R Bonuti1, S Morato1. 1. Laboratório de Comportamento Exploratório, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Abstract
The elevated gradient of aversion (EGA) is an apparatus for investigating the exploratory behavior of rats in 3-min sessions, consisting of three different sections of the same size: tunnel, closed arm, and open arm. Factorial analyses have defined three factors: exploration, impulsivity, and self-protection. In general, male rats are placed in the tunnel end and tend to hesitate leaving this starting point. Then, they hesitate leaving the tunnel and entering the closed arm, which they explore and tend to avoid entering the open arm or even just stick their head in and not enter it at all. Since females were not used for this test and are reported to be more explorative than male rats, the present work aimed to compare the behavior of male and female rats in the EGA. Thirty male and 34 female Wistar rats were submitted to 3-min sessions in the EGA. In general, results indicated that females were different from males: they explored more (Factor 1 - Exploration), are more impulsive (Factor 2 - Impulsivity), and are less anxious/fearful (Factor 3 - Self-protection). These results confirmed the results of other studies obtained with other apparatuses and show that females exhibit higher locomotion than males and are less anxious/fearful.
The elevated gradient of aversion (EGA) is an apparatus for investigating the exploratory behavior of rats in 3-min sessions, consisting of three different sections of the same size: tunnel, closed arm, and open arm. Factorial analyses have defined three factors: exploration, impulsivity, and self-protection. In general, male rats are placed in the tunnel end and tend to hesitate leaving this starting point. Then, they hesitate leaving the tunnel and entering the closed arm, which they explore and tend to avoid entering the open arm or even just stick their head in and not enter it at all. Since females were not used for this test and are reported to be more explorative than male rats, the present work aimed to compare the behavior of male and female rats in the EGA. Thirty male and 34 female Wistar rats were submitted to 3-min sessions in the EGA. In general, results indicated that females were different from males: they explored more (Factor 1 - Exploration), are more impulsive (Factor 2 - Impulsivity), and are less anxious/fearful (Factor 3 - Self-protection). These results confirmed the results of other studies obtained with other apparatuses and show that females exhibit higher locomotion than males and are less anxious/fearful.
We have recently reported a new apparatus for scoring rat behavior in a novel
environment (1). A factorial analysis
indicated rat behavior is grouped into three factors: exploration, impulsivity, and
self-protection. The exploration factor included number of entries into the
divisions, time spent in the closed arm, and total number of entries in the whole
apparatus. The impulsivity factor included latency of the first entry into the open
arm, number of entries, and time spent in it. The self-protection factor included
measures related to the total time spent in the more protected area. It is not easy
to determine the motivations behind these factors, but from the measures discussed,
exploration may involve curiosity or information-seeking or simple motor activity.
Impulsivity may involve lack of control, while self-protection may involve anxiety
and/or fear. These factors were confirmed by comparison with the behavior of rats in
other apparatuses (open-field and elevated plus-maze) and with the use of drugs
affecting behavior (1).The above study (1) was conducted only with
males. However, it is well known that the behavior of males and females is rather
different when tested in the open-field (2-
9) or in the elevated plus-maze (10-
13). Thus, the aim of the present study was
to compare the behavior of males and females submitted to the elevated gradient of
aversion (EGA).
Material and Methods
Subjects
Thirty male (approximately 220 g) and 34 female (approximately 190 g) 60-day old
Wistar rats were obtained from the animal house of the State University of
Campinas, Brazil. They were housed in groups of five in polypropylene cages
(41×34×17 cm) with rat chow (Nuvilab, Brazil) and tap water ad
libitum. The animal room was maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle
(lights on at 7:00 a.m.) with temperature kept between 24 and 27°C. Cleaning of
the cages was performed three times a week and dust-free wood shavings were used
as bedding. All testing was performed between 7:30 and 11:30 a.m. All
experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the Guidelines of
the Brazilian Society for Neuroscience and Behavior recommendations for animal
care and with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986, and associated
guidelines.
Apparatus
The apparatus was composed of three compartments equal in size with different
motivational properties. It consisted of a 210×20-cm alley divided into three
70×20-cm distinct areas (Figure 1). The
first compartment (used as the starting point), at one end of the apparatus, was
tunnel-shaped, enclosed with walls 25-cm high, and covered with transparent red
Plexiglas (which allows observation and video recording), with the floor and
walls lined with black opaque Formica. At the entrance of the tunnel (rectangle
T1), there was a sliding door (20×25 cm) through which subjects were introduced
into the apparatus, which was the starting point. The other end of the tunnel
was connected to the second (middle) compartment, which was surrounded by walls
60-cm high. Both the floor and walls were lined with black opaque Formica and
resembled a closed arm of the elevated plus-maze. This second compartment was
connected to the third section, which had no walls and was lined with white
opaque Formica surrounded by a 1-cm high white rib to prevent rats from falling
off the apparatus. This section resembled the open arm of the elevated
plus-maze. The whole apparatus was elevated 50 cm above the ground.
Figure 1
Schematic representation (upper panel) of the elevated gradient of
aversion (EGA). Lower panel, top view of the EGA: dark gray indicates
the tunnel compartment with area division (T1 to T5), light gray
indicates the closed arm compartment (C1 to C5), and white indicates the
open arm compartment (O1 to O5).
Procedures
Each subject was individually placed at the beginning of the tunnel, then the
sliding door was closed and the animal was allowed to move freely for 3 min.
After each session, the apparatus was cleaned with a 5% ethanol solution and
dried with a cloth. The tests were carried out in a room lit by a 60-W
incandescent light bulb 2.7 m above the ground, which provided the following
light intensities measured at the center of each compartment: 2 lux inside the
tunnel, 20 lux inside the closed arm, and 35 lux in the open arm.All behavioral tests were recorded using a video camera (Sony, Brazil) placed
above the EGA and connected to a video recorder in an adjacent room. The videos
were subsequently analyzed by a trained observer. Behavioral parameters were
scored with a behavior scoring freeware (X-PloRat) developed at the Laboratory
of Exploratory Behavior, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
(14). To record the behavior of the
subjects, the EGA floor image was divided into fifteen 14×20-cm rectangles on a
transparent plastic sheet placed on the computer screen. The number of entries
and time spent in each rectangle were used to determine the measures included in
each factor. Entry into a rectangle was scored when all four paws of the rat had
entered the rectangle.
Data analysis
Data are reported as means±SE and comparisons between males and females were
analyzed by Student's t-test. In all cases, the level of
significance was set at P<0.05.
Results
Figure 2 shows the measures included in factor
1, exploration. Females and males did not differ in time spent in the closed arm
(F[1, 62]=2.458, P=0.122). In addition, female rats entered more rectangles in the
closed arm than male rats (F[1, 62]=37.961, P<0.001). Finally, female rats
entered more rectangles than males overall (F[1, 62]=47.043, P<0.001).
Figure 2
Measures included in the exploration factor. Closed (t): time spent in
the closed arm; Closed (f): number of squares entered in the closed arm;
Total (f): total number of entries in the elevated gradient of aversion; M:
males; F: females. Data are reported as means±SE. *P<0.05 compared to
males (unpaired Student's t-test).
Figure 3 shows factor 2 measures, impulsivity.
It shows that females exhibited a shorter latency than males to enter the open arm
for the first time (F[1, 62]=15.203, P<0.001). Also, the figure shows that
females spent more time in the open arm (F[1, 62]=13.086, P<0.001) and entered
more rectangles in the open arm than males (F[1, 62]=17.469, P<0.001).
Figure 3
Measures included in the impulsivity factor. Latency of first entry into
the open arm, time spent in the open arm, and number of squares entered in
the open arm are reported as means±SE. *P<0.05 compared to males
(unpaired Student's t-test). M: Males; F: females.
Figure 4 shows the measures included in factor
3, self-protection. Females spent less time than males in both the safe area -
rectangles 1 and 2 (F[1, 62]=4.678, P=0.034) and the transition area - rectangle 5
(F[1, 62]=9.013, P=0.004).
Figure 4
Measures included in the self-protection factor. Safe: time spent in the
safe area of the elevated gradient of aversion (EGA) (first and second
rectangles of the tunnel); transition: time spent in the transition area of
the EGA (fifth rectangle of the tunnel, next to the first rectangle of the
closed arm). M: Males; F: females. Data are reported as means±SE *P<0.05
compared to males (unpaired Student's t-test).
Discussion
In general, our results showed different behavior between females and males, with
females exploring more, as measured by the greater number of rectangles entered in a
similar time period. The difference in exploratory behavior (Factor 1) are easily
explained by the abundance of reports in the literature indicating that females
explore more than males in apparatuses such as the open-field, the elevated
plus-maze, and the light/dark box (2-13,15-17). In all of these reports,
this type of data is interpreted as decreased fear/anxiety.In general, females have been found to be more impulsive than males, as defined in
Rico et al. (1), that is, taking spontaneous
behaviors into account. Females entered the open arm earlier than males, explored it
more, and spent more time in it. Possible explanations for this difference are:
females have been reported to exhibit less anxiety/fear and higher locomotion (9-
12). Similar explanations could be used for
the lower scores on self-protection (Factor 3): females left the safe area and the
transition area earlier than males. In conclusion, females respond to the EGA, but
in a different way than males.