Literature DB >> 35195091

Development and implementation of an automated electronic health record-linked registry for emergency general surgery.

Zongyang Mou1, Amy M Sitapati, Mokhshan Ramachandran, Jay J Doucet, Amy E Liepert.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite adoption of the emergency general surgery (EGS) service by hospitals nationally, quality improvement (QI) and research for this patient population are challenging because of the lack of population-specific registries. Past efforts have been limited by difficulties in identifying EGS patients within institutions and labor-intensive approaches to data capture. Thus, we created an automated electronic health record (EHR)-linked registry for EGS.
METHODS: We built a registry within the Epic EHR at University of California San Diego for the EGS service. Existing EHR labels that identified patients seen by the EGS team were used to create our automated inclusion rules. Registry validation was performed using a retrospective cohort of EGS patients in a 30-month period and a 1-month prospective cohort. We created quality metrics that are updated and reported back to clinical teams in real time and obtained aggregate data to identify QI and research opportunities. A key metric tracked is clinic schedule rate, as we care that discontinuity postdischarge for the EGS population remains a challenge.
RESULTS: Our registry captured 1,992 patient encounters with 1,717 unique patients in the 30-month period. It had a false-positive EGS detection rate of 1.8%. In our 1-month prospective cohort, it had a false-positive EGS detection rate of 0% and sensitivity of 85%. For quality metrics analysis, we found that EGS patients who were seen as consults had significantly lower clinic schedule rates on discharge compared with those who were admitted to the EGS service (85% vs. 60.7%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: An EHR-linked EGS registry can reliably conduct capture data automatically and support QI and research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35195091      PMCID: PMC9329176          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.697


  17 in total

1.  Acute care surgery: a new strategy for the general surgery patients left behind.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; S Morad Hameed; Frederick D Brenneman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Standardized electronic health record data modeling and persistence: A comparative review.

Authors:  Aya Gamal; Sherif Barakat; Amira Rezk
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  The Future of Emergency General Surgery.

Authors:  Joaquim M Havens; Pooja U Neiman; Braidie L Campbell; Martin A Croce; David A Spain; Lena M Napolitano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The Silent Majority of Emergency General Surgery: An Assessment of Consult and Operative Volumes.

Authors:  Lauren E Matevish; Andrew J Medvecz; Joseph M Ebersole; Jonathan P Wanderer; Shannon C Eastham; Bradley M Dennis; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Identification of postoperative complications using electronic health record data and machine learning.

Authors:  Michael Bronsert; Abhinav B Singh; William G Henderson; Karl Hammermeister; Robert A Meguid; Kathryn L Colborn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Creation and implementation of an emergency general surgery registry modeled after the National Trauma Data Bank.

Authors:  Robert D Becher; J Wayne Meredith; Michael C Chang; J Jason Hoth; H Randall Beard; Preston R Miller
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Lisa Bastarache; Marylyn D Ritchie; Robert J Carroll; Raquel Zink; Jonathan D Mosley; Julie R Field; Jill M Pulley; Andrea H Ramirez; Erica Bowton; Melissa A Basford; David S Carrell; Peggy L Peissig; Abel N Kho; Jennifer A Pacheco; Luke V Rasmussen; David R Crosslin; Paul K Crane; Jyotishman Pathak; Suzette J Bielinski; Sarah A Pendergrass; Hua Xu; Lucia A Hindorff; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Christopher G Chute; Rex L Chisholm; Eric B Larson; Gail P Jarvik; Murray H Brilliant; Catherine A McCarty; Iftikhar J Kullo; Jonathan L Haines; Dana C Crawford; Daniel R Masys; Dan M Roden
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Grid Binary LOgistic REgression (GLORE): building shared models without sharing data.

Authors:  Yuan Wu; Xiaoqian Jiang; Jihoon Kim; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Development of an electronic health record-based chronic kidney disease registry to promote population health management.

Authors:  Mallika L Mendu; Salman Ahmed; Jason K Maron; Sandhya K Rao; Sreekanth K Chaguturu; Megan F May; Walter P Mutter; Kelly A Burdge; David J R Steele; David B Mount; Sushrut S Waikar; Jeffrey B Weilburg; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Privacy-protecting, reliable response data discovery using COVID-19 patient observations.

Authors:  Jihoon Kim; Larissa Neumann; Paulina Paul; Michele E Day; Michael Aratow; Douglas S Bell; Jason N Doctor; Ludwig C Hinske; Xiaoqian Jiang; Katherine K Kim; Michael E Matheny; Daniella Meeker; Mark J Pletcher; Lisa M Schilling; Spencer SooHoo; Hua Xu; Kai Zheng; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 7.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.