| Literature DB >> 35190740 |
Defu Liu1,2, Zhengjun Wang1,2, Li Zhong3, Caoyu Xie1,2, Xiaonan Huang1,2, Yaofeng Zhi1,2,4, Yuzhuo Zhang1,2,4, Jiaying Liang1,2,4, Zhenni Shi1,2, Jin Huang1,2, Shuhe Zhang1,2, Jin Zhang1,2, Fuping Ding5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the target and potential mechanism of Scutellaria baicalensis (SB) in the treatment of HCC based on bioinformatics, so as to provide suggestions for the diagnosis, treatment, and drug development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35190740 PMCID: PMC8858046 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8762717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol ISSN: 1687-8450 Impact factor: 4.375
Figure 1(a) Cluster diagram of expression pattern, a total of 10 clusters, abscissa for different time, ordinate for gene expression. (b) Heatmap of the top 100 differentially expressed genes in drug process data in the normal group and HCC group. (c) Volcano map of difference analysis in drug process data; red represents upregulated genes, blue represents downregulated genes, and grey represents no significant difference genes. (d) Venn diagram of intersection between differential genes and gene expression patterns clusters 6 and 7.
Figure 2(a) The horizontal axis of the two graphs is soft threshold, the vertical axis of the left graph is the square of the correlation coefficient in the network, and the vertical axis of the right graph represents the mean value of all gene adjacency function in the module. (b) Gene clustering tree constructed by the one-step method and modules obtained before and after cutting. (c) Heatmap of sample clustering. (d) Heatmap of module vector gene TOM matrix. (e) Heatmap of correlation between modules and phenotypes.
Figure 3(a) GO enrichment map; dot size in left and column length in right represents the number of enriched genes; red and blue represent high and low significance. (b) The left graph is the clustering tree of KEGG-enriched genes and pathways, and the right graph is the circle map of four pathways in KEGG enrichment. (c) GSEA enrichment analysis results of four pathways.
Figure 4(a) Forest map of univariate cox proportional hazard analysis. (b) The variation of mean square error (MSE) with parameter lnλ. (c) Coefficients changes with parameters of genes involved in the prognostic model of Lasso regression, 0 means deletion. (d) Risk curve, survival, and gene expression of different risk patients in the train group. (e) Risk curve, survival, and gene expression of different risk patients in the test group. (f) ROC map and survival curve of the train group. (g) ROC map and survival curve of the test group.
Figure 5(a) PPI network in genes of MEbrown module. (b) Active components of SB-HCC mutual target network diagram, the line represents the existence of interaction, red represents the CGRSBs, and yellow represents the higher score node in the CGRSBs. (c) Results for molecular docking.
Figure 6Survival curve and differential box diagram of each gene in CGRSBs.
Figure 7(a) Infiltration of different immune cells in the HCC group and normal group. (b) Analysis of the difference of immune cell activity between the HCC group and normal group. (c) Correlation diagram of coexpression of core genes; blue represents negative correlation and red represents positive correlation. (d) Heatmap of correlation between CGRSB and immune cells. (e) Survival curves of different immunocytes.
Figure 8(a) Quality control diagram of single-cell sequencing data from different patients. (b) Correlation scatter plot of total sequencing, mitochondrial, and ribosomal genes in different patients. (c) Cell cluster annotation diagram. (d) The distribution of CGRSB in different cell clusters.
Figure 9Picture captured from the SEER database.