| Literature DB >> 35190600 |
Riccardo Farinella1, Cosmeri Rizzato2, Daria Bottai1, Alice Bedini3, Federica Gemignani1, Stefano Landi1, Giulia Peduzzi1, Sara Rosati3, Antonella Lupetti4, Armando Cuttano3,5, Francesca Moscuzza3, Cristina Tuoni3, Luca Filippi6, Massimiliano Ciantelli3,5, Arianna Tavanti1, Daniele Campa1.
Abstract
Recent studies indicate the existence of a complex microbiome in the meconium of newborns that plays a key role in regulating many host health-related conditions. However, a high variability between studies has been observed so far. In the present study, the meconium microbiome composition and the predicted microbial metabolic pathways were analysed in a consecutive cohort of 96 full-term newborns. The effect of maternal epidemiological variables on meconium diversity was analysed using regression analysis and PERMANOVA. Meconium microbiome composition mainly included Proteobacteria (30.95%), Bacteroidetes (23.17%) and Firmicutes (17.13%), while for predicted metabolic pathways, the most abundant genes belonged to the class "metabolism". We observed a significant effect of maternal Rh factor on Shannon and Inverse Simpson indexes (p = 0.045 and p = 0.049 respectively) and a significant effect of delivery mode and maternal antibiotic exposure on Jaccard and Bray-Curtis dissimilarities (p = 0.001 and 0.002 respectively), while gestational age was associated with observed richness and Shannon indexes (p = 0.018 and 0.037 respectively), and Jaccard and Bray-Curtis dissimilarities (p = 0.014 and 0.013 respectively). The association involving maternal Rh phenotype suggests a role for host genetics in shaping meconium microbiome prior to the exposition to the most well-known environmental variables, which will influence microbiome maturation in the newborn.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35190600 PMCID: PMC8861021 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06792-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Epidemiological variables of the population in study.
| Variables | Na | Mean | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (weeks) | 96 | 39.65 | 1.16 |
| Maternal age (years) | 96 | 34.72 | 5.25 |
| Gravidic weight increase (kilograms) | 93 | 12.66 | 4.32 |
| Sex | Male: 54 Female:42 | – | – |
| Maternal Rh factor | Positive: 85 Negative: 10 | – | – |
| Maternal diabetes | Yes: 24 No: 72 | – | – |
| Maternal antibiotic exposure | Untreated : 46 Treated: 49 | – | – |
| Delivery modeb | CSD : 42 VD: 54 | – | – |
a—refers to the number of couples mother-newborn for which data were available for each epidemiological variable; b—“CSD” stands for caesarean delivery, while “VD stands for vaginal delivery.
Figure 1Box plots of alpha diversity by maternal Rh factor. The three panels (a), (b) and (c) report the observed richness index, Shannon index and Inverse Simpson index respectively.
Association between clinical and anthropometric variables and alpha diversity indexes.
| Independent variable | Outcome | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observed Richness | Shannon index | Inverse Simpson index | ||||
| Coeff. (95%CI) | p-value | Coeff. (95%CI) | p-value | Coeff. (95%CI) | p-value | |
| Delivery mode | 6.823(−1.805–15.451) | 0.125 | 0.285(−0.096–0.665) | 0.143 | 1.074(−0.316–2.464) | 0.130 |
| Maternal diabetics statusa | −8.546(−18.307–1.215) | 0.086 | −0.371(−1.018–0.433) | 0.091 | −1.476(−3.044–0.092) | 0.065 |
| Sexa | 2.950(−5.558–11.459) | 0.498 | 0.157(−0.217–0.531) | 0.411 | 0.370(−1.002–1.742) | 0.597 |
| Gestational agea | −4.270(−7.805–0.736) | −0.167(−0.323–0.010) | −0.524(−1.100–0.052) | 0.075 | ||
| Maternal agea | −0.558(−1.358–0.242) | 0.175 | −0.002(−0.033–0.037) | 0.918 | 0.025(−0.105–0.155) | 0.704 |
| Gravidic weight increasea | 0.165(−0.847–1.176) | 0.750 | 0.009(−0.036–0.053) | 0.703 | 0.023(−0.140–0.186) | 0.782 |
| Maternal antibiotic exposure | 3.072(−5.705–11.849) | 0.494 | 0.174(−0.210–0.558) | 0.377 | 0.623(−0.788–2.034) | 0.389 |
| Maternal Rh factora | −8.503(−18.137–1.130) | 0.078 | −0.571(−1.130–0.011) | −1.688(−3.372–0.004) | ||
All analyses were adjusted for the DNA extraction batch used.
Significant values are in bold.
Figure 2Ordination plot for the first two principal coordinates based on Bray–Curtis (upper plots) and Jaccard (lower plots) dissimilarities reported by, from left to right, maternal antibiotic exposure (a, d), delivery mode (b, e) and gestational age (c, f). For simplicity of graphical representation, gestational age is reported using quartiles.
Results of the PERMANOVA test using Bray–Curtis and Jaccard dissimilarities.
| Bray–Curtis | Jaccard | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | p-value | R2 | p-value | |
| Sexa | 0.011 | 0.322 | 0.01 | 0.369 |
| Maternal diabetesa | 0.009 | 0.436 | 0.009 | 0.469 |
| Gestational agea | 0.030 | 0.025 | ||
| Delivery modea | 0.051 | 0.037 | ||
| Maternal agea | 0.007 | 0.678 | 0.007 | 0.748 |
| Gravidic weight increasea | 0.005 | 0.858 | 0.007 | 0.807 |
| Maternal antibiotic exposure | 0.044 | 0.034 | ||
| Maternal Rh factora | 0.018 | 0.143 | 0.015 | 0.155 |
Significant values are in bold.
aThe sequential test was done adjusting for the used DNA extraction batch.
Results of the PERMANOVA test using both delivery mode and antibiotic exposure.
| First sequential test | Bray–Curtis | Jaccard | Second sequential test | Bray–Curtis | Jaccard | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | p-value | R2 | p-value | R2 | p-value | R2 | p-value | ||
| Maternal antibiotic exposure | 0.044 | 0.034 | Delivery mode | 0.5 | 0.037 | ||||
| Delivery mode | 0.028 | 0.022 | Maternal antibiotic exposure | 0.022 | 0.019 | ||||
Both sequential tests were adjusted for DNA extraction batch as first covariate. In the first test, maternal antibiotic exposure was added as covariate prior to delivery mode, while in the second test their order was inverted.
Significant values are in bold.