| Literature DB >> 35196987 |
Chaira Serrarens1, Maarten Otter2,3,4, Bea C M Campforts2, Constance T R M Stumpel5, Henk Jansma6, Thérèse A M J van Amelsvoort2, Claudia Vingerhoets2,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Triple X syndrome (47,XXX) is a relatively common sex chromosomal aneuploidy characterized by the presence of a supernumerary X chromosome in females and has been associated with a variable cognitive, behavioural and psychiatric phenotype. 47,XXX may serve as a suitable model for studying the effect of genetic architecture on brain morphology. Previous studies have shown alterations in brain structure in 47,XXX particularly in childhood and adolescence. In this study, we examined subcortical and cortical brain morphology in adult women with 47,XXX using ultra-high field 7T MRI. Given previous evidence of impaired social functioning and emotion recognition in adults with 47,XXX, we also investigated the relationship of these functions with brain morphology.Entities:
Keywords: 47,XXX; 7T; Adults; Cortical folding; Cortical surface area; Cortical thickness; Social cognition; Social functioning; Subcortical volume
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35196987 PMCID: PMC8903568 DOI: 10.1186/s11689-022-09425-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurodev Disord ISSN: 1866-1947 Impact factor: 4.025
Sample demographics
| 47,XXX | Healthy controls | Statistic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 30.14 (11.84) | 33.86 (12.43) | 0.279 | |
| FSIQ | 85.81(10.44) | 99.73 (12.32) | < .001* |
FSIQ: full-scale intelligence quotient; *p-value < .05
Summary of ERT and SRS-A T-scores
| 47,XXX | Healthy controls | Statistic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social cognitiona | ||||||
| ERT score | 21 | 101.33 (17.56) | 22 | 119.59 (14.05) | < .001* | |
| Social functioningb | ||||||
| Social awareness score | 20 | 56.85 (10.73) | 22 | 49.36 (11.24) | 0.033* | |
| Social communication score | 20 | 55.85 (7.89) | 22 | 46.86 (7.82) | < .001* | |
| Social motivation score | 20 | 54.75 (8.08) | 22 | 45.64 (7.34) | < .001* | |
| Rigidity and repetitive behaviour score | 20 | 53.50 (9.70) | 22 | 48.86 (10.45) | 0.090 | |
| Total score | 20 | 56.05 (8.02) | 22 | 47.32 (9.47) | 0.003* | |
a Measured using the CANTAB. b Measured using the SRS-A questionnaire. ERT: emotion recognition task; *p-value < .05
Results for volume of each subcortical region of interest for the 47,XXX subjects versus healthy controls comparison controlling for FSIQ and ICV
| Cohen’s | Standard error | 95 % CI | FDR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICV | −0.197 | 0.306 | −0.797–0.402 | 0.521 |
| Left accumbens | −0.873 | 0.320 | −1.500 to −0.246 | 0.015* |
| Left amygdala | −0.381 | 0.308 | −0.985–0.222 | 0.248 |
| Left caudate | −0.888 | 0.320 | −1.516 to −0.260 | 0.015* |
| Left hippocampus | −0.854 | 0.319 | −1.480 to −0.229 | 0.015* |
| Left lateral ventricle | 1.073 | 0.327 | 0.431–1.714 | 0.010* |
| Left pallidum | −0.481 | 0.310 | −1.088–0.126 | 0.161 |
| Left putamen | −0.695 | 0.315 | −1.312 to −0.079 | 0.040* |
| Left thalamus | −0.694 | 0.315 | −1.310 to −0.077 | 0.040* |
| Right accumbens | −0.451 | 0.309 | −1.057–0.155 | 0.179 |
| Right amygdala | −0.354 | 0.308 | −0.957–0.249 | 0.268 |
| Right caudate | −0.853 | 0.319 | −1.479 to −0.227 | 0.015* |
| Right hippocampus | −0.954 | 0.323 | −1.587 to −0.322 | 0.015* |
| Right lateral ventricle | 0.727 | 0.315 | 0.108–1.345 | 0.038* |
| Right pallidum | −0.868 | 0.320 | −1.494 to −0.241 | 0.015* |
| Right putamen | −1.197 | 0.332 | −1.848 to −0.545 | 0.006* |
| Right thalamus | −0.856 | 0.319 | −1.482 to −0.230 | 0.015* |
HC: healthy controls; CI: confidence interval; ICV: intracranial volume; FDR: false-discovery rate; *FDR p-value < .05
Fig. 1Subcortical volume differences between 47,XXX women and healthy controls. Effect sizes for significant differences in volumes of subcortical brain regions between 47,XXX subjects and healthy controls. Negative effect sizes indicate lower subcortical brain volume in 47,XXX subjects compared to healthy controls
Fig. 2Cortical surface area differences between 47,XXX women and healthy controls. Effect sizes for significant differences in surface area of cortical brain regions between 47,XXX subjects and healthy controls. Negative effect sizes indicate lower cortical surface area in 47,XXX subjects compared to healthy controls
Fig. 3Correlation between cortical thickness regions and social cognition in 47,XXX. Correlations for significant relationships between cortical thickness regions and ERT scores in 47,XXX subjects