Literature DB >> 35194688

Macrophyte communities as indicators of the ecological status of drainage canals and regulated rivers (Eastern Poland).

Monika Tarkowska-Kukuryk1, Antoni Grzywna2.   

Abstract

Macrophytes are one of the biological elements for assessing the ecological status. Macrophyte communities were studied in six artificial (drainage canal and ditches) or modified watercourses (regulated rivers). In order to assess the ecological status of the watercourses, studies were carried out with the use of the Macrophyte Index for Rivers (MIR) proposed in the Water Framework Directive. Macrophyte communities were mainly represented by helophytes (12 species in total), and the highest percentage area cover (50-75% of the site) was observed for pleustophytes (Lemna spp.). Macrophytes communities were affected by the gradients of hydromorphological (canal modification, flow type, and shading) and parameters water quality (nutrients and water transparency). The relationships were highly species-specific. In accordance with the MIR values, the ecosystems were classified as having poor (drainage canal), moderate (regulated rivers), or good (drainage ditches) ecological status.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial watercourses; Chemical parameters; Hydromorphological Index for River; Macrophyte Index for River

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35194688      PMCID: PMC8863726          DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-09777-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   3.307


  13 in total

1.  Distribution of aquatic macrophytes in contrasting river systems: a critique of compositional-based assessment of water quality.

Authors:  Benoît O L Demars; Anthony C Edwards
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  The value of novel ecosystems: Disclosing the ecological quality of quarry lakes.

Authors:  Laura M S Seelen; Sven Teurlincx; John Bruinsma; Thea M F Huijsmans; Ellen van Donk; Miquel Lürling; Lisette N de Senerpont Domis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  The effect of river damming on vegetation: is it always unfavourable? A case study from the River Tiber (Italy).

Authors:  Simona Ceschin; Ilaria Tombolini; Silverio Abati; Vincenzo Zuccarello
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Effects of the manipulation of submerged macrophytes, large zooplankton, and nutrients on a cyanobacterial bloom: A mesocosm study in a tropical shallow reservoir.

Authors:  Cihelio A Amorim; Ariadne N Moura
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 5.  The effects of hydropeaking on riverine plants: a review.

Authors:  María D Bejarano; Roland Jansson; Christer Nilsson
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2017-08-17

6.  Integrating river hydromorphology and water quality into ecological status modelling by artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Daniel Gebler; Gerhard Wiegleb; Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Long-Term Responses of River-Margin Vegetation to Water-Level Regulation

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The assessment of the amount of water pollution and its suitability for drinking of the Tyśmienica River Basin, Poland.

Authors:  Antoni Grzywna; Joanna Sender
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 9.  Small Water Bodies in Great Britain and Ireland: Ecosystem function, human-generated degradation, and options for restorative action.

Authors:  William D Riley; Edward C E Potter; Jeremy Biggs; Adrian L Collins; Helen P Jarvie; J Iwan Jones; Mary Kelly-Quinn; Steve J Ormerod; David A Sear; Robert L Wilby; Samantha Broadmeadow; Colin D Brown; Paul Chanin; Gordon H Copp; Ian G Cowx; Adam Grogan; Duncan D Hornby; Duncan Huggett; Martyn G Kelly; Marc Naura; Jonathan R Newman; Gavin M Siriwardena
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.