients.
| Treatment | Days taken | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of seedling (days) | Knee high | Tasseling | Silking | Maturity |
| A1: 12 | 37.29 | 65.93 | 71.70 | 102.43 |
| A2: 22 | 34.66 | 64.33 | 69.70 | 100.35 |
| A3: 32 | 32.38 | 62.20 | 67.10 | 95.69 |
| SE(m)± | 0.46 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | 1.35 | 0.90 | 0.96 | 1.94 |
| Sources of nutrients | ||||
| F0: Control | 31.90 | 61.39 | 67.00 | 95.27 |
| F1: 100% RDF | 36.10 | 65.39 | 70.69 | 101.18 |
| F2:50% RDF + FYM @ 12 t ha−1 | 33.80 | 63.25 | 68.49 | 98.15 |
| F3: 50% RDF + VC @ 4 t ha−1 | 34.25 | 63.69 | 69.10 | 98.62 |
| F4: 50% RDF + PM @ 2 t ha−1 | 37.84 | 67.06 | 72.22 | 104.21 |
| SE(m)± | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.86 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | 1.74 | 1.16 | 1.23 | 2.50 |
Accumulated GDD and HTU at different growth stages of sweet corn.
| Treatment | GDD | HTU | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of seedling (days) | Knee high | Tasseling | Silking | Maturity | Knee high | Tasseling | Silking | Maturity |
| A1: 12 | 421.82 | 823.11 | 922.45 | 1288.49 | 4061.97 | 7355.63 | 8288.21 | 10705.09 |
| A2: 22 | 388.45 | 797.54 | 889.53 | 1266.96 | 3646.68 | 7020.05 | 7854.48 | 10167.78 |
| A3: 32 | 357.28 | 764.17 | 847.43 | 1218.12 | 3456.52 | 6859.14 | 7592.78 | 10070.12 |
| SE(m)± | 2.94 | 4.80 | 5.40 | 6.97 | 25.92 | 33.10 | 34.92 | 44.42 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | 8.51 | 13.92 | 15.66 | 20.19 | 75.11 | 95.93 | 101.20 | 128.71 |
| Sources of nutrients | ||||||||
| F0: Control | 350.75 | 752.18 | 850.46 | 1213.68 | 3271.96 | 6558.27 | 7442.55 | 9854.80 |
| F1: 100% RDF | 405.56 | 815.89 | 907.09 | 1276.92 | 3913.22 | 7292.87 | 8157.68 | 10586.82 |
| F2:50% RDF + FYM @ 12 t ha−1 | 376.04 | 778.81 | 864.78 | 1244.84 | 3635.58 | 6954.84 | 7717.04 | 10308.61 |
| F3: 50% RDF + VC @ 4 t ha−1 | 383.57 | 785.22 | 873.75 | 1247.72 | 3716.26 | 7033.70 | 7855.66 | 9976.27 |
| F4: 50% RDF + PM @ 2 t ha−1 | 429.99 | 842.59 | 936.28 | 1306.12 | 4071.61 | 7551.71 | 8386.20 | 10845.15 |
| SE(m)± | 3.79 | 6.20 | 6.98 | 8.99 | 33.46 | 42.74 | 45.09 | 57.34 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | 10.99 | 17.97 | 20.22 | 26.06 | 96.96 | 123.84 | 130.64 | 166.16 |
Accumulated PTU and HyTU at different growth stages of sweet corn.
| Treatment | PTU | HyTU | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of seedling (days) | Knee high | Tasseling | Silking | Maturity | Knee high | Tasseling | Silking | Maturity |
| A1: 12 | 5775.30 | 11157.26 | 12456.30 | 16997.88 | 26805.30 | 54883.55 | 61803.36 | 88678.96 |
| A2: 22 | 5336.37 | 10820.66 | 12026.95 | 16744.14 | 24676.91 | 53096.13 | 59515.49 | 87257.78 |
| A3: 32 | 4910.96 | 10380.02 | 11477.00 | 16158.26 | 22683.49 | 50764.04 | 56567.45 | 83779.75 |
| SE(m)± | 39.53 | 63.33 | 70.65 | 83.09 | 192.47 | 335.15 | 377.06 | 481.74 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | 114.55 | 183.52 | 204.73 | 240.76 | 557.73 | 971.17 | 1092.61 | 1395.92 |
| Sources of nutrients | ||||||||
| F0: Control | 4822.34 | 10222.80 | 11456.54 | 16105.62 | 22270.42 | 49915.84 | 56542.11 | 83491.82 |
| F1: 100% RDF | 5569.52 | 11061.32 | 12256.47 | 16862.34 | 25772.58 | 54387.18 | 60734.41 | 87933.54 |
| F2:50% RDF + FYM @ 12 t ha−1 | 5166.99 | 10574.31 | 11744.15 | 16479.98 | 23877.58 | 51777.93 | 57981.89 | 85718.39 |
| F3: 50% RDF + VC @ 4 t ha −1 | 5269.29 | 10658.72 | 11840.98 | 16513.17 | 24368.37 | 52252.59 | 58534.19 | 85902.06 |
| F4: 50% RDF + PM @ 2 t ha−1 | 5876.26 | 11412.74 | 12635.62 | 17206.03 | 27320.55 | 56239.33 | 62684.57 | 89815.01 |
| SE(m)± | 51.03 | 81.76 | 91.21 | 107.27 | 248.48 | 432.68 | 486.78 | 621.92 |
Effect of age of seedling on PTI during various growth stages of sweet corn under different sources of nutrients.
| Treatment | PTI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of seedling (days) | Knee high | Tasseling | Silking | Maturity |
| A1: 12 | 11.31 | 12.48 | 12.86 | 12.58 |
| A2: 22 | 11.23 | 12.39 | 12.76 | 12.63 |
| A3: 32 | 11.04 | 12.28 | 12.63 | 12.74 |
| SE(m)± | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | N.S. | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Sources of nutrients | ||||
| F0: Control | 11.00 | 12.25 | 12.69 | 12.74 |
| F1: 100% RDF | 11.24 | 12.47 | 12.83 | 12.62 |
| F2:50% RDF + FYM @ 12 t ha−1 | 11.16 | 12.31 | 12.63 | 12.69 |
| F3: 50% RDF + VC @ 4 t ha−1 | 11.21 | 12.33 | 12.64 | 12.66 |
| F4: 50% RDF + PM @ 2 t ha−1 | 11.36 | 12.56 | 12.96 | 12.53 |
| SE(m)± | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | N.S. | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
Yield and thermal use efficiencies of sweet corn as influenced by age of seedling and sources of nutrients.
| Treatment | Yield | Thermal use efficiencies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of seedling (days) | Green cob yield (q ha−1) | Biological yield (q ha−1) | HUE | HTUE | PTUE | HyTUE |
| A1: 12 | 133.07 | 310.91 | 24.05 | 2.89 | 1.82 | 0.35 |
| A2: 22 | 138.35 | 331.98 | 26.15 | 3.25 | 1.98 | 0.38 |
| A3: 32 | 120.50 | 290.50 | 23.74 | 2.87 | 1.79 | 0.35 |
| SE(m)± | 1.75 | 5.92 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | 5.09 | 17.14 | 1.42 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.02 |
| Sources of nutrients | ||||||
| F0: Control | 79.84 | 221.28 | 18.27 | 2.25 | 1.38 | 0.27 |
| F1: 100% RDF | 149.35 | 346.35 | 27.12 | 3.27 | 2.05 | 0.39 |
| F2:50% RDF + FYM @ 12 t ha−1 | 127.69 | 292.24 | 23.49 | 2.84 | 1.77 | 0.34 |
| F3: 50% RDF + VC @ 4 t ha −1 | 132.57 | 304.35 | 24.39 | 3.06 | 1.84 | 0.35 |
| F4: 50% RDF + PM @ 2 t ha−1 | 163.76 | 391.43 | 29.95 | 3.61 | 2.27 | 0.44 |
| SE(m)± | 2.27 | 7.64 | 0.63 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| CD (p ≤ 0.05) | 6.57 | 22.13 | 1.84 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
Correlation coefficients of agrometeorological indices at maturity against the green cob and biological yield of sweet corn.
| Correlation coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Green cob yield | Biological yield |
| GDD | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| HTU | 0.29 | 0.28 |
| PTU | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| HyTU | 0.68 | 0.64 |
| HUE | 0.92 | 0.99 |
| HTUE | 0.91 | 0.97 |
| PTUE | 0.93 | 0.99 |
| HyTUE | 0.92 | 0.99 |
Fig. 1Linear regression equations fitted to explain the effect of agrometeorological indices on green cob and biological yield of sweet corn.
Fig. 2Linear regression equations fitted to explain the effect of agrometeorological indices on green cob and biological yield of sweet corn.
Fig. 3Linear regression equations fitted to explain the effect of thermal use efficiencies on green cob and biological yield of sweet corn.