| Literature DB >> 35197297 |
Sarah I Palko1, Nicholas J Saba1, Elias Mullane1, Benjamin D Nicholas2, Yosuke Nagasaka2,3, Jayakrishna Ambati2,3, Bradley D Gelfand2,3,4, Akihito Ishigami5, Paola Bargagna-Mohan1, Royce Mohan6.
Abstract
Muller glia (MG) play a central role in reactive gliosis, a stress response associated with rare and common retinal degenerative diseases, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The posttranslational modification citrullination targeting glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in MG was initially discovered in a panocular chemical injury model. Here, we report in the paradigms of retinal laser injury, a genetic model of spontaneous retinal degeneration (JR5558 mice) and human wet-AMD tissues that MG citrullination is broadly conserved. After laser injury, GFAP polymers that accumulate in reactive MG are citrullinated in MG endfeet and glial cell processes. The enzyme responsible for citrullination, peptidyl arginine deiminase-4 (PAD4), localizes to endfeet and associates with GFAP polymers. Glial cell-specific PAD4 deficiency attenuates retinal hypercitrullination in injured retinas, indicating PAD4 requirement for MG citrullination. In retinas of 1-mo-old JR5558 mice, hypercitrullinated GFAP and PAD4 accumulate in MG endfeet/cell processes in a lesion-specific manner. Finally, we show that human donor maculae from patients with wet-AMD also feature the canonical endfeet localization of hypercitrullinated GFAP. Thus, we propose that endfeet are a "citrullination bunker" that initiates and sustains citrullination in retinal degeneration.Entities:
Keywords: GFAP; Muller glial endfeet; citrullination; gliosis; retinal degeneration
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35197297 PMCID: PMC8917347 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2121875119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Citrullination and PAD4 in reactive MG after laser injury. (A–F) Representative images of retinal sections from uninjured and postinjured mice immunostained for GFAP (green) and citrullination (F95, red). Nuclei were visualized with DAPI (blue). Asterisks demark laser injury site. (M) Orthogonal projections of confocal z-stacks stained for GFAP (red) and F95 (green) at high magnification. (G–L) Representative images of retinal sections from uninjured and postinjured mice immunostained for GFAP (red) and PAD4 (green). (N) Orthogonal projections of confocal z-stacks stained for GFAP (red) and PAD4 (green). (Scale bars, 105 μm.) (O and P) Representative images of retinas from laser injured control and PAD4cKO (KO) mice immunostained for cit-GFAP. GCL, ganglion cell layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer. WB analysis of retinal extracts subjected to denaturing and reducing conditions from laser-injured control and KO retinas probed for citrullination (F95; Q) and PAD4 (S). (U) Quantitation of F95 reactive bands and PAD4 were normalized to stain-free gels (R and T), respectively (n = 5 blots; error bars are SD of mean; *P = 0.004, **P = 0.0159, ***P = 0.0159, ****P = 0.0278, *****P = 0.004) using one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 2.Citrullinated GFAP in MG endfeet of JR5558 mouse and human wet-AMD diseased retinase. Localization of cit-GFAP in JR5558 mouse retinas and human wet-AMD macula. One-month-old JR5558 mouse retinas were immunostained for GFAP, citrullination (F95), cit-GFAP, and PAD4. Lesion-specific staining for GFAP (A; green) overlaps with staining with F95 (B; red) and is seen in the merged image (C). Representative higher magnification images show F95 colocalization with GFAP in endfeet (D). Representative higher magnification images of GFAP staining (E; green) and PAD4 (F; magenta) showing colocalization (G). Cit-GFAP staining in a 2-mo-old JR5558 mouse retina (H) with higher magnification revealed at endfeet (I). Asterisks mark the site of spontaneous retinal lesions. (J–O) Representative tissue sections from 89-y-old wet-AMD and age-matched control donor maculae stained for GFAP (green) and cit-GFAP (red). The endfeet expression of cit-GFAP in wet-AMD macula is revealed in high magnification images showing overlap with GFAP staining (M–O; arrowheads), whereas staining in controls is low (K) and overlaps minimally with GFAP (L). NFL, nerve fiber layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer. (Scale bar, 10 μm.).