| Literature DB >> 35194114 |
Xuhu Wang1,2,3, Wang Li1,2,3, Li Jin4,5,6, Meimei Gong2,3,7, Junqiang Wang1,2,3, Yujie Zhong1,2,3, Yi Ruan1,2,3, Chunhong Guo1,2,3, Chenguang Xin1,2,3, Mengwei Li8,9,10.
Abstract
A high-precision micro-displacement sensor based on tunnel magneto-resistance effect is reported.We designed and simulated magnetic characteristics of the sensor, and employed chip-level Au-In bonding to implement low-temperature assembly of the TMR devices. We employed the subdivision interpolation technique to enhance the resolution by translating the sine-cosine outputs of a TMR sensor into an output that varies linearly with the displacement. Simultaneously, using the multi-bridge circuit method to suppress external magnetic and geomagnetic interference. Experimental result shows that the micro-displacement sensor has a resolution of 800 nm, accuracy of 0.14[Formula: see text] and a full-scale range of up to millimeter level. This work enables a high-performance displacement sensor, and provides a significant guide for the design of a micro-displacement sensor in practical applications.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35194114 PMCID: PMC8863979 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06965-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the TMR-based displacement sensor (Created by Microsoft Visio 2013 (15.0) and SOLIDWORKS(R) Premium 2016.).
Figure 2Magnetic field distribution analysis. H is the distance between electronic coil layer and TMR devices layer, ranging from 200 to with a step of . (a) Model of the electronic coil (Created by Microsoft Visio 2013 (15.0) and SOLIDWORKS(R) Premium 2016.). (b) The magnetic field distribution along the sense direction. (c) The magnetic field along the sense direction (Y-axis) versus different layer distance H. (d) The magnetic field along the X-axis versus different layer height H.
Figure 3Fabrication processing flow of the bonding structure. (a) Sample wafer. (b) SiO passivation layer was deposited on the surface by PECVD. (c) Sputtering of the electrode and bonding pads. (d) In layer evaporated onto the bonding pads. (e) Photoresist coated. (f) Scribing. (g) Reducing the thickness. (h) TMR device. (i) Photoresist removed. (j) Wafer-level Au-In bonding. (Created by Microsoft Visio 2013 (15.0) and SOLIDWORKS(R) Premium 2016.).
Figure 4(a) Photograph of the fabricated 4-inch silicon wafer. (b) Micrograph of the bonding pads (Created by Microsoft Visio 2013 (15.0)). (c) Image of wafer-level Au-In bonding with TMR.
Figure 5Shear test results. (a) Illustration of shear test configuration. (b) The shear strength as function of bonding temperature with different In thickness D.
Figure 6SEM/EDS image of fracture surface of bonded sample. Three different fracture positions were observed in (a–c), compared with the other fracture surface shown in (d), the fracture occurs at adhesive layer.
Figure 7Experimental tests of the TMR devices. (a) Experimental setup. (b) The magnetic-resistance sensitivity of the TMR devices.
Figure 8Principle of subdivision interpolation circuit. (a) A couple of sinusoids with phase difference of (Created by Microsoft Visio 2013 (15.0) and SOLIDWORKS(R) Premium 2016.). (b–d) Process of the interpolation circuits converting the two sinusoidal signals into an industry standard incremental quadrature digital signal.
Figure 9(a) Two sinusoidal signals with quadrature phase shift. (b) Standard incremental AB quadrature digital signal. (c) Comparison of the linear encoder positioning system and displacement output of the interpolation circuit. (d) Error distribution curve.