| Literature DB >> 35196447 |
Sarah Sussman1, Zachary Zimmerman2, Taylor Chishom3, Lauren Reid4, Mohammad Seyyedi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Otalgia can be primary/otogenic or secondary as a referred pain from another site, which can be difficult to establish owing to various causes and the complex innervation of the ear. In our center, we observed a large group of patients with unexplained otalgia that had a higher prevalence of migraine. We hypothesized that migraine may cause secondary otalgia. This study then aimed to determine the prevalence of migraine-associated otalgia and evaluate the efficacy of migraine treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This 2-year retrospective study was conducted at a busy otology clinic. Patients were identified using diagnostic codes corresponding to otalgia. The prevalence of migraine-associated otalgia was determined, and the efficacy of migraine treatment was evaluated in these patients. The interventions included prophylactic and abortive migraine treatments. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare between the pre- and post-treatment symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: Migraine; Migraine disorders; Otalgia; Secondary otalgia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35196447 PMCID: PMC8996084 DOI: 10.7874/jao.2021.00465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Audiol Otol
Fig. 1.Treatment algorithm for migrainious otalgia.
Patient demographics & characteristics
| All patients | All patients w/otalgia w/o headache | All migrainous otalgia | Migrainous otalgia w/treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 48.5±17.7 | 47.00±18.63 | 51.51±15.47 | 52.6±18.9 |
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 159 | 89 | 53 | 25 |
| Male | 49 | 34 | 11 | 5 |
| Total | 208 | 123 | 64 | 30 |
| Sex ratio (F:M) | 3.2:1 | 2.6:1 | 4.8:1 | 5:1 |
| Race | ||||
| White | 120 (57.7) | 78 (63.4) | 28 (43.7) | 20 (66.7) |
| Black | 70 (33.6) | 31 (25.2) | 34 (53.1) | 8 (26.6) |
| Other | 18 (8.7) | 14 (11.4) | 2 (3.1) | 2 (6.7) |
| Laterality | ||||
| Right | 86 (41.3) | 51 (41.5) | 32 (50.0) | 9 (30.0) |
| Left | 67 (32.3) | 39 (31.7) | 16 (25.0) | 9 (30.0) |
| Bilateral | 55 (26.4) | 33 (26.8) | 16 (25.0) | 12 (40.0) |
Data are presented as mean±standard deviation or n (%)
Reported otalgia symptoms in our patient population (n=30)
| Value | |
|---|---|
| Laterality | |
| Unilateral | 18 (60) |
| Bilateral | 12 (40) |
| Triggerability | 14 (47) |
| Positional change | 6 (20) |
| Sound or light | 5 (17) |
| Valsalva | 3 (10) |
| Pain characteristics | |
| Constant | 9 (30) |
| Aural fullness | 6 (20) |
| Sharp | 4 (13) |
| Throbbing | 3 (10) |
| Dull | 2 (7) |
| Other | 6 (20) |
| Associated symptoms | |
| Tinnitus | 12 (40) |
| Hearing loss | 10 (33) |
| Vertigo | 7 (23) |
Data are presented as n (%)
Fig. 2.Symptomatology of treatment study group.
Treatment efficacy based on patient questionnaire, broken into primary and secondary treatment medications
| Medication | Primary treatment | Secondary treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Improved (%) | n | Improved (%) | |
| Tricyclic antidepressant | 11 | 91 | 7 | 57 |
| Topiramate | 6 | 50 | 1 | 100 |
| Propranolol | 4 | 80 | 1 | 100 |
| Verapamil | 4 | 74 | 1 | 0 |
| Gabapentin | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Botox Injections[ | 2 | 100 | ||
onabotulinumtoxin A injections administered per PHASE III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) protocol