| Literature DB >> 35192703 |
Lillian Reuman1,2, Chelsey Solar1, R Ross MacLean3,4, Allison M Halat2, Haseena Rajeevan4, David A Williams5, Alicia A Heapy3,4, Matthew J Bair6,7,8, Sarah L Krein5,9, Robert D Kerns3,4, Diana M Higgins1,2.
Abstract
Little is known about how individuals with chronic pain use tailored internet-based interventions. This study is the first to compare self-reported skill module use to observed module access and to examine each of these in relationship to tailored recommendations to access specific content. Participants (N = 58) enrolled in a 10-week trial of the Pain EASE program, a tailored internet-based intervention that includes 10 pain self-management skill modules. Participants completed a "Self-Assessment," which was used to provide a "Personalized Plan" that encouraged accessing specific modules. Participants self-reported module use during weekly data collection telephone calls. Program log data were extracted to capture "observed" module use during the trial period. Findings indicated significantly greater self-reported use of the Pain EASE modules compared to observed access with log data. Further, log data revealed that participants accessed less than half of the modules recommended to them via tailoring. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Behavioral Medicine 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive behavioral therapy; Pain; Self-management; Tailoring
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35192703 PMCID: PMC9154266 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Behav Med ISSN: 1613-9860 Impact factor: 3.626