Literature DB >> 35188535

Orthodontists' perceptions of and adaptations to nonspecialist and direct-to-consumer orthodontic service providers.

Matthew Brown, William Wiltshire, Fabio Henrique de Sa Leitao Pinheiro, Dieter J Schönwetter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate orthodontists' perceived impacts on their practices as a result of general practitioners (GPs) and direct-to-consumer (DTC) orthodontic care providers and the adaptational changes implemented in the past 10 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey was administered to 270 orthodontists in Canada and the United States to determine demographic background, perception of perceived impact, and specific changes implemented to improve practice competitiveness.
RESULTS: More experienced orthodontists (P = .0001) and males (P = .027) were more likely to indicate a perceived impact from GP orthodontics. American orthodontists were significantly more likely than Canadian orthodontists to perceive an impact from DTC providers (P = .017). There was a positive association with orthodontists' years of experience and having implemented adaptational changes to their practice for a period greater than 10 years across multiple categories. Female orthodontists were more likely to have implemented adaptational changes for a period of less than 10 years across multiple categories.
CONCLUSIONS: The perceived impact of GPs providing orthodontic care was greater than that of DTC providers. American orthodontists were significantly more likely to perceive an impact from DTC providers. Orthodontists have experienced a reduction in referrals from GPs and an increase in referred case difficulty. Less experienced and female orthodontists have made the most adaptive changes to their practices in the past 10 years.
© 2022 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct-to-consumer; General dentist orthodontics; Orthodontic practices

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35188535      PMCID: PMC9235391          DOI: 10.2319/070421-533.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.684


  7 in total

1.  Orthodontics and the general practitioner.

Authors:  Gordon J Christensen
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Teledentistry, Do-It-Yourself Orthodontics, and Remote Treatment Monitoring.

Authors:  Neal D Kravitz; Benjamin Burris; David Butler; C William Dabney
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Teledentistry in practice: literature review.

Authors:  Saad Ahmed Khan; Hanan Omar
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  A licensed orthodontist versus do-it-yourself orthodontics.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Park
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Direct to consumer orthodontics: Exploring patient demographic trends and preferences.

Authors:  Brady C Okuda; Sawsan Tabbaa; Michelle Edmonds; Youssef Toubouti; Humam Saltaji
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Gender Differences and Predictors of Practice Ownership in a Sample of Ontario Dentists.

Authors:  Julia C McKay; Atyub Ahmad; Faahim Rashid; Jodi L Shaw; Alicia Clancy; Courtney David; Rafael Figueiredo; Carlos Quiñonez
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  WORK PATTERN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE ORTHODONTISTS IN CANADA.

Authors:  Stephanie Walker; Carlos Flores-Mir; Giseon Heo; Maryam S Amin; Louanne Keenan
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.316

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.