Wenyu Hu1, Jia Yu1, Nan Yao1, Xiaotong Li1, Yixue Yang1, Ling Wang1, Mengzi Sun1, Yinpei Guo1, Han Wang1, Shoumeng Yan1, Bo Li2. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, People's Republic of China. li_bo@jlu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRC), ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRL), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and multiband mucosectomy (MBM) are used for treating early esophageal cancer patients. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of four different endoscopic treatments. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched to include relevant studies published from database inception until February 15, 2021. There were no date or language restrictions. Data related to study such as characteristics, methods, outcomes, and risks of bias were extracted by two reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 11 articles with 1880 patients were included. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that ESD was a better choice considering the efficacy of en bloc resection rate (surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) = ESD: 99.5%, EMRC: 26.5%, MBM: 24.1%) and local recurrence rate (SUCRA = EMRC: 95.6%, MBM: 42.9%, ESD: 11.6%). MBM had a lower rate of side effects compared to the other treatments: perforation rate (SUCRA = ESD: 100%, EMRC: 48.1%, MBM: 1.9%), stricture rate (SUCRA = ESD: 99.8%, MBM: 40.8%, EMRC: 9.4%), and bleeding rate (SUCRA = EMRC: 69.4%, ESD: 62.2%, EMRL: 61.6%, MBM: 6.8%). MBM also had the shortest operation time and smallest diameter of the specimens. CONCLUSION: The MBM endoscopic treatment was recommended for early esophageal cancer patients, but considering the increase in lesion size, ESD would be better.
PURPOSE: Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRC), ligation-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRL), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and multiband mucosectomy (MBM) are used for treating early esophageal cancer patients. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of four different endoscopic treatments. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science) were systematically searched to include relevant studies published from database inception until February 15, 2021. There were no date or language restrictions. Data related to study such as characteristics, methods, outcomes, and risks of bias were extracted by two reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 11 articles with 1880 patients were included. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that ESD was a better choice considering the efficacy of en bloc resection rate (surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) = ESD: 99.5%, EMRC: 26.5%, MBM: 24.1%) and local recurrence rate (SUCRA = EMRC: 95.6%, MBM: 42.9%, ESD: 11.6%). MBM had a lower rate of side effects compared to the other treatments: perforation rate (SUCRA = ESD: 100%, EMRC: 48.1%, MBM: 1.9%), stricture rate (SUCRA = ESD: 99.8%, MBM: 40.8%, EMRC: 9.4%), and bleeding rate (SUCRA = EMRC: 69.4%, ESD: 62.2%, EMRL: 61.6%, MBM: 6.8%). MBM also had the shortest operation time and smallest diameter of the specimens. CONCLUSION: The MBM endoscopic treatment was recommended for early esophageal cancer patients, but considering the increase in lesion size, ESD would be better.
Authors: Henry Badgery; Matthew Read; Nicole N Winter; Andrew C F Taylor; Michael W Hii Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Roos E Pouw; Frederike G I van Vilsteren; Femke P Peters; Lorenza Alvarez Herrero; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Mike Visser; Boudewijn E Schenk; Erik J Schoon; Frans T M Peters; Martin Houben; Raf Bisschops; Bas L A M Weusten; Jacques J G H M Bergman Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Yue-Ming Zhang; David F Boerwinkel; Xiumin Qin; Shun He; Liyan Xue; Bas L A M Weusten; Sanford M Dawsey; David E Fleischer; Li-Zhou Dou; Yong Liu; Ning Lu; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Gui-Qi Wang Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 10.093