Literature DB >> 35191995

[Quality-oriented facility selection in the rehabilitation of the German pension insurance].

Susanne Weinbrenner1, Eve Luise Kayser2, Nina-Tamara Moser2, Thorsten Siebert2.   

Abstract

According to Sixth Book of the Social Code (SGB VI), the German Pension Insurance (GPI) has the mandate to maintain or restore the employability of its insured persons. In order to achieve this goal, the GPI offers its insurees rehabilitation benefits. These are, on the one hand, services for prevention and medical rehabilitation (rehab) and, on the other hand, services for return-to-work or stay-at-work, respectively. In order to fulfill this mandate in the best possible way, in 1990 the GPI introduced instruments of external quality assurance (EQS) with scientific support. The system was firmly established in 1997. Since then, all rehab facilities owned and managed by the GPI are obliged to participate in the EQS system.Over the years, a large number of instruments and procedures have been developed that can map various aspects of quality as structure, process, and outcome. Until 2017, results of the EQS had no influence on the cooperation between the GPI and service providers. With the binding decision of the Federal Executive Board of the GPI in 2017, for the first time the GPI linked the allocation of rehab services for specific patients with the results of EQS. On this basis - confirmed by article 3 of the Digital Pension Overview Act - new paths are being taken. As part of the technically supported selection of a suitable facility for insured persons, quality should systematically and transparently acquire special importance and be consistently taken into account when occupying rehab facilities.This article gives an overview of the development of the proved and tested instruments of rehab quality assurance (QA), their current application, and an outlook on the rehab QA of the future.
© 2022. Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External quality assurance; Law on digital pension overview; Procurement of rehabilitation services; Rehabilitation; Selection of facilities

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35191995     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-022-03501-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  5 in total

Review 1.  Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?

Authors:  Laura A Petersen; LeChauncy D Woodard; Tracy Urech; Christina Daw; Supicha Sookanan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  The Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB).

Authors:  Alan M Jette; Pengsheng Ni; Elizabeth Rasch; Elizabeth Marfeo; Christine McDonough; Diane Brandt; Lewis Kazis; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.784

3.  Standardized reporting of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics.

Authors:  Birgit Prodinger; Alan Tennant; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  An initial psychometric evaluation of the German PROMIS v1.2 Physical Function item bank in patients with a wide range of health conditions.

Authors:  Gregor Liegl; Matthias Rose; Helena Correia; H Felix Fischer; Sibel Kanlidere; Annett Mierke; Alexander Obbarius; Sandra Nolte
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2017-06-11       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Calibration of an item bank in 474 orthopedic patients using Rasch analysis for computer-adaptive assessment of anxiety.

Authors:  Selina Kallinger; Henry Scharm; Maren Boecker; Thomas Forkmann; Harald Baumeister
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.477

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.