| Literature DB >> 35197096 |
Paolo Cavarzere1, Andrea Gastaldi2, Francesca Marta Elli3, Rossella Gaudino2,4, Erika Peverelli3, Milena Brugnara2, Susanne Thiele5, Francesca Granata6, Giovanna Mantovani3, Franco Antoniazzi2,4,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: GNAS is a complex gene that encodes Gsα, a signaling protein that triggers a complex network of pathways. Heterozygous inactivating mutations in Gsα-coding GNAS exons cause hormonal resistance; on the contrary, activating mutations in Gsα result in constitutive cAMP stimulation. Recent research has described a clinical condition characterized by both gain and loss of Gsα function, due to a heterozygous de novo variant of the maternal GNAS allele. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe a girl with a complex combination of clinical signs and a new heterozygous GNAS variant. For the molecular analysis of GNAS gene, DNA samples of the proband and her parents were extracted from their peripheral blood samples. In silico analysis was performed to predict the possible in vivo effect of the detected novel genetic variant. The activity of Gsα protein was in vitro analyzed from samples of erythrocyte membranes, recovered from heparinized blood samples.Entities:
Keywords: Congenital bone abnormalities; GNAS gene; Hyponatremia; Precocious thelarche; Subclinical hyperthyroidism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35197096 PMCID: PMC8867619 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02252-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1Growth chart of our patient. We also report the different symptoms in chronological order of appearance
Fig. 2Bone abnormalities. A Pelvic X-ray of our patient evidenced right coxa vara. B Evolution of bone age through years. The progressive shape change of metacarpals that took a tubular form appears evident
Fig. 3Electropherogram of the novel GNAS variant by Sanger sequencing
Fig. 4Analysis of Gsα protein expression levels. Representative immunoblot and densitometrical analysis showing Gsα expression among the Family members. Red cell membrane protein exctracts were obtained from all samples, and two separate Western blot experiments were performed (n = 2). GAPDH was used as housekeeping gene for normalization. Results represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) and are expressed as fold-increase vs proband. No statistically significant difference was found between samples. (Pt = patient)
Results of the in silico prediction analysis of pathogenicity of the novel GNAS variant
| Germline allelic variant | Pathogenicity Prediction/Score | Conservation score | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varsome (Genome Interpretor)* | ACMG/AMP* criteria | DANN(a) | Mutation Taster(b) | FATHMM-MKL(c) | EIGEN(d) | GERP(e) | PhyloP100way(f) | PhastCons100way(g) | fitCons (GM12878/ H1-hESC/ HUVEC)(h) | Integrated fitCons(i) | bstatistic(l) | |
NM_0011077488: c.166A > T p.I56F | Likely pathogenic | PM1#1 moderate PM2#2 moderate PP2#3 supporting PP3#4 supporting | 0.99 | Disease causing | Damaging | Pathogenic | 5,63 | 8.95 | 1 | 0.67/0,68/0,72 | 0.65 | 986 |
*The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) criteria: #1 Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical ± 1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multiexon deletion) in a gene where LOF is a known mechanism of disease—#2 Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or Exome Aggregation Consortium—#3 Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)—#4 Pathogenic computational verdict based on 13 pathogenic predictions vs no benign predictions; (a) pathogenicity scoring methodology based on deep neural networks; (b) the pathogenicity of a variant based on evolutionary conservation, splice-site, mRNA, protein and regulatory features; (c) predict the functional consequences of non-coding and coding single nucleotide variants (SNVs); (d) spectral approach to the functional annotation of genetic variants in coding and noncoding regions; (e) Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling, a conservation score calculated by quantifying substitution deficits across multiple alignments of orthologues using the genomes of 35 mammals; (f) Phylogenetic P-values, scores based on multiple alignments of 99 vertebrate genome sequences to the human genome; (g) identify evolutionarily conserved elements in a multiple alignment, given a phylogenetic tree, based on 100 vertebrate genomes (including human); (h) FITness CONSequences of functional annotation, identifies genomic regions under selective pressure by integrating epigenomic signals from three ENCODE cell lines (GM12878, H1-hESC and HUVEC) with selective pressure inferred using the INSIGHT ((Inference of Natural Selection from Interspersed Genomically coHerent elemenTs) method; (i) integrates functional assays (such as ChIP-Seq) with selective pressure inferred using the INSIGHT method.; (l) indicates the expected fraction of neutral diversity that is present at a site, based on human single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data
Exonic nonsynonymous variants identified by NGS target sequecing
| Chr | Start | End | Ref | Alt | dbSNP | Otherinfo | Func.refgene | Gene.refgene | ExonicFunc.refgene | AAChange.refgene | 1000G_ALL | 1000G_AFR | 1000G_AMR | 1000G_EAS | 1000G_EUR | 1000G_SAS | In silico/db prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chr12 | 20522252 | 20522252 | G | A | rs12305038 | exonic | PDE3A | nonsyn SNV | PDE3A:NM_000921: exon1:c.G34A:p.D12N | 0.33 | 0.51 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.24 | Benign | |
| chr20 | 57244396 | 57244396 | G | A | rs41276950 | exonic | STX16 | nonsyn SNV | STX16:NM_001134772: exon4:c.G431A:p.R144Q NM_003763: exon4:c.G380A:p.R127Q | 0.014 | 0.0023 | 0.016 | 0.054 | 0.0041 | Benign | ||
| chr20 | 57470693 | 57470693 | A | T | het | exonic | GNAS | nonsyn SNV | GNAS:NM_001077488: exon2:c.A166T:p.I56F | Novel:pathogenetic |
Fig. 5GNAS locus copy number and methylation status analysis by MS-MLPA