Literature DB >> 35189867

Severe maternal morbidity: admission shift from intensive care unit to obstetric high-dependency unit.

Ning Gu1, Yaning Zheng1, Yimin Dai2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To study temporal trends of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in obstetric population after the introduction of obstetric high-dependency unit (HDU).
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of consecutive obstetric patients admitted to the ICU/HDU in a provincial referral center in China from January 2014 to December 2019. The collected information included maternal demographic characteristics, indications for ICU and HDU admission, the length of ICU stay, the total length of in-hospital stay and APACHE II score. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used to determine statistical significance. The temporal changes were assessed with chi-square test for linear trend.
RESULTS: A total of 40,412 women delivered and 447 (1.11%) women were admitted to ICU in this 6-year period. The rate of ICU admission peaked at 1.59% in 2016 and then dropped to 0.67% in 2019 with the introduction of obstetric HDU. The average APACHE II score increased significantly from 6.8 to 12.3 (P < 0.001) and the average length of ICU stay increased from 1.7 to 7.1 days (P < 0.001). The main indications for maternal ICU admissions were hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (39.8%), cardiac diseases (24.8%), and other medical disorders (21.5%); while the most common reasons for referring to HDU were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (46.5%) and obstetric hemorrhage (43.0%). The establishment of HDU led to 20% reduction in ICU admission, which was mainly related to obstetric indications.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of HDU helps to reduce ICU utilization in obstetric population.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  High dependency unit; Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy; Intensive care unit; Pre-existing medical disease; Severe maternal morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35189867      PMCID: PMC8862286          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04480-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


Background

Admission of pregnant or postpartum women to intensive care unit (ICU) is an indicator of severe maternal morbidity and an endpoint for clinical audit in quality of care [1]. Despite the proportion of high-risk pregnancies in China increased from 15.7 to 24.7%, maternal mortality rates decreased from 34.2 per 100,000 to 18.3 per 100,000 live births from 2008 to 2018 [2], which implied an improvement in perinatal care. On the other hand, the growth of complicated pregnancies caused an increase in maternal ICU admissions [3], which meant a rising need of medical resources and expenses. Therefore, monitoring of the trend of ICU admission may help us understand the reasons for the change and develop interventions to improve medical service. High dependency unit (HDU) provides a level of care which lies in between a general ward and an ICU, which has been suggested to reduce the need for ICU beds [4]. As previous researches from China showed, the incidence of pregnancy related ICU admission varied from 0.56 to 1.6% [3, 5]. However, little was known about the respective roles of obstetric HDU and ICU in caring severe maternal morbidity in this region. Accordingly, the present study aims to study the temporal trend of ICU admission with the introduction of maternal HDU and assess the characteristics of pregnancy-related ICU and HDU admissions.

Methods

Study design and settings

This is a retrospective study of consecutive obstetric patients admitted to the ICU/HDU of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019. The obstetric service in this hospital has high patient acuity and was accredited as a provincial referral center for severe maternal morbidity in 2016. To cope with the rising demand for a higher level of care, the institute introduced obstetric HDU in 2017. The general ICU was a 20-bed unit led by intensivists, whereas the obstetric HDU was a 5-bed unit staffed with obstetricians and specialized nurses. The research has been approved by the Ethical Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital and a waiver of individual informed consent was granted. Information of cases admitted to ICU of any causes during the pregnancy or within 42 days postpartum was abstracted from medical records and did not identify participants. Women delivered in other institutions and transferred to the hospital in postpartum period were excluded in the analysis.

Participants and Variables

The women’s characteristics included age, parity, type of pregnancy (singleton or multiple), gestational age of delivery and mode of delivery (vaginal or cesarean delivery). The ICU admission information included the length of ICU stay, the total length of in-hospital stay and APACHE II score [6], calculated within 24 h of ICU admission based on the worst clinical, and physiologic indicators. The indications for ICU/HDU admissions were classified into obstetric and non-obstetric complications. Organ dysfunction was defined using the WHO Working Group approach [7], which included clinical criteria, laboratory markers and management-based proxies. If a woman was admitted to the ICU more than once, the stay with the worst clinical manifestations (the highest APACHE II score or the longest stay) were included in this study.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 26.0. Normally distributed data were presented as mean with SD; and categorical outcomes were summarized using frequency distributions. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used to determine statistical significance. The temporal changes were assessed with chi-square test for linear trend. To estimate the associations between maternal clinical features and ICU admission, characteristics (age, obesity, multiple pregnancy, pre-gestational hypertension, pre-gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, and placenta previa) for women with and without ICU admission were compared using Chi-square tests, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate OR of ICU admission while adjusting for maternal risk factors and the introduction of HDU. A p value of 0.05 was used as the cut-point for significance.

Results

During this 6-year period, a total of 40,412 women delivered at the hospital and 447 women were admitted to ICU, making an overall ICU admission rate of 1.11%. The rate peaked at 1.59% in 2016 and then dropped to 0.67% in 2019 (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of women with pregnancy-related ICU admissions

Overall201420152016201720182019P
ICU admissionn = 447n = 52n = 56n = 117n = 102n = 70n = 50
No. of deliveries40,412573752697357742871077514
Rate of ICU admission (%)1.110.911.061.591.370.980.67<0.001
Age (mean ± sd)29.4 ± 5.329.1 ± 5.329.1 ± 5.729.1 ± 4.929.6 ± 4.829.6 ± 5.830.3 ± 5.70.818
Age ≥ 35 years n (%)75 (16.8)7 (13.5)12 (21.4)17 (14.5)17(16.7)11 (15.7)11 (22.0)0.545
Nulliparous n (%)291 (65.1)47 (90.4)47 (83.9)71 (60.7)59 (57.8)37 (52.9)30 (60.0)<0.001
Multiple pregnancy n (%)39 (8.7)5 (9.6)2 (3.6)12 (10.3)11(10.8)5 (7.1)4 (8.1)0.691
Pre-gestational BMI ≥28 kg/m2 n (%)25 (5.6)2 (3.8)5 (8.9)3 (2.6)4 (3.9)6 (8.6)5 (10.0)0.209
GA at deliverya0.145
<28 wks n (%)63 (14.2)5 (9.6)14 (25.0)12 (10.3)13 (12.7)8 (11.6)11 (22.0)
28-31+6 wks n (%)86 (19.3)8 (15.4)11 (19.6)21 (18.1)24 (23.5)11 (15.9)11 (22.0)
32-36+6 wks n (%)174 (39.1)17 (32.7)16 (28.6)51 (44.0)40 (39.2)32 (46.4)18 (36.0)
≥37 wks n (%)122 (27.4)22 (42.3)15 (26.8)32 (27.6)25 (24.5)18 (26.1)10 (20.4)
Cesarean deliveries n (%)383 (85.7)45 (86.5)45 (80.4)104 (88.9)89 (87.3)60 (85.7)40 (80.0)0.662
Postpartum admission n (%)394 (88.1)49 (94.2)52 (92.9)108 (92.3)94(92.2)57 (81.4)34 (68.0)<0.001
APACHE II score (mean ± sd)10.5 ± 5.66.8 ± 3.69.4 ± 8.111.3 ± 5.010.9 ± 4.810.9 ± 5.312.3 ± 5.2<0.001
Length of ICU stay (d) (mean ± sd)4.5 ± 6.61.7 ± 1.63.3 ± 4.53.7 ± 4.25.2 ± 8.65.9 ± 7.47.1 ± 8.5<0.001
In-hospital stay (d) (mean ± sd)11.7 ± 8.88.4 ± 3.610.4 ± 6.910.8 ± 6.912.5 ± 10.113.8 ± 11.514.1 ± 9.80.002
ICU mortality rate n (%)9 (1.9)0 (0)1(1.8)2 (1.7)3 (2.9)1 (1.4)2 (4.0)0.802

a Two cases of maternal death before delivery in 2016 and 2018 respectively

There were 9 maternal deaths and the maternal mortality rates were 2.0 per 100 ICU admissions and 22.3 per 100,000 hospital deliveries. No significant differences were found regarding the yearly ICU mortality rates. Cardiac diseases were the leading cause of maternal death (5/9, including 3 cases of severe pulmonary hypertension, one case of heart failure secondary to Sjogren syndrome and one woman with prosthetic valve thrombosis), followed by infections (2/9, one with severe virus pneumonia and one with septic miscarriage), lymphoma (1/9) and cerebral hemorrhage (1/9).

Demographics of Pregnancy-related ICU admission

Overall, the mean age of the women admitted to the ICUs was 29.4 years; 16.8% were 35 years of age or older (Table 1). Nulliparous women comprised 65.1% of the ICU admissions, and the proportion decreased over time (P < 0.001). Most of the patients were admitted during the postpartum period (88.1%) and had undergone cesarean deliveries (85.7%). Characteristics of women with pregnancy-related ICU admissions a Two cases of maternal death before delivery in 2016 and 2018 respectively The average APACHE II score, an indicator of severity, increased significantly from 6.8 in 2014 to 12.3 in 2019 (P < 0.001). At the same time, the average length of ICU stay increased from 1.7 day to 7.1 days (P < 0.001), and the mean hospital stay increased from 8.4 to 14.1 days (P = 0.002).

Indications for maternal ICU admission

The main causes for maternal ICU admission were hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (39.8%), cardiac diseases (24.8%), and other medical disorders (21.5%) (Table 2). Women could have had more than one complication. Over the 6-year period, the proportion of obstetric hemorrhage (from 25.0 to 4.0%; P = 0.015) and hypertensive disorders (from 46.2 to 28.0%; P = 0.034) decreased significantly, whereas the percentage of cardiac diseases increased from 26.9 to 42.0% (P = 0.024).
Table 2

Indications for Pregnancy-Related ICU Admissionsa

Overall201420152016201720182019P trend
No. of ICU admission44752561171027050
Obstetric Indications
 Hemorrhage56 (12.5)13 (25.0)3 (5.4)18 (15.4)13 (12.7)7 (10.0)2 (4.0)0.015
 Hypertensive disorders178 (39.8)24 (46.2)26 (46.4)45 (38.5)46 (45.1)23 (32.9)14 (28.0)0.034
 Obstetric infections11 (2.5)1 (1.9)3 (5.4)2 (1.7)2 (2.0)3 (4.3)0 (0)0.609
 Amniotic fluid embolism4 (0.9)2 (3.8)0 (0)1 (0.9)0 (0)0 (0)1 (2.0)0.319
 Acute fatty liver of pregnancy17 (3.8)2 (3.8)0 (0)5 (4.3)6 (5.9)3 (4.3)1 (2.0)0.740
 Other obstetric complications6 (1.3)1 (1.9)2 (3.6)1 (0.9)1 (1.0)1 (1.4)0 (0)0.272
Non-obstetric Indications
 Cardiac diseases111 (24.8)14 (26.9)12 (21.4)20 (17.1)23 (22.5)21 (30.0)21 (42.0)0.024
 Non-obstetric infections16 (3.6)0 (0)1 (1.8)3 (2.6)6 (5.9)4 (5.7)2 (4.0)0.071
 Pancreatitis26 (5.8)0 (0)2 (3.6)7 (6.0)7 (6.9)5 (7.1)5 (10.0)0.024
 Other medical disorders96 (21.5)16 (30.8)12 (21.4)26 (22.2)20 (19.6)9 (12.9)13 (26.0)0.190
Organ Dysfunctions
 Cardiovascular dysfunction83 (18.6)3 (5.8)5 (8.9)14 (12.0)23 (22.5)22 (31.4)16 (32.0)<0.001
 Respiratory dysfunction130 (29.1)6 (11.5)16 (28.6)40 (34.2)24 (23.5)22 (31.4)22 (44.0)0.007
 Renal dysfunction40 (8.9)0 (0)7 (12.5)8 (6.8)15 (14.7)5 (7.1)5 (10.0)0.170
 Hematological dysfunction112 (25.1)12 (23.1)14 (25.0)31 (2.6)26 (25.5)14 (20.0)15 (30.0)0.832
 Hepatic dysfunction17 (3.8)2 (3.8)1 (1.8)7 (6.0)6 (5.9)0 (0)1 (2.0)0.420
 Neurological dysfunction20 (4.5)0 (0)3 (5.4)6 (5.1)5 (4.9)1 (1.4)5 (10.0)0.182
 Uterine dysfunction13 (2.9)2 (3.8)2 (3.6)5 (4.3)1 (1.0)2 (2.9)1 (2.0)0.366

aPatients can have more than one indication

Indications for Pregnancy-Related ICU Admissionsa aPatients can have more than one indication In the analysis of the breakdown of maternal organ dysfunctions (Table 2), respiratory dysfunction (29.1%) had the highest incidence, followed by hematological dysfunction (25.1%) and cardiovascular dysfunction (18.6%). From 2014 to 2019, both respiratory dysfunction rates (11.5 - 44.0%, P = 0.007) and cardiovascular dysfunction rates (5.8 - 32.0%, P < 0.001) showed increasing trends.

Decrease in ICU admission after introduction of HDU

After the introduction of HDU, the rate of ICU admission reduced by 18.0% (1.23% in 2014-16 vs. 1.01% in 2017-19), and HDU admission (1575 cases) amounted to 7.15% of total obstetric population. The obstetric indications for HDU admissions were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (733, 46.5%), obstetric hemorrhage (678, 43.0%), other pregnancy complications (16, 1.0%), and obstetric infections (2, 0.1%). Heart diseases (74, 4.7%), other medical disorders (161, 10.2%), pancreatitis (6, 0.4%), and non-obstetric infections (3, 0.2%) accounted for the non-obstetric causes. The cause-specific rates of pregnancy-related ICU admissions significantly decreased for hypertensive disorders (OR = 0.573, 95% CI =0.424-0.775) and obstetric hemorrhage (OR = 0.518, 95% CI =0.302-0.888) in 2017-2019 (Table 3).
Table 3

Indications for HDU and ICU admissions before and after establishment of HDUa

2014-20162017-2019OR (95%CI) b
nICU admission n (%)nICU and HDUadmission n (%)HDU admission n (%)ICU admission n (%)
Obstetric hemorrhage253934 (1.3)3151700 (22.2)678 (21.5)22 (0.7)0.518 (0.302-0.888)
Hypertensive disorders146895 (6.5)2176816 (37.5)733 (33.7)83 (3.8)0.573 (0.424-0.775)
Obstetric infections2076 (2.9)3337 (2.1)2 (0.6)5 (1.5)0.511 (0.154-1.695)
Cardiac diseases26346 (17.5)403139 (27.6)74 (18.4)65 (16.1)0.907 (0.599-1.373)
Non-obstetric infections254 (16.0)3715 (40.5)3 (8.1)12 (32.4)2.520 (0.707-8.988)
Pancreatitis169 (56.3)3123 (74.2)6 (19.4)17 (54.8)0.944 (0.280-3.183)

aPatients can have more than one indication. b Odds ratios for indication-specific ICU admission rates before and after establishment of HDU

Indications for HDU and ICU admissions before and after establishment of HDUa aPatients can have more than one indication. b Odds ratios for indication-specific ICU admission rates before and after establishment of HDU

Contribution of maternal risk factors to ICU admission

In the obstetric population, the incidence of maternal age ≥ 35 years (10.5 - 14.3%, P < 0.001), pre-gestational BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2 (0.4 - 3.5%, P < 0.001), multiple pregnancies (3.9 - 5.0%, P < 0.001), pre-gestational hypertension (1.2 - 1.8%, P = 0.001) and preeclampsia (4.9 - 6.3%, P < 0.001) increased significantly from 2014 to 2019 (Table 4).
Table 4

Temporal Trends in the proportion of women with high-risk pregnanciesa

201420152016201720182019P trend
No. of deliveries573752697357742871077514
Maternal age ≥ 35 years603 (10.5)741 (14.1)1068 (14.5)1387 (18.7)1119 (15.7)1071 (14.3)<0.001
Multiple pregnancies224 (3.9)282 (5.4)342 (4.6)413 (5.6)442 (6.2)377 (5.0)<0.001
Pre-gestational BMI ≥ 28 kg/m224 (0.4)110 (2.1)140 (1.9)134 (1.8)187 (2.6)265 (3.5)<0.001
Pre-gestational hypertension71 (1.2)72 (1.4)119 (1.6)142 (1.9)128 (1.8)138 (1.8)0.001
Pre-gestational diabetes92 (1.6)62 (1.2)76 (1.0)71 (1.0)90 (1.3)117 (1.6)0.768
Placenta previa115 (2.0)155 (2.9)176 (2.4)211 (2.8)193 (2.7)172 (2.3)0.519
Gestational diabetes1107 (19.3)527 (10.0)779 (10.6)930 (12.5)763 (10.7)798 (10.6)<0.001
Preeclampsia280 (4.9)279 (5.3)444 (6.0)468 (6.3)437 (6.1)475 (6.3)<0.001

aValues are given as number (percentage)

Temporal Trends in the proportion of women with high-risk pregnanciesa aValues are given as number (percentage) Associations between maternal risk factors and ICU admission are included in Table 5. Women with pre-eclampsia were found to have the highest adjusted odds of ICU admission (aOR =7.752, 95% CI = 6.211-9.709), followed by placenta previa (aOR =3.571, 95% CI = 2.463-5.181) and pre-gestational diabetes (aOR =2.538, 95% CI =1.656-3.891). After adjusting for the maternal risk factors, the establishment of HDU was related to 20% reduction of ICU admission (aOR =0.796, 95% CI =0.658-0.962). Pre-gestational obesity, multiple pregnancy and pre-gestational hypertension were not independent risk factors for ICU admission.
Table 5

Maternal risk factors for ICU admission

Crude OR (95% CI)Adjusted OR (95% CI)a
Maternal age ≥ 35 years1.161 (0.904-1.490)
Multiple birth1.776 (1.275-2.474)1.211 (0.860-1.706)
Pre-gestational BMI ≥28 kg/m22.776 (1.844-4.180)1.073 (0.676-1.704)
Pre-gestational hypertension4.459 (2.952-6.736)0.977(0.621-1.536)
Pre-gestational diabetes4.731 (3.154-7.049)2.538 (1.656-3.891)
Placenta previa2.944 (2.044-4.241)3.571 (2.463-5.181)
Gestational diabetes0.790 (0.578-1.081)
Preeclampsia8.002 (6.540-9.791)7.752 (6.211-9.709)
Establishment of HDU0.820 (0.680-0.988)0.796 (0.658-0.962)

aOdds ratios were adjusted for multiple birth, pre-gestational BMI ≥28 kg/m2, pre-gestational hypertension, pre-gestational diabetes, placenta previa, preeclampsia and establishment of HDU

Maternal risk factors for ICU admission aOdds ratios were adjusted for multiple birth, pre-gestational BMI ≥28 kg/m2, pre-gestational hypertension, pre-gestational diabetes, placenta previa, preeclampsia and establishment of HDU

Discussion

This is the first study analyzing HDU in management of severe maternal morbidity in China. In this study from a large referral center in China, the ICU admission rate decreased by 20%, whereas the severity of the cases increased after introduction of obstetric HDU. Nonetheless, the maternal mortality rate remained stable. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was the most common cause for ICU and HDU admission, while cardiac diseases and hemorrhage accounted for the second largest proportion in ICU and HDU cases respectively. The research showed a rising trend of high-risk pregnancies in our population, which resulted in an increased demand for higher level of care. The rate of HDU admission in this study was 7.1%, which was higher than the UK survey (4.2%) [8] and lower than two single center reports from India (11.1 and 11.2%) [9, 10]. The variations were likely to be influenced by annual birth rate, characteristics of the population, and criteria for transferring women to ICU. Similar to the literatures [9, 10], our research showed the main indications for high dependency care were obstetric reasons and the introduction of HDU caused a significate reduction in obstetric hemorrhage and hypertensive disorders related ICU admission, while women with severe medical co-morbidities and women with organ dysfunction still needed ICU care. It is notable that our obstetric HDU has a relatively large capacity and situated in the obstetric wards rather than close to the ICU; therefore, high-risk patients who would otherwise have been managed in general ward were managed in HDU. For example, patients requiring intravenous antihypertensive drugs or close monitoring of input and output now received specialized care by the HDU team. Whether obstetric HDU can improve patient outcomes remained uncertain [11]. In our practices, doctors and nurses believed that the integration of intermediate care in obstetric practice benefited patient safety and reduced work stress. ICU provides invasive monitoring and organ support to women with severe morbidity. Since we triaged women towards different level of units, the case severity of ICU admission increased significantly, as we showed a rising trend in the APACHE II score and length of stay among ICU cases. Consistent with other studies [3, 5, 12], cardiac diseases and other medical disorders accounted for the majority of non-obstetric indications in our ICU admissions and often required invasive hemodynamic monitoring, mechanical ventilation and multidisciplinary management. We also noticed that women with non-obstetric indications were more complicated than those with obstetric indications. Eight out of nine maternal mortalities in our cohort were due to non-obstetric causes and the proportion of medical disorder indicated ICU admissions remained unchanged after HDU introduction. In addition to triage of less severe patients to HDU, the decrease in obstetric hemorrhage related ICU admission was also attributable to our institutional quality improvement project targeted to prevent complications in severe postpartum hemorrhage [13]. After the introduction of a criteria-based clinical audit, maternal morbidity rate and blood transfusion rate in postpartum hemorrhage cases decreased significantly. This finding is in agreement with a multi-center research that instituting a protocol for the treatment of maternal hemorrhage significantly reduced the incidence of blood transfusion [14]. The present study showed a significant association between pre-eclampsia and ICU admission, which was similar with previous researches [12, 15]. In Lin’s study, obstetric ICU admission was nearly 4 times higher in women with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy [12]. Hitti et al. found that preeclampsia with severe features had the strongest association with severe maternal complications, followed by preeclampsia without severe features and chronic hypertension [15]. It is interesting that in the current study women with preeclampsia had over 7 folds higher risk for ICU admission, while chronic hypertension was not an independent risk factor. The reason for this disparity might be related to our referral system, where most women with chronic hypertension were referred to tertiary care in early pregnancy [16], whereas women with pre-eclampsia were often late-referrals with delayed diagnosis and suboptimal management [17]. This fact also implied that patients with uncomplicated hypertension could be safely managed in HDU, while preeclamptic patients with organ dysfunction frequently need intensive care. To reduce severe maternal complications related to preeclampsia, potential strategies include first trimester screening and prediction [18], low-dose aspirin prevention, early detection and tighter blood pressure control [19, 20].

Generalizability and Limitations

The findings in this paper are based on a tertiary care, university-based hospital that cares for a higher percentage of medically complicated pregnancies. The high medical acuity of this population lends itself to a close evaluation of the changes in the characteristics of ICU admissions after introduction of obstetric HDU. A major limitation of our study is that it relies on a single center data. The outcomes would be fairly comparable with referral centers and may not be representative to population of our region. Therefore, it is possible that the increased trend in medical co-morbidities this study is caused by an increased number of referral and not a reflection of trend in the population. Moreover, there is no standardized criteria for HDU admission, which hampers comparison of data between reports and the interpretation of outcomes.

Conclusions

Our study highlights the increasing role of HDU in management of severe maternal morbidities. Shifting of care for women with severe postpartum hemorrhage and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy to HDU may spare the ICU service for the more complex medical conditions. Whether providing intermediate care is cost-effective needs to be investigated in further studies.
  17 in total

1.  The role of a high-dependency unit in a regional obstetric hospital.

Authors:  M Ryan; V Hamilton; M Bowen; P McKenna
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Comprehensive maternal hemorrhage protocols reduce the use of blood products and improve patient safety.

Authors:  Laurence E Shields; Suzanne Wiesner; Janet Fulton; Barbara Pelletreau
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Contribution of hypertension to severe maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Jane Hitti; Laura Sienas; Suzan Walker; Thomas J Benedetti; Thomas Easterling
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Does intermediate care improve patient outcomes or reduce costs?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  The ICU Is Becoming a Main Battlefield for Severe Maternal Rescue in China: An 8-Year Single-Center Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Liu Yuqi; Guoliang Tan; Shang Chengming; Sun Xuri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kate E Duhig; Jenny Myers; Paul T Seed; Jenie Sparkes; Jessica Lowe; Rachael M Hunter; Andrew H Shennan; Lucy C Chappell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Risk factors of obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit: An 8-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Lin Lin; Yan-Hong Chen; Wen Sun; Jing-Jin Gong; Pu Li; Juan-Juan Chen; Hao Yan; Lu-Wen Ren; Dun-Jin Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Reducing maternal mortality in China in the era of the two-child policy.

Authors:  Jue Liu; Li Song; Geng Qin; Min Liu; Jie Qiu; Wenzhan Jing; Liang Wang; Yue Dai
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-23

10.  The CHIPS Randomized Controlled Trial (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study): Is Severe Hypertension Just an Elevated Blood Pressure?

Authors:  Laura A Magee; Peter von Dadelszen; Joel Singer; Terry Lee; Evelyne Rey; Susan Ross; Elizabeth Asztalos; Kellie E Murphy; Jennifer Menzies; Johanna Sanchez; Amiram Gafni; Michael Helewa; Eileen Hutton; Gideon Koren; Shoo K Lee; Alexander G Logan; Wessel Ganzevoort; Ross Welch; Jim G Thornton; Jean-Marie Moutquin
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.