Literature DB >> 35190200

Modern radiographic imaging in multiple myeloma, what is the minimum requirement?

Esther Mena1, Evrim B Turkbey2, Liza Lindenberg3.   

Abstract

Imaging innovations offer useful techniques applicable to many oncology specialties. Treatment advances in the field of multiple myeloma (MM) have increased the need for accurate diagnosis, particularly in the bone marrow, which is an essential component in myeloma-defining criteria. Modern imaging identifies osteolytic lesions, distinguishes solitary plasmacytoma from MM, and evaluates the presence of extramedullary disease. Furthermore, imaging is increasingly valuable in post-treatment response assessment. Detection of minimal residual disease after therapy carries prognostic implications and influences subsequent treatment planning. Whole-body low-dose Computed Tomography is now recommended over the conventional skeletal survey, and more sophisticated functional imaging methods, such as 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography , and diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging are proving effective in the assessment and monitoring of MM disease. This review focuses on understanding indications and advantages of these imaging modalities for diagnosing and managing myeloma.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35190200      PMCID: PMC9149049          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   5.385


  57 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of focal lesions in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jens Hillengass; Kerstin Fechtner; Marc-André Weber; Tobias Bäuerle; Sofia Ayyaz; Christiane Heiss; Thomas Hielscher; Thomas M Moehler; Gerlinde Egerer; Kai Neben; Anthony D Ho; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Stefan Delorme; Hartmut Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The radiological demonstration of osseous metastases. Experimental observations.

Authors:  G A Edelstyn; P J Gillespie; F S Grebbell
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Diagnostic value of whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) in bone lesions detection in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Valeria Besostri; Pietro Andrea Bonaffini; Fausto Rossini; Alessandro Di Lelio; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  Whole-body MRI of bone marrow: A review.

Authors:  John P Hynes; Nicola Hughes; Patricia Cunningham; Eoin C Kavanagh; Stephen J Eustace
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for evaluation of response in multiple myeloma patients following bortezomib-based therapy: A large single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Xing Xiong; Zhengzheng Fu; Hui Dai; Feirong Yao; Dong Liu; Shengming Deng; Chunhong Hu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT for imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in multiple myeloma - Comparison to [18F]FDG and laboratory values.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Martin Schreder; Andreas Schirbel; Samuel Samnick; Klaus Martin Kortüm; Ken Herrmann; Saskia Kropf; Herrmann Einsele; Andreas K Buck; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Stefan Knop; Katharina Lückerath
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

7.  Whole-body computed tomography versus conventional skeletal survey in patients with multiple myeloma: a study of the International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors:  J Hillengass; L A Moulopoulos; S Delorme; V Koutoulidis; J Mosebach; T Hielscher; M Drake; S V Rajkumar; B Oestergaard; N Abildgaard; M Hinge; T Plesner; Y Suehara; K Matsue; N Withofs; J Caers; A Waage; H Goldschmidt; M A Dimopoulos; S Lentzsch; B Durie; E Terpos
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 11.037

8.  Combination of flow cytometry and functional imaging for monitoring of residual disease in myeloma.

Authors:  L Rasche; D Alapat; M Kumar; G Gershner; J McDonald; C P Wardell; R Samant; R Van Hemert; J Epstein; A F Williams; S Thanendrarajan; C Schinke; M Bauer; C Ashby; R G Tytarenko; F van Rhee; B A Walker; M Zangari; B Barlogie; F E Davies; G J Morgan; N Weinhold
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Identifying CD38+ cells in patients with multiple myeloma: first-in-human imaging using copper-64-labeled daratumumab.

Authors:  Amrita Krishnan; Vikram Adhikarla; Erasmus K Poku; Joycelynne Palmer; Ammar Chaudhry; Van Eric Biglang-Awa; Nicole Bowles; Nitya Nathwani; Michael Rosenzweig; Firoozeh Sahebi; Chatchada Karanes; Jennifer Simpson; James F Sanchez; Dave Yamauchi; Maria Parayno; Arnab Chowdhury; Enrico Caserta; Guido Marcucci; Russell Rockne; Anna M Wu; Jeffrey Wong; Stephen J Forman; David Colcher; Paul Yazaki; John Shively; Flavia Pichiorri
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-27

10.  11C-Methionine-PET: a novel and sensitive tool for monitoring of early response to treatment in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Katharina Lückerath; Constantin Lapa; Christa Albert; Ken Herrmann; Gerhard Jörg; Samuel Samnick; Herrmann Einsele; Stefan Knop; Andreas K Buck
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.