Literature DB >> 35190884

An alkasite restorative material effectively remineralized artificial interproximal enamel caries in vitro.

Thipthida Theerarath1, Wannakorn Sriarj2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the remineralization of artificial interproximal enamel caries (AIEC) adjacent to alkasite, high viscous glass ionomer cement (HVGIC), and resin composite in class II restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human enamel specimens were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 22): Filtek™ Z350, EQUIA Forte®, and Cention N®. The baseline hardness was determined using a Knoop microhardness assay. AIEC was formed in the specimens, and they were placed in contact with the proximal restorative materials then subjected to a 7-day pH cycling. Microhardness was determined post-artificial caries formation and post-pH cycling. The differences in the percentage of surface hardness recovery (%SHR) between the groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The Dunn's test was used for between-group comparisons (p < 0.05). Specimen surface morphology was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the calcium, phosphorus, and fluoride contents were analyzed by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). ANOVA with the post hoc Tukey multiple comparison test was used to evaluate the differences between groups (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: The Cention N® %SHR was the highest, followed by EQUIA Forte®, and Filtek™ Z350. There was a significant difference in the %SHR between Cention N® and Filtek™ Z350 (p < 0.05). In contrast, there were no significant difference between Cention N® and EQUIA Forte®. Significantly increased enamel surface fluoride content was observed in the Cention N® compared with Filtek™ Z350 specimens (p < 0.05). The SEM image of the Cention N® specimens demonstrated the greatest mineral deposition.
CONCLUSIONS: Cention N® markedly increased the surface hardness and fluoride content of adjacent AIEC compared with Filtek™ Z350 restorations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cention N® is a promising alternative restorative material to remineralize initial enamel lesions in approximal adjacent surfaces, especially in high-risk caries patients.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alkasite; Dentistry; Interproximal enamel caries; Remineralization; Surface microhardness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35190884     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04407-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  7 in total

1.  Dentin and enamel demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Z 100 and Cention N.

Authors:  Kevin J Donly; Jungyi Alexis Liu
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Evaluation of human enamel surfaces treated with theobromine: a pilot study.

Authors:  Betul Kargul; Mutlu Özcan; Sertac Peker; Tetsuo Nakamoto; William B Simmons; Alexander U Falster
Journal:  Oral Health Prev Dent       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.256

3.  Fluorides leaching from restorative materials and the effect on adjacent teeth.

Authors:  Vibeke Qvist; Agneta Poulsen; Poul Thorpen Teglers; Ivar A Mjör
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro: III. A study of the deposition mechanism.

Authors:  J M ten Cate; J Arends
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  The effect of atraumatic restorative treatment on adhesive restorations for dental caries in deciduous molars.

Authors:  Eliane Batista de Medeiros Serpa; Marayza Alves Clementino; Ana Flávia Granville-Garcia; Aronita Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  Long-term evaluation of the remineralization of interproximal caries-like lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer restorations: a micro-CT study.

Authors:  Hyeok-Sang Lee; Joel H Berg; Franklin García-Godoy; Ki-Taeg Jang
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.522

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effect of adhesive coating on calcium, phosphate, and fluoride release from experimental and commercial remineralizing dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Matej Par; Andrea Gubler; Thomas Attin; Zrinka Tarle; Andro Tarle; Katica Prskalo; Tobias T Tauböck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Mechanical Behavior of Alkasite Posterior Restorations in Comparison to Polymeric Materials: A 3D-FEA Study.

Authors:  Pietro Ausiello; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alessandro Espedito di Lauro; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Luca Testarelli; João Paulo Mendes Tribst
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.