Literature DB >> 35190904

Sexual differences in responses of meadow voles to environmental cues in the presence of mink odor.

David M Midlick1, Sarah S Garris2, Karl N Rohrer1, Michael H Ferkin1.   

Abstract

In rodents, defensive behaviors increase the chances of survival during a predator encounter. Observable rodent defensive behaviors have been shown to be influenced by the presence of predator odors and nearby environmental cues such as cover, odors from conspecifics and food availability. Our experiment tested whether a predator scent cue influenced refuge preference in meadow voles within a laboratory setting. We placed voles in an experimental apparatus with bedding soaked in mink scent versus olive oil as a control across from four tubes that either contained (a) a dark plastic covering, (b) opposite-sex conspecific odor, (c) a food pellet, or (d) an empty, unscented space. A three-way interaction of tube contents, subject sex, and the presence of mink or olive oil on the preference of meadow voles to spend time in each area of the experimental apparatus and their latency to enter each area of the apparatus revealed sex differences in the environmental preference of meadow voles facing the risk of predation. The environmental preference of female, but not male, meadow voles was altered by the presence of mink urine or olive oil. A similar trend was found in the latency of males and females to enter each area of the experimental apparatus. These differences suggest that each sex utilizes different methods to increase their fitness when experiencing a predation risk. The observed sex differences may be explained by the natural history of voles owing to the differences in territorial range and the dynamics of evasion of terrestrial predators.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental cues; Evasion; Microtus pennsylvanicus; Mink; Predation; Predator scent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35190904     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01606-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   2.899


  9 in total

Review 1.  The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies.

Authors:  Raimund Apfelbach; Caroline D Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard; R Andrew Hayes; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Neuroendocrine changes upon exposure to predator odors.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Hegab; Wanhong Wei
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-05

3.  Influence of a natural stressor (predator odor) on locomotor activity in the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus): modulation by sex, reproductive condition and gonadal hormones.

Authors:  T Perrot-Sinal; K P Ossenkopp; M Kavaliers
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven L Lima; Peter A Bednekoff
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Cover and efficacy of predator-based repellents for Townsend's voleMicrotus townsendii.

Authors:  M Merkens; A S Harestad; T P Sullivan
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Sexually dimorphic aspects of spontaneous activity in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): effects of exposure to fox odor.

Authors:  T S Perrot-Sinal; V R Heale; K P Ossenkopp; M Kavaliers
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 7.  The mouse light/dark box test.

Authors:  Michel Bourin; Martine Hascoët
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Light/dark transition test for mice.

Authors:  Keizo Takao; Tsuyoshi Miyakawa
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Protean behavior under barn-owl attack: voles alternate between freezing and fleeing and spiny mice flee in alternating patterns.

Authors:  Shahaf Edut; David Eilam
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.