Literature DB >> 35197168

Use of a molecular bacterial load assay to distinguish between active TB and post-TB lung disease.

P M Mbelele1, W Sabiiti2, S K Heysell3, E Sauli4, E A Mpolya4, S Mfinanga5, S H Gillespie2, K K Addo6, G Kibiki7, D J Sloan2, S G Mpagama1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35197168      PMCID: PMC8886960          DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.21.0459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis        ISSN: 1027-3719            Impact factor:   3.427


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, We report new diagnostic findings showing that a TB molecular bacterial load assay (TB-MBLA) can distinguish between patients with active TB and post-TB lung disease (PTLD). PTLD is defined as evidence of respiratory disability without active TB among patients who clinically present with chronic respiratory symptoms (e.g., cough and difficulty in breathing) after previous bacteriologically confirmed TB treatment.1,2 Several reports from various settings have described patients with PTLD returning a positive test result for active infection using Xpert® MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) testing.2–5 For example, Ngabonziza et al. reported false-positive Xpert results in 34% of patients in Rwanda,4 whereas Sekyere et al. and Yang et al. reported respectively 45% in South Africa and 46% in China.6,7 The Xpert assay simultaneously detects the presence of DNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and rifampicin-associated mutations in the rpoB gene. Since its endorsement in 2010 by the WHO, the time from diagnosis to treatment of rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant TB (RR/MDR-TB) in Tanzania has decreased from 9 months to less than 2 months.8 However, in individuals being investigated for recurrent TB, Xpert is unable to differentiate between the DNA of live or dead MTBC, leading to false-positive results.9 The DNA of MTBC is stable and may be detected using Xpert up to 5 years after TB treatment.9 Previous attempts to distinguish between live and dead DNA of MTBC using Xpert included pre-treating sputum samples with propidium monoazide (Biotium Inc, Hayward, CA, USA), a chemical that selectively intercalates dead DNA and therefore inhibits its amplification and detection.10 This approach had low specificity, at 71%, for detecting active TB compared to the gold standard mycobacterial culture.10 From a clinical point of view, it has been suggested that individuals with low or very low MTBC false-positive Xpert results require a repeat test using another specimen.4,11 Other groups have withheld anti-TB medications and trialed broad-spectrum antibiotics to determine symptomatic response before further TB investigation.12 TB-MBLA is a quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) test that uses 16S rRNA to detect and quantify viable MTBC strains. Previous longitudinal studies among patients treated for RR/MDR and drug-susceptible TB showed an overall moderate positive correlation in time to sputum conversion from positive to negative between TB-MBLA and solid Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture (r = 0.46, 95% CI 0.36–0.55); P < 0.001)].13 Similarly, another study demonstrated an increase in correlation between TB-MBLA and MGIT liquid culture in detecting active TB from 0.66 (95% CI 0.56–0.74) pre-treatment to 0.73 (95% CI 0.44–0.89) at Month 1 of treatment.14 The need to develop an optimal approach for discriminating between PTLD and recurrent TB has recently been prioritised.15 To address this, we integrated TB-MBLA into a routine TB testing algorithm. In 2019, we consecutively recruited 41 adult patients aged ≥18 years, including 8 patients with RR-susceptible and 33 patients RR/MDR-TB who were referred to Kibong’oto Infectious Diseases Hospital from various clinics with positive MTBC detected using Xpert. The quantity of MTBC was scored as high, medium, low and very low if detected using Xpert at a cycle threshold (CT) value of respectively <16, 16–22, 23–28 or >28. Inclusion criteria were evidence of chronic respiratory symptoms, including cough, chest pain with or without haemoptysis and weight loss with a positive Xpert result 1 year after completing TB treatment. Prior to study procedures, all patients provided informed consent approved by the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/2662). Patients provided one pre-treatment early morning sputum sample for testing using smear microscopy (SM), LJ culture, GenoType MTBDRplus (Hain Lifesciences, Nehren, Germany) and TB-MBLA, as previously described.5,13 We also performed GenoType Mycobacterium CM v2.0 (Hain Lifesciences) testing for non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) detection in samples with positive LJ-culture result but negative on MTBDRplus and TB-MBLA. Based on original Xpert results, all patients received first- or second-line anti-TB treatment regimens in accordance with Tanzania guidelines. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and microbiological results of 41 previously treated individuals are shown in the Table. Among 41 patients, 23 had high or medium MTBC result. Of these, respectively 16 (70%), 20 (87%) and 23 (100%) had TB by positive SM, LJ-culture and both MTBDRplus and TB-MBLA. The remaining 18 (44%) patients had very low MTBC quantity from the original Xpert result. This very low MTBC burden was common in patients with PTLD compared to those with active TB disease (15, 100% vs. 3, 12%; P < 0.001). Active TB in three patients with very low MTBC burden on the original Xpert result was confirmed using both LJ culture and TB-MBLA (n = 1) and TB-MBLA (n = 2), and all had cavitary disease on chest radiograph (Table). Low bacterial burden could partially be attributed to immunodeficient-disease severity in two malnourished patients (body mass index: 14.9 kg/m2 and 16.3 kg/m2) and in a person living with HIV/AIDS (n = 1).16 Overall, 15/41 (36.6%) patients in our cohort had no TB detectable by any other tests, and were therefore presumed to have PTLD. TB-MBLA results were 93% (95% CI 82–99) concordant with LJ-culture in discerning active TB and non-TB disease in 41 patients. There were discordant results from three patients with low MTBC burden, including two patients who had positive TB-MBLA, but negative LJ Culture. It is evident that this discordance can be attributable to 1) the presence of viable MTB detectable using TB-MBLA, but not culturable; 2) the use of solid LJ, which is less sensitive than liquid culture; 3) sampling error; and 4) unclearly established survival time of RNA in sputum after TB treatment. One patient had positive culture but negative TB-MBLA, and was later confirmed to have M. intracellulare, a common NTM species in previously treated patients, which may contribute to PTLD pathology. Moreover, 8/15 (53%) patients had prior exposure to silica dust, with chest radiological features suggestive of silicosis. A combination of previous TB treatment and silicosis could also explain the reported chronic respiratory symptoms in patients with PTLD.
Table

Clinical characteristics, microbiological results and treatment outcomes of 41 previously treated individuals

Baseline characteristicOverall (n = 41) n (%)TB (n = 26) n (%)Presumed PTLD (n = 15) n (%)P value
Age, years, mean ± SD41 ± 1238 ± 1146 ± 120.044
SexMale31 (76)19 (76)12 (76)0.719
Female10 (24)7 (24)3 (24)
HIV statusPositive12 (29)9 (31)3 (20)0.479
Negative29 (71)17 (69)12 (80)
SilicosisYes18 (44)7 (27)11 (73)0.022
No23 (56)19 (73)4 (27)
Cigarette smokingYes21 (51)13 (50)8 (53)0.993
No20 (49)13 (50)7 (47)
Number of TB episodes prior to current diagnosis124 (59)16 (61)8 (53)0.898
212 (29)7 (27)5 (34)
≥35 (12)3 (12)2 (13)
Time since the last TB treatment, years, median (min - max)3 (1–19)3 (1–17)2.5 (1–19)0.693
Chest radiological featuresNormal1 (20 (0)1 (7)<0.001
Cavities17 (42)17 (65)0 (0)
Cavity and fibrosis10 (24)8 (31)2 (13)
Fibrosis13 (32)1 (4)12 (80)
Smear microscopy resultsPositive18 (44)17 (65)1 (7)<0.001
Negative23 (56)9 (35)14 (93)
LJ culture resultsPositive24 (59)23 (88)1 (7)<0.001
Negative17 (41)3 (12)14 (93)
Xpert scoreHigh13 (32)13 (50)0 (0)<0.001
Medium9 (22)9 (35)0 (0)
Low1 (2)1 (4)0 (0)
Very low18 (44)3 (12)15 (100)
Line-probe assayPositive23 (56)23 (88)0 (0)<0.001
Negative18 (44)3 (12)15 (100)
TB-MBLAPositive23 (56)23 (88)0 (0)<0.001
Negative18 (44)3 (12)15 (100)
Programmatic treatment outcomesCured29 (71)18 (69)11 (73)0.138
Completed10 (24)8 (31)2 (13)
Failed1 (2)0 (0)1 (7)
Died1 (2)0 (0)1 (7)

PTLD = post-TB lung disease; SD = standard deviation; LJ = Löwenstein-Jensen; MBLA = molecular bacterial load assay.

Clinical characteristics, microbiological results and treatment outcomes of 41 previously treated individuals PTLD = post-TB lung disease; SD = standard deviation; LJ = Löwenstein-Jensen; MBLA = molecular bacterial load assay. Our results support the use of TB-MBLA to distinguish between active TB and non-TB disease, including PTLD, among symptomatic patients being investigated for recurrent TB and presenting with a low/very low Xpert test results. PTLD is an important medical condition that is under-recognised in high TB burden settings such as Tanzania. Our prior survey to determine the burden of PTLD revealed chronic respiratory symptoms and bronchitis in respectively 98 (45%) and 24 (11%) of 219 people with prior TB treatment.1 These findings support the integration of TB-MBLA in diagnostic tests to distinguish between TB and PTLD in individuals with low MTBC burden and chest fibrotic changes. This may be of even further value when using the Xpert Ultra (Cepheid) platform, with its higher sensitivity but limitations in identifying “trace” results as true-positives.3 Given the small sample size tested here, validation of a proposed TB-MBLA algorithm would require a prospective study that includes evaluating its accuracy and clinical outcomes.
  16 in total

1.  Xpert MTB/RIF Results in Patients With Previous Tuberculosis: Can We Distinguish True From False Positive Results?

Authors:  Grant Theron; Rouxjeane Venter; Greg Calligaro; Liezel Smith; Jason Limberis; Richard Meldau; Duncan Chanda; Aliasgar Esmail; Jonny Peter; Keertan Dheda
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Propidium monoazide and Xpert MTB/RIF to quantify Mycobacterium tuberculosis cells.

Authors:  Xavier A Kayigire; Sven O Friedrich; Miriam N Karinja; Lize van der Merwe; Neil A Martinson; Andreas H Diacon
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 3.131

3.  Management of false-positive rifampicin resistant Xpert MTB/RIF.

Authors:  Natalie Beylis; Yonas Ghebrekristos; Mark Nicol
Journal:  Lancet Microbe       Date:  2020-10-07

4.  Prevalence and drivers of false-positive rifampicin-resistant Xpert MTB/RIF results: a prospective observational study in Rwanda.

Authors:  Jean Claude Semuto Ngabonziza; Tom Decroo; Patrick Migambi; Yves Mucyo Habimana; Armand Van Deun; Conor J Meehan; Gabriela Torrea; Faridath Massou; Willem Bram de Rijk; Bertin Ushizimpumu; Esdras Belamo Niyigena; Emil Ivan; Jules Mugabo Semahore; Jean Baptiste Mazarati; Corinne Simone Merle; Philip Supply; Dissou Affolabi; Leen Rigouts; Bouke Catherine de Jong
Journal:  Lancet Microbe       Date:  2020-06-08

5.  The burden and determinants of post-TB lung disease.

Authors:  S G Mpagama; K S Msaji; O Kaswaga; L J Zurba; P M Mbelele; B W Allwood; B-S Ngungwa; R M Kisonga; M Lesosky; J Rylance; K Mortimer
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults.

Authors:  David J Horne; Mikashmi Kohli; Jerry S Zifodya; Ian Schiller; Nandini Dendukuri; Deanna Tollefson; Samuel G Schumacher; Eleanor A Ochodo; Madhukar Pai; Karen R Steingart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-07

7.  Clinical standards for the assessment, management and rehabilitation of post-TB lung disease.

Authors:  G B Migliori; F M Marx; N Ambrosino; E Zampogna; H S Schaaf; M M van der Zalm; B Allwood; A L Byrne; K Mortimer; R S Wallis; G J Fox; C C Leung; J M Chakaya; B Seaworth; A Rachow; B J Marais; J Furin; O W Akkerman; F Al Yaquobi; A F S Amaral; S Borisov; J A Caminero; A C C Carvalho; D Chesov; L R Codecasa; R C Teixeira; M P Dalcolmo; S Datta; A-T Dinh-Xuan; R Duarte; C A Evans; J-M García-García; G Günther; G Hoddinott; S Huddart; O Ivanova; R Laniado-Laborín; S Manga; K Manika; A Mariandyshev; F C Q Mello; S G Mpagama; M Muñoz-Torrico; P Nahid; C W M Ong; D J Palmero; A Piubello; E Pontali; D R Silva; R Singla; A Spanevello; S Tiberi; Z F Udwadia; M Vitacca; R Centis; L D Ambrosio; G Sotgiu; C Lange; D Visca
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.427

8.  Clinical Characteristics and Radiologic Features of Immunocompromised Patients With Pauci-Bacillary Pulmonary Tuberculosis Receiving Delayed Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Joung Ha Park; Jooae Choe; Moonsuk Bae; Sungim Choi; Kyung Hwa Jung; Min Jae Kim; Yong Pil Chong; Sang-Oh Lee; Sang-Ho Choi; Yang Soo Kim; Jun Hee Woo; Kyung-Wook Jo; Tae Sun Shim; Mi Young Kim; Sung-Han Kim
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.835

9.  Persistent chronic respiratory symptoms despite TB cure is poorly correlated with lung function.

Authors:  B W Allwood; M Stolbrink; N Baines; E Louw; D T Wademan; A Lupton-Smith; S Nel; D Maree; S Mpagama; M Osman; F M Marx; G Hoddinott; M Lesosky; J Rylance; K Mortimer
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  A Comparative Evaluation of the New Genexpert MTB/RIF Ultra and other Rapid Diagnostic Assays for Detecting Tuberculosis in Pulmonary and Extra Pulmonary Specimens.

Authors:  John Osei Sekyere; Nontobeko Maphalala; Lesibana A Malinga; Nontombi M Mbelle; Nontuthuko E Maningi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosing Tuberculosis: What Do New Technologies Allow Us to (Not) Do?

Authors:  Shima M Abdulgader; Anna O Okunola; Gcobisa Ndlangalavu; Byron W P Reeve; Brian W Allwood; Coenraad F N Koegelenberg; Rob M Warren; Grant Theron
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.966

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.