PURPOSE: Determine 1) if adults with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) exhibit exercise intolerance and 2) potential contributing mechanisms to exercise intolerance, specific to FSHD. METHODS: Eleven people with FSHD (47 ± 13 yr, 4 females) and 11 controls (46 ± 13 yr, 4 females) completed one visit, which included a volitional peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) cycling test. Breath-by-breath gas exchange, ventilation, and cardiovascular responses were measured at rest and during exercise. The test featured 3-min stages (speed, 65-70 rpm) with incremental increases in intensity (FSHD: 20 W per stage; control: 40-60 W per stage). Body lean mass (LM (kg, %)) was collected via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: V̇O2peak was 32% lower (24.5 ± 9.7 vs 36.2 ± 9.3 mL·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.01), and wattage was 55% lower in FSHD (112.7 ± 56.1 vs 252.7 ± 67.7 W, P < 0.01). When working at a relative submaximal intensity (40% of V̇O2peak), wattage was 55% lower in FSHD (41.8 ± 30.3 vs 92.7 ± 32.6 W, P = 0.01), although ratings of perceived exertion (FSHD: 11 ± 2 vs control: 10 ± 3, P = 0.61) and dyspnea (FSHD: 3 ± 1 vs control: 3 ± 2, P = 0.78) were similar between groups. At an absolute intensity (60 W), the rating of perceived exertion was 63% higher (13 ± 3 vs 8 ± 2, P < 0.01) and dyspnea was 180% higher in FSHD (4 ± 2 vs 2 ± 2, P < 0.01). V̇O2peak was most strongly correlated with resting O2 pulse in controls (P < 0.01, r = 0.90) and percent leg LM in FSHD (P < 0.01, r = 0.88). Among FSHD participants, V̇O2peak was associated with self-reported functionality (FSHD-HI score; activity limitation: P < 0.01, r = -0.78), indicating a strong association between perceived and objective impairments. CONCLUSIONS: Disease-driven losses of LM contribute to exercise intolerance in FSHD, as evidenced by a lower V̇O2peak and elevated symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue during submaximal exercise. Regular exercise participation may preserve LM, thus providing some protection against exercise tolerance in FSHD.
PURPOSE: Determine 1) if adults with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) exhibit exercise intolerance and 2) potential contributing mechanisms to exercise intolerance, specific to FSHD. METHODS: Eleven people with FSHD (47 ± 13 yr, 4 females) and 11 controls (46 ± 13 yr, 4 females) completed one visit, which included a volitional peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) cycling test. Breath-by-breath gas exchange, ventilation, and cardiovascular responses were measured at rest and during exercise. The test featured 3-min stages (speed, 65-70 rpm) with incremental increases in intensity (FSHD: 20 W per stage; control: 40-60 W per stage). Body lean mass (LM (kg, %)) was collected via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: V̇O2peak was 32% lower (24.5 ± 9.7 vs 36.2 ± 9.3 mL·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.01), and wattage was 55% lower in FSHD (112.7 ± 56.1 vs 252.7 ± 67.7 W, P < 0.01). When working at a relative submaximal intensity (40% of V̇O2peak), wattage was 55% lower in FSHD (41.8 ± 30.3 vs 92.7 ± 32.6 W, P = 0.01), although ratings of perceived exertion (FSHD: 11 ± 2 vs control: 10 ± 3, P = 0.61) and dyspnea (FSHD: 3 ± 1 vs control: 3 ± 2, P = 0.78) were similar between groups. At an absolute intensity (60 W), the rating of perceived exertion was 63% higher (13 ± 3 vs 8 ± 2, P < 0.01) and dyspnea was 180% higher in FSHD (4 ± 2 vs 2 ± 2, P < 0.01). V̇O2peak was most strongly correlated with resting O2 pulse in controls (P < 0.01, r = 0.90) and percent leg LM in FSHD (P < 0.01, r = 0.88). Among FSHD participants, V̇O2peak was associated with self-reported functionality (FSHD-HI score; activity limitation: P < 0.01, r = -0.78), indicating a strong association between perceived and objective impairments. CONCLUSIONS: Disease-driven losses of LM contribute to exercise intolerance in FSHD, as evidenced by a lower V̇O2peak and elevated symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue during submaximal exercise. Regular exercise participation may preserve LM, thus providing some protection against exercise tolerance in FSHD.
Authors: Jesse C Craig; Trenton D Colburn; Jacob T Caldwell; Daniel M Hirai; Ayaka Tabuchi; Dryden R Baumfalk; Bradley J Behnke; Carl J Ade; Timothy I Musch; David C Poole Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Chia-Yih Wang; William L Haskell; Stephen W Farrell; Michael J Lamonte; Steven N Blair; Lester R Curtin; Jeffery P Hughes; Vicki L Burt Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J Alberto Neder; Abdullah Alharbi; Danilo C Berton; Maria Clara N Alencar; Flavio F Arbex; Daniel M Hirai; Katherine A Webb; Denis E O'Donnell Journal: COPD Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Johanna Hamel; Nicholas Johnson; Rabi Tawil; William B Martens; Nuran Dilek; Michael P McDermott; Chad Heatwole Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Joshua R Smith; Michael J Joyner; Timothy B Curry; Barry A Borlaug; Manda L Keller-Ross; Erik H Van Iterson; Thomas P Olson Journal: J Physiol Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 6.228
Authors: Miguel Anselmo; Shandon Coffman; Mia Larson; Kathryn Vera; Emma Lee; Mary McConville; Michael Kyba; Manda L Keller-Ross Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2022-04