Literature DB >> 35196749

COVID-19-Associated Encephalopathy: Systematic Review of Case Reports.

Yusak Mangara Tua Siahaan1,2, Vivien Puspitasari1,3, Aristo Pangestu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) primarily attacks the respiratory system, but there are also several reports of the involvement of the central nervous system, with one of the manifestations being encephalopathy. The relatively new emergence of COVID-19 means that few studies have investigated the clinical profile of encephalopathy associated with this disease. This study aimed to determine the clinical profile, laboratory, and imaging results of encephalopathy associated with COVID-19.
METHODS: Three databases, namely PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, were systematically searched for case reports and case series related to COVID-19-associated encephalopathy published from January 1, 2019 to July 20, 2020.
RESULTS: This review included 24 studies involving 33 cases. The most-reported neurological symptoms were disorientation/confusion (72.72%), decreased consciousness (54.54%), and seizures (27.27%). Laboratory examinations revealed increases in the C-reactive protein level (48.48%), the lactate dehydrogenase level (30.30%), and lymphopenia (27.27%). Brain imaging did not produce any pathological findings in 51.51% of the cases. Electroencephalography showed generalized slowing in 45.45% of the cases. Elevated protein (42.42%) and lymphocytosis (24.24%) were found in the cerebrospinal fluid. Fifteen patients were reportedly discharged from the hospital in a stable condition, while four cases of mortality were recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings in this review support the hypothesis that cerebral damage in COVID-19-associated encephalopathy is caused by cytokine-immune-mediated inflammation rather than by direct invasion.
Copyright © 2022 Korean Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; encephalitis; encephalopathy; nerve inflammation; neuro immune

Year:  2022        PMID: 35196749      PMCID: PMC8926776          DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2022.18.2.194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurol        ISSN: 1738-6586            Impact factor:   3.077


INTRODUCTION

In January 2020, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified as the cause of an outbreak of pneumonia that developed into respiratory failure in Wuhan, China.1 The spread of SARS-CoV-2 subsequently expanded and led to an increase in the number of fatalities, with it being declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020.2 As of July 2020, there were 15 million confirmed cases and more than 600,000 deaths.3 SARS-CoV-2 commonly attacks the respiratory system, causing a type of pneumonia called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has the initial symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection that rapidly develops into respiratory failure.45 While respiratory disorder is the main clinical manifestation of COVID-19, some studies have found that most patients also experience neurological symptoms.67 Helms et al.7 found neurological symptoms in 84% of the patients who entered an intensive care unit (ICU) without sedation and neuromuscular blockers, with symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction such as agitation (69%) and confusion (65%). A systematic review by Ghannam et al.8 found that 23% of patients also had complications of encephalopathy. The results of both of these previous studies indicated the possibility of CNS involvement in the course of COVID-19, with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 neurotropism.8 The relatively new emergence of COVID-19 means that few studies have investigated the clinical profile of encephalopathy associated with this disease. There have been some reported cases of encephalopathy related to COVID-19, with varying clinical appearance and laboratory and imaging findings. The present study performed a systematic review with the aim of identifying the clinical profile and findings from laboratory and imaging investigations on encephalopathy associated with COVID-19.

METHODS

This review conformed to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) statement (Fig. 1).9
Fig. 1

Flow chart of study selection.

Search strategy

Two authors (V.P. and A.P.) searched three databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. Eligible titles and abstracts were marked for further review and screening. The articles included were only those published in English from January 1, 2019 to July 20, 2020. The search terms used were “COVID-19,” “SARS-CoV-2,” and “encephalopathy.” If a publication could not be accessed physically or digitally, the authors were contacted by email. The agreement between two of the present authors in selecting case reports was calculated using the Cohen’s kappa (κ) statistic, which was reported with the 95% CI. The risk of bias were calculated using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-1) assessment tool.10

Study selection

The studies included in this review were prospective or retrospective case reports or case series of encephalopathy patients related to COVID-19, while experimental studies were excluded. All potentially relevant articles were screened for eligibility. Publications that were not in English were excluded.

Data extraction

Data were extracted from all eligible reports by two authors (V.P. and A.P.). The extracted data included bibliographic information, demographic information, symptom onset, clinical symptoms (respiratory and neurological), investigation results (laboratory, imaging, and electroencephalography), therapy, and outcome. All disagreements were resolved by discussion between two authors [V.P. and A.P.].) with supervision by a third author (Y.M.T.S.). The collected data were entered into a Microsoft Excel worksheet. General data values were expressed as the percentage and number of patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies involving 33 patients with encephalopathy and COVID-19 were collected from the 3 databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase).111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334 The patients comprised 11 females and 22 males aged 47.90±16.65 years (mean±SD). The onset of respiratory or systemic symptoms occurred 6.0±4.3 days after respiratory/systemic symptoms, while CNS disorders appeared after 11.10±7.85 days; however, in two cases the neurological symptom appeared 1–3 days earlier than the respiratory symptoms. Demographic data are provided in Table 1. The agreement in selecting case reports between the two authors was excellent, as shown by a Cohen’s κ statistic of 0.95 (95% CI=0.93–0.98). Assessments performed using the ROBINS-I assessment tool showed a low risk of bias.
Table 1

Clinical profile and demographic data of the 24 studies including 33 cases

AuthorCountryAge and sexRespiratory/ systemic symptom onsetSymptomsOnsetMethod of COVID-19 diagnosisCSF profileBrain imaging (CT/MRI)EEGCytokines profile
Duong et al.11USA41 years, femaleNRSeizureNRRT-PCRLymphocytic pleocytosis, increased RBCNormal brain CT with contrastGeneralized slowing with no epileptic dischargeNR
Bernard-Valnet et al.12Switzerland64 years, female5 daysTonic-clonic seizures, disorientation, psychosisAcute (not specified)RT-PCRLymphocytic pleocytosis, increased proteinNormal brain MRINonconvulsive focal status epilepticusNR
67 years, female17 daysHeadache, confusedFew hours before admissionRT-PCRLymphocytic pleocytosis, increased proteinNormal brain MRINRNR
Ye et al.13ChinaMale (age NR)4 daysAltered consciousness, confusionAcute (not specified)RT-PCRNormalNormal brain CTNRNR
McAbee et al.14USA11 years, male2 daysStatus epilepticusAcute (not specified)RT-PCRNeutrophilic pleocytosis, increased protein and RBCNormal brain CTFrontal intermittent delta activityNR
Andriuta et al.15FranceMiddle-aged female7 daysGait disturbance, hypopallesthesia, bladder and bowel incontinenceProgressively developed on day 16 of admissionRT-PCRNRBrain MRI: medial mesencephalic hyperintensityNormalNR
Middle-aged maleNRAltered consciousness, flaccid tetraparesisNRRT-PCRNRBrain MRI: bilateral diffuse white-matter hyperintensitiesNRNR
Chaumont et al.16France69 years, male7 daysConfusion, headache1 day before admissionRT-PCR/CTLymphocytic pleocytosis, increased proteinNormal brain MRIBilateral slowingNR
Sohal and Mansur17USA72 years, maleNRWeakness, lightheadedness, seizureDay 3 of admissionRT-PCRNRBrain CT: chronic microvascular changesSix left temporal seizuresNR
Pilotto et al.18Italy60 years, male2 daysAltered consciousness5 days before admissionRT-PCRLymphocytic pleocytosis, increased proteinNormal brain CTGeneralized slowing with reduced reactivity to acoustic stimuliIncreased IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and β2-microglobulin
Al-Olama et al.19UAE36 years, male2 daysDrowsy, headache4 days after respiratory symptomRT-PCRNRBrain CT: right frontal intracerebral hematoma with subarachnoid hemorrhage in ipsilateral sylvian fissure and frontal and temporal lobes suggestive of viral encephalitisNRNR
Moriguchi et al.20Japan24 years, male1 dayGeneralized seizure, unconsciousness9 days after respiratory symptomCT/RT-PCR CSFIncreased opening pressure, mononuclear pleocytosisRight lateral ventriculitis and encephalitis in right mesial lobe and hippocampusNRNR
Vandervorst et al.21Belgium29 years, male7 daysGeneralized weakness, disorientation10 days after respiratory symptomRT-PCRNormalHyperintensity in the left medial temporal lobe with mild gyral expansionGeneral excess beta rhythm with left temporal delta activityNR
Wong et al.22UK40 years, male10 daysUnsteady gaitDay 3 of admissionRT-PCRNormalSuggestive of inflammatory rhombencephalitis/ myelitisNRNR
Zandifar and Zandifar23Iran49 years, male2 daysTonic–clonic seizure, altered consciousnessAcute (not specified)Clinical, imaging, and exclusion of other possibilitiesPleocytosis, increased proteinDiffuse brain edemaNRNR
39 years, male5 daysTonic seizure, altered consciousness, disorientationDay 3 of admissionRT-PCRNRNRNRNR
Farhadian et al.24USA78 years, female2 daysUncontrolled limb movements3 days before admissionRT-PCRBrain MRI: atrophy and patchy periventricular and subcortical white matter hyperintensitiesMild generalized slowingIncreased IL-6, IL-8, and IFN-γ-induced protein 10
Chalil et al.25Canada48 years, female14 daysAltered consciousnessDay 15 of admissionRT-PCR+CTNeutrophilic pleocytosisBrain CT: extensive bilateral parietal and occipital intraparenchymal hemorrhage and interventricualr extension with hydrocephalusNRNR
Afshar et al.26Iran39 years, female9 daysAltered consciousness, tonic–clonic seizure1 day after respiratory symptomClinical, imaging, and serologyNormalBrain MRI: hyperintensities in bilateral thalami, medial temporal lobe, and ponsNRNR
Bodro et al.27Spain25 years, male1 dayConfusion and agitation12 hours after respiratory symptomRT-PCRLymphocytic pleocytosis, increased proteinNormal brain CT and MRINRNR
49 years, male7 daysDisorientationFew hours after admissionRT-PCRLymphocytic pleocytosis, increased proteinNormal brain CT and MRINRNR
Abdi et al.28Iran58 years, maleNo complaintAltered consciousness1 month, progressive over 2 daysRT-PCRIncreased glucoseBrain MRI: diffuse confluent white-matter hyperintensitiesNRNR
Delamarre et al.29France51 years, male10 daysAltered consciousness11 days after respiratory symptomRT-PCRAlbumin-cytological dissociationBrain MRI: bilateral hyperintensities in bilateral thalamiLow-voltage symmetrical delta activity
Huang et al.30USA40 years, femaleNRSyncope and altered mental statusNRRT-PCRNormalNRNRNR
Khoo et al.31UK65 years, femaleRespiratory symptoms at 2 weeks before admissionInvoluntary movements, diplopia, cognitive decline7 days before admissionRT-PCRNormalNormal brain MRINormalNR
Zambreanu et al.32UK66 years, femaleNRAltered consciousness, confusionFew hours before admissionRT-PCRIncreased proteinHyperintensities in mesial temporal lobes and medial thalamiNRNR
Panariello et al.33Italy23 years, maleNRPsychosis3 daysRT-PCRNormalNormal6 Hz theta activityIncreased IL-6
Dogan et al.34Turkey49 years, maleNRAltered consciousnessNRRT-PCRIncreased proteinSuggestive of encephalitisNRIncreased IL-6
59 years, maleNRAltered consciousnessNRRT-PCRIncreased proteinSuggestive of encephalitisNRIncreased IL-6
59 years, maleNRAltered consciousnessNRRT-PCRIncreased proteinNormalNRNormal
51 years, femaleNRAltered consciousnessNRRT-PCRIncreased proteinNormalNRNormal
55 years, maleNRAltered consciousnessNRRT-PCRIncreased proteinNormalNRNormal
22 years, maleNRAltered consciousnessNRRT-PCRIncreased proteinSuggestive of encephalitisNRIncreased IL-6

COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; EEG, electroencephalography; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; NR, not reported; RBC, red blood cells; RT-PCR, reverse-transcription PCR.

The most-common respiratory/systemic symptoms (Table 2) were fever (54.54%), fatigue/myalgia (48.48%), cough (42.42%), and shortness of breath (30.30%). The most-prominent symptoms of the CNS were disorientation/confusion (72.72%), loss of consciousness (54.54%), and seizures (27.27%). Physical examinations revealed a extensor plantar response, the meningeal irritation sign, and motor weakness in 18.18%, 12.12%, and 12.12% of the cases, respectively. In laboratory examinations, the most frequently recorded findings were increases in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level (48.48%), the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (30.30%), and lymphopenia (27.27%).
Table 2

Summary of the case reports and case series findings

VariableCases (n=33)
Comorbidities
HT7 (21.21)
DM4 (12.12)
Obesity3 (9.09)
CAD1 (3.03)
ESKD1 (3.03)
Kidney transplant1 (3.03)
Dyslipidemia1 (3.03)
AD1 (3.03)
OA1 (3.03)
GERD1 (3.03)
Closed-angle glaucoma1 (3.03)
Autism1 (3.03)
Substance abuse1 (3.03)
COVID-19 systemic/respiratory symptoms
Fever18 (54.54)
Cough14 (42.42)
Nasal congestion3 (9.09)
Sore throat1 (3.03)
Dyspnea10 (30.30)
Fatigue/myalgia16 (48.48)
Headache10 (30.30)
Anosmia3 (3.03)
Ageusia2 (6.06)
Diarrhea4 (12.12)
Neurological symptoms
Loss of consciousness18 (54.54)
Disorientation/confusion24 (72.72)
Hallucination4 (12.12)
Psychotic2 (6.06)
Stiff neck1 (3.03)
Insomnia1 (3.03)
Aphasia2 (6.06)
Seizure
Tonic–clonic5 (15.15)
Tonic1 (3.03)
Myoclonic1 (3.03)
Unspecified2 (6.06)
Involuntary movements3 (9.09)
Unsteadiness3 (9.09)
Diplopia2 (6.06)
Dysphagia1 (3.03)
Incontinence bowel/bladder1 (3.03)
Neurological signs
Meningeal irritation sign4 (12.12)
Pupil anisocoria2 (6.06)
Akinetic mutism3 (9.09)
Motor weakness
Tetraplegia1 (3.03)
Paraplegia1 (3.03)
Hemiplegia2 (6.06)
Sensory deficit2 (6.06)
Extensor plantar response6 (18.18)
Photophobia1 (3.03)
Visual field defect1 (3.03)
Facial weakness1 (3.03)
Tongue weakness1 (3.03)
Nystagmus1 (3.03)
Loss of brainstem reflexes3 (9.09)
Sensory hemineglect1 (3.03)
Ataxia2 (3.03)
Laboratory findings
Lymphopenia9 (27.27)
Leukocytosis8 (24.24)
Leukopenia3 (9.09)
Thrombocytosis3 (9.09)
Thrombocytopenia3 (9.09)
Elevated CRP16 (48.48)
Elevated LDH10 (30.3)
Elevated procalcitonin3 (9.09)
Elevated ESR1 (3.03)
Elevated D-dimer6 (18.18)
Elevated CK3 (9.09)
Elevated AST/ALT2 (6.06)
Elevated LDH1 (3.03)
Chest imaging (n=22)
GGO+consolidation (CT)4 (18.18)
GGO without consolidation (CT)12 (54.54)
Infiltrate/consolidation (X-ray)3 (13.63)
Subpleural condensation (USG)1 (4.54)
Normal2 (9.09)
Brain imaging
Normal17 (51.51)
Diffuse edema1 (3.03)
Hyperintensities
Thalamus3 (9.09)
Cerebellar2 (6.06)
Periventricular2 (6.06)
Mesencephalic3 (9.09)
Pons3 (9.09)
White matter8 (24.24)
Temporal lobe3 (9.09)
Hemorrhagic
Pallidum1 (3.03)
Lobar2 (6.06)
Sulcus (SAH)4 (12.12)
Contrast enhancement4 (12.12)
CSF studies
Elevated WBC9 (27.27)
Elevated neutrophils1 (3.03)
Lymphocytosis8 (24.24)
Elevated RBC5 (15.15)
Elevated protein14 (42.42)
Decreased glucose1 (3.03)
Elevated pressure2 (6.06)
Antineuronal autoantibodies (n=8)
Positive1 (12.50)
Negative7 (87.50)
Inflammatory cytokines (n=7)7 (100)
CSF PCR (n=28)
Positive3 (10.71)
Negative25 (89.28)
EEG (n=11)
Background slowing7 (63.30)
Focal focus
Frontal1 (9.09)
Temporal2 (18.18)
Normal1 (9.09)
Outcomes (n=23)
Discharged15 (65.21)
Death4 (17.39)
Still in treatment4 (17.39)

AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; CAD, coronary artery disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CK, creatinine kinase; DM, diabetes mellitus; EEG, electroencephalography; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; GGO, ground-glass opacity; HT, hypertension; LDH, the lactate dehydrogenase; NR, not reported; OA, osteoarthritis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; USG, ultrasonography; WBC, white blood cells

Chest imaging was reported for 22 studies, with ground-glass opacities (72.72%) as the predominant finding, which is a typical finding in COVID-19 cases. Brain imaging did not produce pathological findings in 51.51% of the cases. Hyperintensity in the white matter was found in 24.24% of the cases. Electroencephalography (EEG) was carried out in 11 cases, with the most-common finding of generalized slowing (45.45%). The most-common findings in analyses of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were elevated protein (42.42%) and lymphocytosis (24.24%). Significant increases in proinflammatory cytokines were found in all five studies (100%) that performed these analyses of the CSF: interleukin (IL)-6,1824273334 IL-1β,27 IL-8,1824 and TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha).18 Antineuronal autoantibodies were only found in one (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA-R])33 out of the eight examined cases2182729313233 (12.5%). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) examination of the CSF for SARS-CoV-2 was carried out in 28 cases, with positive results in 3 cases.192030 PCR examinations of the CSF for other viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), human herpes virus 6, cytomegalovirus, and varicella-zoster virus produced negative results. The most commonly used pharmacological agents (Table 3) were hydroxychloroquine (48.48%), azithromycin (27.27%), and favipiravir (24.24%). Intravenous steroids were given in 8 cases (methylprednisolone in 5,1826293132 dexamethasone in 2,2833 and unspecified in 121), while immunotherapies such as plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) were given to 10 patients (plasmapheresis to 634 and IVIg to 418262932). Fifteen patients (65.21%) were reportedly discharged from the hospital in a stable condition, while four mortality cases (17.39%)172328 were recorded.
Table 3

Pharmacological agents used in studies

ClassificationPharmacological agentCases (n=33)
AntiviralAcyclovir9* (27.27)
Atazanavir1 (3.03)
Arbidol1 (3.03)
Oseltamivir1* (3.03)
Darunavir/cobicistat1 (3.03)
Lopinavir2 (6.06)
Ritonavir2 (6.06)
Favipiravir8 (24.24)
AntibioticCeftriaxone6 (4*; 18.18)
Vancomycin3 (1*; 9.09)
Levofloxacin1 (3.03)
Linezolid1 (3.03)
Piperacillin-tazobactam1 (3.03)
Amoxicillin2 (1*; 6.06)
Ampicillin3* (9.09)
Meropenem1 (3.03)
Azithromycin9 (27.27)
AntiepilepticLevetiracetam6 (18.18)
Clonazepam2 (12.12)
Valproate3 (9.09)
Midazolam2 (6.06)
OtherHydroxychloroquine16 (48.48)
Mannitol1 (3.03)
Norepinephrine1 (3.03)
Methylprednisolone5 (15.15)
Dexamethasone2 (6.06)
Nebivolol1 (3.03)
Amlodipine1 (3.03)
Quetiapine2 (6.06)
Aripiprazole1 (3.03)
Haloperidol2 (6.06)
Promazine1 (3.03)
Paracetamol1 (3.03)
Tocilizumab2 (6.06)
Heparin, protamine sulfate1* (3.03)
Vitamins B and C1 (3.03)
Plasmapheresis6 (18.18)
IVIg4 (12.12)

Data are presented as n (%).

*Administration was stopped before full course completed.

DISCUSSION

Analysis of systematic reviews

The main target of organ damage by SARS-CoV-2 is the respiratory system, but there are several reports of affected patients also experiencing neurological problems ranging from mild manifestations (e.g., headaches and dizziness) to life-threatening complications (e.g., cerebrovascular disorders and encephalitis).6 Helms et al.7 found that agitation (69%) was a common complaint in COVID-19 patients receiving treatment in the ICU. This review found that the common symptoms in encephalopathy patients were disorientation or confusion (72.72%), decreased consciousness (54.54%), and seizures (27.27%). These symptoms indicate damage in the CNS, especially the cerebral cortex, which is typically found in acute encephalopathy. This result was consistent with the clinical manifestations of encephalopathy, where disorientation was the most-common symptom reported in patients with positive HSV PCR (92%).35 Manifestations of seizures and headaches were found in 27.27% and 30.30% of the cases of COVID-19-associated encephalopathy, while HSV encephalitis seizures were found in 56% of the cases and headaches in 83% of the cases.35 Abnormal behavior that is characteristically found in HSV is rarely found in COVID-19 encephalopathy. The clinical appearance of COVID-19-associated encephalopathy was similar to that of encephalopathy associated with MERS-CoV-2 (Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (fever, cough, and fatigue), a decrease in mental status, and rapid respiratory failure.36 The meningeal irritation sign was only found in four cases (12.12%), which indicated that the pathological process was more dominant in the cortex than in the meninges. This also indicated that the involvement of the meninges in COVID-19-associated encephalopathy was less common than that of HSV, since the meningeal irritation sign appeared in 29% of HSV cases.35 However, these results can also be attributed to the loss of meningeal irritation in severe states of consciousness. CSF examinations predominantly showed elevated protein and pleocytosis, suggesting an inflammatory process in the brain that could be caused by an infection such as viral encephalitis, or an autoimmune condition such as limbic encephalitis or Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). The laboratory results showed that the inflammatory markers CRP and LDH as well as lymphopenia were increased in 48.48%, 30.30%, and 27.27% of the cases, respectively. These proportions are higher than those found in the general systematic review of COVID-19 studies conducted by Rodriguez-Morales et al.,37 where increases in CRP and LDH were found in 22.2% and 6.3% of the cases, respectively. These differences are attributable to frequent and severe inflammatory reactions in COVID-19-associated encephalopathy. Wang38 found that CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with severe symptoms than in those with moderate or mild symptoms (54.15 mg/dL vs. 16.76 mg/dL vs. 1.52 mg/dL, p<0.05). The presence of lymphopenia indicated the involvement of T cells, which caused the depletion of CD4 and CD8 cells.3739 Lymphopenia can occur due to lymphocyte sequestration in specific target organs such as the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and lymphoid tissue via the activation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors by SARS-CoV-2. Other hypotheses are that the phenotype and mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 are similar to those of acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), including the tendency for direct bone-marrow suppression, the immune-mediated destruction of lymphocytes,40414243 and lymphopenia manifestation.40 Brain imaging studies did not show significant pathological features in 51.51% of the cases. The most-common pathological finding was diffuse hyperintensity in T2-weighted/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging, most frequently in the white matter (24.24%). These findings were consistent with those of the systematic review conducted by Katal et al.,44 where the proportion of normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images was most frequently found (41%) in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the neuroimaging results for encephalopathy associated with COVID-19 in the present review resembled those of encephalopathy/encephalitis found in the previous coronavirus outbreak. Two cases of SARS-CoV accompanied by severe neurological symptoms in the form of decreased consciousness and seizures had normal neuroimaging results.4445 Arabi et al.36 reported on three Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) patients, whose MRI evaluations revealed that hyperintense lesions in T2-weighted images were spread widely and bilaterally in the white matter and subcortical areas, frontal lobes, temporal, parietal, and basal ganglia, as well as in the corpus callosum. These neuroimaging findings suggest similarities in the pathomechanism of CNS involvement in SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV,46 and MERS-CoV. EEG examinations were performed in 11 cases, with the results showing nonspecific generalized slowing in 7 cases (63.30%) and epileptiform foci in 3 cases (27.27%): 2 in the temporal lobe and 1 in the frontal lobe. This was consistent with Canham et al.47 reporting that the predominant EEG feature in patients with severe COVID-19 was generalized slowing. These findings indicate that COVID-19 exerts diffuse and widespread effects in the CNS, in contrast to encephalitis caused by HSV, where atypical 2–3 Hz periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges originate from the temporal lobes.48 The CSF analysis showed increased levels of protein (42.42%), white blood cells (27.27%), and lymphocytes (24.24%). The negative results from the PCR analysis of the CSF for SARS-CoV-2 argue against direct invasion of the virus as an underlying mechanism of COVID-19 encephalopathy. There is a large variety of pharmacological agents administered due to the dynamic changes in COVID-19 guidelines and protocols at each center. Acyclovir and ceftriaxone were generally given as empirical therapy, and stopped when there was no evidence of a bacterial infection or HSV. There was an increase in proinflammatory cytokines in the CSF,1824273334 indicating a possible role of intravenous steroids and immunotherapy (IVIg and plasmapheresis) in the management of encephalopathy associated with COVID-19. Methylprednisolone and IVIg therapy given in the four cases of COVID-19-associated encephalopathy18262932 produced positive responses, with three patients discharged in a stable conditions182932 and the fourth still receiving care but with significant improvement.26 Dogan et al.34 reported that plasmapheresis therapy produced dramatic improvements in both clinical and laboratory findings. This positive result supported the theory of a cytokine-mediated hyperinflammatory response as the basis for the pathomechanism of COVID-19-associated encephalopathy.18

Cytokine-immune-mediated inflammation as the underlying pathomechanism in SARS-CoV-2-associated inflammation

While the mechanism of encephalopathy in COVID-19 remains unclear, previous studies have indicated the presence of neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 that allows it to invade the CNS. There are two pathways that allow this invasion: 1) through the systemic circulation and 2) through the cribriform plate of ethmoid bone.49 SARS-CoV-2 binds with the ACE2 receptor via spike protein S1, allowing the attachment of virions to cell membranes.4950 The systemic dissemination results from the attachment of SARS-CoV-2 to the ACE2 receptor in the capillary endothelium.50 ACE2 expression in glia cells and neurons is the pathway mechanism for cerebral damage.4950 The occurrence of hyposmia or anosmia due to the spread of the virus in the olfactory bulb via the cribriform plate is an alternative pathway for invading the CNS.49 The findings of the present study do not support the pathomechanism of CNS damage in COVID-19-associated encephalopathy involving direct invasion by the virus. EEG findings indicate diffuse cerebral abnormalities, possibly resulting from severe and extensive inflammation. CSF analyses have shown an inflammatory process (denoting elevated protein) mediated by cytokines, supported by the results of increased proinflammatory cytokines in the CSF. The predominantly negative CSF PCR (89%) against SARS-CoV-2 does not support the hypothesis that direct viral invasion of the brain is the cause of encephalopathy. However, it should be noted that the negative PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 in the CSF does not imply the absence of the virus, because PCR in the CSF has a rather low sensitivity.37 The possibility of an autoimmune mechanism was considered based on several previous studies linking COVID-19 with GBS.51 There were two reported cases with autoimmune features: 1) NMDA-R3352 and 2) limbic encephalitis, with T2-weighted hyperintense signal abnormalities in the limbic lobes, bilateral medial thalamus, and frontal white matter.32 The positive response exhibited by COVID-19 patients to intravenous steroid therapy and immunotherapy (IVIg and plasmapheresis) commonly used in autoimmune conditions such as myasthenia gravis and GBS suggest that an immune process plays a role in the occurrence of encephalitis.53 Fig. 2 illustrates the pathomechanism of immune-mediated cerebral damage in COVID-19-associated encephalopathy based on the theories from previous studies.545556 The binding of SARS-CoV-2 to ACE2 receptor via spike protein causes ACE2 downregulation,5054 followed by an increase in the ACE/angiotensin II/AT1R axis and a decrease in the MaSR (ACE2/Mas receptor) axis.54 These processes consequently result in the activation of the NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa B) and MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathways, upregulation of TGF-β (tumor growth factor beta), and downregulation of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10.5455 These excitations of proinflammatory pathways increase the levels of MCP-1 (monocyte chemotactic protein 1), VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1), selectin-E, and IL-6.55 IL-6 was found to be the core part of the cytokine storm.545556 IL-6 activates CD4 and T cells into Th17 (T helper 17) cells, which aggravate the proinflammatory cytokines IL-17, IL-21, and IL-22.57 The cytokine storm and the endothelial dysfunction causing damage to the blood–brain barrier make it easier for proinflammatory cytokines to enter the brain parenchyma and also cause further neural damage.56 The pathomechanism underlying COVID-19 encephalopathy has been suggested to be a cytokine-immune-inflammatory process,183456 but further research is needed to explain and confirm this hypothesis.
Fig. 2

Cytokine-immune-mediated inflammation and pathomechanism in COVID-19-associated encephalitis. ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein 1; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; TGF, tumor growth factor; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; Th17, T helper 17.

The main limitation in this study was the large variety of case reports and the findings of certain techniques such as EEG and PCR not being reported for all studies. Inflammatory markers and antineuronal autoantibodies were only assessed in a few studies, and so whether the cytokine-immune-mediated inflammatory process is the cause of COVID-19 encephalopathy remains inconclusive. In conclusion, The clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings in this review support the hypothesis that cerebral damage in COVID-19-associated encephalopathy is caused by cytokine-immune-mediated inflammation rather than by direct invasion. There have been several reports on the benefits of intravenous steroid therapy and immunotherapy in COVID-19-associated encephalopathy. Cytokine-immune-mediated inflammation may cause encephalopathy, but this remains inconclusive due to the inadequate data. Therefore, further examinations and research are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
  53 in total

1.  Olfactory neuropathy in severe acute respiratory syndrome: report of A case.

Authors:  Chi-Shin Hwang
Journal:  Acta Neurol Taiwan       Date:  2006-03

Review 2.  Neurobiology of COVID-19.

Authors:  Majid Fotuhi; Ali Mian; Somayeh Meysami; Cyrus A Raji
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Severe neurologic syndrome associated with Middle East respiratory syndrome corona virus (MERS-CoV).

Authors:  Y M Arabi; A Harthi; J Hussein; A Bouchama; S Johani; A H Hajeer; B T Saeed; A Wahbi; A Saedy; T AlDabbagh; R Okaili; M Sadat; H Balkhy
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in a psychiatric Covid-19 patient: A case report.

Authors:  Adelaide Panariello; Roberta Bassetti; Anna Radice; Roberto Rossotti; Massimo Puoti; Matteo Corradin; Mauro Moreno; Mauro Percudani
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-Coronavirus-2.

Authors:  Takeshi Moriguchi; Norikazu Harii; Junko Goto; Daiki Harada; Hisanori Sugawara; Junichi Takamino; Masateru Ueno; Hiroki Sakata; Kengo Kondo; Natsuhiko Myose; Atsuhito Nakao; Masayuki Takeda; Hirotaka Haro; Osamu Inoue; Katsue Suzuki-Inoue; Kayo Kubokawa; Shinji Ogihara; Tomoyuki Sasaki; Hiroyuki Kinouchi; Hiroyuki Kojin; Masami Ito; Hiroshi Onishi; Tatsuya Shimizu; Yu Sasaki; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Hiroshi Ishihara; Shiomi Furuya; Tomoko Yamamoto; Shinji Shimada
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Significant changes of peripheral T lymphocyte subsets in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Taisheng Li; Zhifeng Qiu; Linqi Zhang; Yang Han; Wei He; Zhengyin Liu; Xiaojun Ma; Hongwei Fan; Wei Lu; Jing Xie; Huanling Wang; Guohua Deng; Aixia Wang
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Evidence of the COVID-19 Virus Targeting the CNS: Tissue Distribution, Host-Virus Interaction, and Proposed Neurotropic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Abdul Mannan Baig; Areeba Khaleeq; Usman Ali; Hira Syeda
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 8.  SARS-CoV-2: an Emerging Coronavirus that Causes a Global Threat.

Authors:  Jun Zheng
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Meningoencephalitis without respiratory failure in a young female patient with COVID-19 infection in Downtown Los Angeles, early April 2020.

Authors:  Lisa Duong; Prissilla Xu; Antonio Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 7.217

Review 10.  Cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Peipei Song; Wei Li; Jianqin Xie; Yanlong Hou; Chongge You
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.314

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis after coronavirus disease 2019: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Hyesun Lee; Jong Hyun Jeon; Hojin Choi; Seong-Ho Koh; Kyu-Yong Lee; Young Joo Lee; Hyuk Sung Kwon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.