| Literature DB >> 35188021 |
Pengfei Yue1, Weicheng Zhou1, Guiting Huang1, Fangfang Lei1, Yingchong Chen1, Zhilin Ma2, Liru Chen3, Ming Yang1.
Abstract
Pulmonary inhalation administration is an ideal approach to locally treat lung disease and to achieve systemic administration for other diseases. However, the complex nature of the structural characteristics of the lungs often results in the difficulty in the development of lung inhalation preparations. Nanocrystals technology provides a potential formulation strategy for the pulmonary delivery of poorly soluble drugs, owing to the decreased particle size of drug, which is a potential approach to overcome the physiological barrier existing in the lungs and significantly increased bioavailability of drugs. The pulmonary inhalation administration has attracted considerable attentions in recent years. This review discusses the barriers for pulmonary drug delivery and the recent advance of the nanocrystals in pulmonary inhalation delivery. The presence of nanocrystals opens up new prospects for the development of novel pulmonary delivery system. The particle size control, physical instability, potential cytotoxicity, and clearance mechanism of inhaled nanocrystals based formulations are the major considerations in formulation development.Entities:
Keywords: Nanocrystals; bioavailability; lungs; physiological barrier; pulmonary inhalation administration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35188021 PMCID: PMC8865109 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2039809
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Figure 1.The structure of lung and pulmonary mucus barrier.
Figure 2.Preparation methods of nanocrystals based pulmonary inhalation delivery system.
Examples of nanocrystal preparation.
| Drug | Disease | Method of preparation | Stabilizer (concentration) | Average particle size (nm) | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curcumin (Pelikh et al., | Atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and androgenetic alopecia | Bead milling | TPGS ( | 290 | Nanocrystals were efficiently taken up by the hair follicles and more permeable. |
| Andrographolide (Basu et al., | Hepatoprotective | Solvent-diffusion followed by homogenization | Tween 80 (1%) | 630 ± 12 | Aqueous solubility increased nearly fivefold. More significant liver protection effect. |
| Quercetin (Manca et al., | Skin disorders | Wet media milling | P188, Tween 80 | 326–474 | |
| Ginkgolide B (Liu et al., | Parkinson’s disease | Antisolvent precipitation | Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) E5 (0.5 mg/mL) | 83.48 ± 1.77 | |
| Resveratrol (Xiong et al., | Parkinson's disease | Antisolvent precipitation | HPMC (1.8 mg/mL) | 222.54 ± 1.66 | No significant toxic effects on zebrafish embryos and larvae, exhibited more favorable pharmacokinetics than pure RES. |
| Lutein (Chang et al., | Prophylaxis of cardiovascular | Anti-solvent precipitation –ultrasonication | Soy phosphatidylcholine (0.08%) | 110.7 | The |
| Glycyrrhetinic acid (Lei et al., | Chronic hepatitis | Anti-solvent precipitation –ultrasonication | TPGS (0.5%) | 220 | The bioavailability of GA nanocrystals in rats was 4.3-fold higher than that of the coarse GA after oral administration. |
| Pramipexole (Li et al., | Parkinson's disease | Wet media milling | PVP K30 (2.4%) | 352.07 ± 21.29 | |
| Meloxicam (Yu et al., | Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis | Nanoprecipitation technique | Poloxamer 407/Tween 80 (80/20, w/w) (0.1%) | 175 ± 4 | 2.58- and 4.4-fold increase in AUC0 → 24 h was achieved by nanocrystals comparing with solution and suspension. |
| Baicalin (Wei et al., | Anti-oxidant; anti-inflammatory | High-pressure homogenization | TPGS 10% (w/w) | 189.21 ± 0.36 | The transdermal flux of BCA-NC-gel with 1% HLA were 20.65-fold higher ( |
Examples of nanocrystals pulmonary inhalation system.
| Nanocrystals lung inhalation delivery system | Drug | Preparation methods | Effect of drug administration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inhalable nanocrystals based aerosol | Budesonide (Kraft et al., | Nanometer precipitation method | Fast adsorption, less systemic exposure |
| Itraconazole (Rundfeldt et al., | Wet ball mill method | ||
| Betamethasone dipropionate (Song et al., | High pressure homogenization method | ||
| Fluticasone (Chiang et al., | Wet ball mill method | ||
| Coenzyme Q10 (Rossi et al., | High pressure homogenization method | ||
| Beclomethasone (Ostrander et al., | Dielectric grinding method | ||
| Inhalable nanocrystals based composite microparticle | Meloxicam (Pomázi et al., | High pressure uniform method, spray drying method | Deep lung deposition rate and fast dissolution rate |
| Salbutamol sulfate (Bhavna et al., | Antisolvent precipitation method, spray drying method | ||
| Tranilast (Onoue et al., | Wet ball grinding, freeze drying | ||
| Carvedilol (Abdelbary et al., | Antisolvent precipitation ultrasonic method, freeze drying | ||
| Niclosamide (Costabile et al., | High pressure homogenization method, spray drying method | ||
| Budesonide + salbutamol sulphate (Raula et al., | Wet ball milling, aerosol flow reactor | ||
| Breviscapine (Chen et al., | homogenization method, spray drying | ||
| Indometacin (Laaksonen et al., | Wet ball milling, aerosol flow reactor | ||
| A ring spore element (Yamasaki et al., | Antisolvent precipitation method, spray drying method | ||
| Ciprofloxacin (Cipolla et al., | Freeze–thaw method | ||
| Rifampicin (Mehanna et al., | Antisolvent precipitation ultrasonic method, spray drying method | ||
| Inhalable nanocrystals based adhesive microparticles | Budesonide (Liu et al., | Wet ball grinding, spray drying | Prolonged lung retention and slow drug release |
| Resveratrol (Liu et al., | High pressure homogenization method, spray drying method | ||
| Cinaciguat (Ni et al., | High pressure homogenization, spray drying | ||
| Inhalable mucus-penetrating nanocrystals | C109 (Costabile et al., | Nano precipitation, freeze drying | Easily penetrate mucus and reduce drug clearance |
Figure 3.(A) Schematic diagram of BUD-INAM in vitro and in vivo release of BUD, (B) in vitro release profile, (C) retention on the porcine tracheal mucosa surface as a function of time, and (D) plasma concentration–time profiles. Adapted with permission from Liu et al. (2018).
Figure 4.(A) Schematic diagram of PEGylated mucus-penetrating nanocrystals and lung treatment in vivo, (B) in vitro release profile, (C) inhibition ability B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilm, cytotoxicity of C109 formulations to wild type 16HBE (D) and CF (CFBE41o−) bronchial epithelial cells (E). Adapted with permission from Costabile et al. (2020).
Figure 5.(A) Schematic illustration of curcumin nanocrystals on dissolution, airway mucosa penetration, lung tissue distribution, and absorption by pulmonary delivery. (B) Confocal microscopy images of calu-3 cells after incubation with CUR-NCs for 2 h (the scale bar is 50 μm); (C) calu-3 cell viability upon exposure to NC formulations at different drug concentrations; (D) mean fluorescence intensity of cells determined by flow cytometry (n = 3); (E) z-stack confocal images of the calu-3 cell layer with the polyester membrane after transport of NCs formulations for 1 h (the scale bar in xy plane was 50 μm). Adapted with permission from He et al. (2020).