| Literature DB >> 35196446 |
Emel Ugur1,2, Bahriye Ozlem Konukseven3, Murat Topdag4, Mustafa Engin Cakmakci1,5, Deniz Ozlem Topdag4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study is to investigate the necessity of questioning virtual reality systems in the motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire (MSSQ)-short form. The secondary objective of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the MSSQ-short form, with proven validity and reliability. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In the questionnaire form, for which expert opinion was obtained to maintain linguistic equivalence, the virtual reality items were added to the questionnaire. The questionnaire was then administered to 297 individuals. The results were statistically analyzed with and without these virtual reality items for validity and reliability.Entities:
Keywords: Motion sickness; Proprioception; Questionnaire; Virtual reality
Year: 2022 PMID: 35196446 PMCID: PMC8996090 DOI: 10.7874/jao.2021.00577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Audiol Otol
Motion experience, sickness frequency, and item correlations with the whole MSSQ-added VR item
| Questionnaire Item | Traveled or experienced (%) | Any sickness: rarely or more (%) | Sickness frequency scale (mean) | Correlation with VR (r) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | Child | Adult | |
| Car | 99.3 | 100 | 45.8 | 30.2 | 0.93 | 0.49 | 0.336 | 0.504 |
| Bus | 99.0 | 100 | 57.6 | 43.4 | 1.27 | 0.82 | 0.292 | 0.421 |
| Train | 74.4 | 89.2 | 22.6 | 17.9 | 0.57 | 0.30 | 0.349 | 0.524 |
| Aircraft | 54.5 | 100 | 16.1 | 21.9 | 0.46 | 0.28 | 0.350 | 0.390 |
| Small boat/rowboat | 68.0 | 100 | 28.2 | 29.3 | 0.76 | 0.42 | 0.394 | 0.338 |
| Ship, ferry, etc. | 86.2 | 100 | 34.4 | 37.4 | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.406 | 0.502 |
| Swings | 98.3 | 100 | 32.0 | 28.6 | 0.60 | 0.45 | 0.323 | 0.416 |
| Ferris wheel | 91.2 | 100 | 52.5 | 43.7 | 1.11 | 0.79 | 0.462 | 0.470 |
| Roller coasters, wave swinger | 69.4 | 100 | 39.4 | 42.1 | 1.14 | 0.76 | 0.413 | 0.522 |
The p-value for correlation coefficients is p<0.001, which indicates the p-value for Spearman’s correlation analysis. MSSQ, motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire; VR, virtual reality
Exploratory factor analysis details of the MSSQ
| Item | Factor weights | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (entertainment) | 2 (maritime) | 3 (road) | 4 (aviation) | |
| Child | ||||
| Car | 0.803 | |||
| Bus | 0.859 | |||
| Train | 0.628 | |||
| Aircraft | 0.803 | |||
| Small boat/rowboat | 0.768 | |||
| Ship, ferry, etc. | 0.695 | |||
| Swings | 0.698 | |||
| Ferris wheel | 0.649 | |||
| Roller coasters, wave swinger | 0.633 | |||
| Simulation video games | 0.525 | |||
| Adult | ||||
| Car | 0.787 | |||
| Bus | 0.820 | |||
| Train | 0.579 | |||
| Aircraft | 0.791 | |||
| Small boat/rowboat | 0.775 | |||
| Ship, ferry, etc. | 0.700 | |||
| Swings | 0.567 | |||
| Ferris wheel | 0.835 | |||
| Roller coasters, wave swinger | 0.744 | |||
| Simulation video (virtual reality) games | 0.548 | |||
Exploratory total variance: 69.16%. Rotation method: equamax with Kaiser normalization. Extraction method: principal component analysis
Item total correlation coefficients
| Item | Total item correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Child | ||
| Car | 0.703 | <0.001 |
| Bus | 0.767 | <0.001 |
| Train | 0.649 | <0.001 |
| Aircraft | 0.574 | <0.001 |
| Small boat/rowboat | 0.684 | <0.001 |
| Ship, ferry, etc. | 0.725 | <0.001 |
| Swings | 0.616 | <0.001 |
| Ferris wheel | 0.761 | <0.001 |
| Roller coasters, wave swinger | 0.782 | <0.001 |
| Simulation video games | 0.521 | <0.001 |
| Adult | ||
| Car | 0.624 | <0.001 |
| Bus | 0.648 | <0.001 |
| Train | 0.565 | <0.001 |
| Aircraft | 0.588 | <0.001 |
| Small boat/rowboat | 0.574 | <0.001 |
| Ship, ferry, etc. | 0.723 | <0.001 |
| Swings | 0.633 | <0.001 |
| Ferris wheel | 0.704 | <0.001 |
| Roller coasters, wave swinger | 0.701 | <0.001 |
| Simulation video (virtual reality) games | 0.590 | <0.001 |
The p-value is the value for Spearman’s correlation analysis
Goodness of fit indices
| Fit indices | Fit indicator | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Chi-Square/SD | ≤4-5 | 2.65 |
| RMSEA | 0≤RMSEA≤0.08 | 0.075 |
| CFI | 0.90≤CFI≤1 | 0.95 |
| NNFI | 0.90≤NNFI≤1 | 0.95 |
| NFI | 0.90≤NFI≤1 | 0.92 |
SD, standard deviation; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; CFI, comparative fit index; NFI, normed fit index; NNFI, Non Normed Fit index
Fig. 1.The path diagram, measurement model and the results.