| Literature DB >> 35194079 |
Tao Zhang1, Jianyong Shi2,3, Xun Wu2,3, Shi Shu2,3, Hai Lin4.
Abstract
Due to rapid degradation of the newly filled municipal solid waste (MSW), the local temperature of the waste layer increases greatly. The mechanical parameters related to waste degradation and the deformation of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes in the waste body will be affected by the elevated temperature. To predict the temperature distribution in the anaerobic landfill, a one-dimensional heat transfer model is established in this study. This model considers the stratification of the saturated and unsaturated zones, and the layering of new and old waste. Furthermore, a single peak model for heat production is applied as the source term of heat production. The stratification of the unsaturated and saturated zones is considered by distinguishing the difference in heat conductivity and specific heat capacity. The layering of the new and old waste layers is considered by distinguishing the difference in the length of time that waste has been degraded to produce heat. Based on the numerical calculation method, the temperature distribution in a landfill with layered new and old MSW is well simulated. The position where the maximum temperature occurs and the variation in the temperature at the edge of new and old waste are elucidated. The sensitivity analysis shows that the influence of the density on the temperature distribution is more significant. Besides, the stratification of saturated-unsaturated waste should also be considered in landfills.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35194079 PMCID: PMC8863833 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06722-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Physical model for heat transfer in the Wuxi landfill.
Parameters of heat transfer model in the Wuxi landfill.
| Parameter | Value | Value from reference | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
(W (m K)-1) | 0.035—0.242 | [ | |
(J (kg K)-1) | – | [ | |
(kg m-3) | 700.0 | – | [ |
(d) | – | – | |
| 0.15, 0.55 and 0.30 | 0.15, 0.55 and 0.30 | [ | |
(W m-3) | 15.0, 5.0 and 0.6d | – | [ |
(d) | 30, 50 and 350d | – | [ |
aThe heat conductivity of waste in the saturated zone was larger than that in the unsaturated zone[19,33], and then the heat conductivities of waste in the saturated zone and the unsaturated zone were reasonably selected within the range of the literature value;
bBased on the equation of the specific heat capacity of waste provided by Garg and Achari[35], as shown in Eq. (7), the specific heat capacities for the unsaturated and saturated zones can be calculated according to the waste composition of Wuxi landfill provided by Zhang et al.[24], and the specific heat capacity of each component provided by Yoshida et al.[53] and Miller and Clesceri[54].
where, C is the specific heat capacity of waste (J (kg K)-1); C, C and C are the specific heat capacities of each component, leachate, and landfill gas, respectively (J (kg K)-1); ρ, ρ, ρ and ρ are the densities of waste, each component, leachate, and landfill gas, respectively (kg m-3); n is the porosity of the waste; S is the liquid phase saturation.
cIn order to simulate the temperature at the bottom of monitoring well, which was placed after the waste body was excavated, the length of time that the waste in the new waste layer had been degraded to produce the temperature was set to 0; 40 was the average length of time for the existence of the new waste layer (d); 8.5 was the thickness of the new waste layer (m); 1.5 was the average height for placing the waste in the old waste layer each year (m);
dA/e was the peak value of heat production rate in this model, so A in Fig. 3 was equal to the peak heat rate in the literature multiplied by e (natural constant). and were based on the data provided by Hanson et al.[9,55] and the actual situation of the Wuxi landfill, A and B were obtained using the method of empirical fitting, as shown in Fig. 3.
Figure 2Comparison of the calculation and test values of temperature with time at the bottom of the different wells: (a) Surface (Depth: 0 m); (b) #4 well (Depth: 5.88 m); (c) #5 well (Depth: 3.58 m); (d) #6 well (Depth: 6.56 m); (e) #7 well (Depth: 1.34 m); (f) #8 well (Depth: 2.05 m).
Figure 3Method of empirical fitting for A and B.
Figure 4Comparison of the calculation and test values of the temperature with the height at the different times: (a) Day 50; (b) Day 150; (c) Day 300; (d) Day 517.
Figure 5Comparison of the temperature distribution on Day 365 under the conditions of the different sensitive parameters: (a) stratification of the saturated–unsaturated waste; (b) heat conductivity of the waste (λ); (c) specific heat capacity of the waste (C); (d) density of the waste (ρ).