INTRODUCTION: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) contracts with non-VA owned and operated community nursing homes (CNHs) to provide Veterans nursing home care. This study explored VA staffs' experiences coordinating care with CNH staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Qualitative study interviewing VA staff overseeing and coordinating care for CNH Veterans. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes influenced care coordination. (1) Pre-established working relationships strengthened trust in CNH staff and remote access to CNH electronic medical records (EMRs). (2) Remote oversight proved challenging as virtual visits did not fully capture Veterans' needs and Veterans experienced challenges due to cognitive status, hearing impairment, and discomfort with technology. (3) Partnerships strengthened as VA staff provided CNHs personal protective equipment, COVID-19 testing, infection control education, and emotional support. DISCUSSION: Despite pre-existing relationships and improved partnerships, most VA staff felt uncertain about the quality of oversight provided through remote monitoring and preferred in-person interactions. However, they found benefit in remote access to CNH EMRs and shared optimism with expanding virtual care. CONCLUSIONS: Fostering strong partnerships between VAs and CNHs improve care coordination during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and for daily care.
INTRODUCTION: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) contracts with non-VA owned and operated community nursing homes (CNHs) to provide Veterans nursing home care. This study explored VA staffs' experiences coordinating care with CNH staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Qualitative study interviewing VA staff overseeing and coordinating care for CNH Veterans. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes influenced care coordination. (1) Pre-established working relationships strengthened trust in CNH staff and remote access to CNH electronic medical records (EMRs). (2) Remote oversight proved challenging as virtual visits did not fully capture Veterans' needs and Veterans experienced challenges due to cognitive status, hearing impairment, and discomfort with technology. (3) Partnerships strengthened as VA staff provided CNHs personal protective equipment, COVID-19 testing, infection control education, and emotional support. DISCUSSION: Despite pre-existing relationships and improved partnerships, most VA staff felt uncertain about the quality of oversight provided through remote monitoring and preferred in-person interactions. However, they found benefit in remote access to CNH EMRs and shared optimism with expanding virtual care. CONCLUSIONS: Fostering strong partnerships between VAs and CNHs improve care coordination during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and for daily care.
Nursing homes (NHs) have been hit hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic (Powell et al., 2020), with
38% of COVID-related deaths occurring in NHs (Lindsay & Sarita, 2021). NH staff have
faced numerous challenges during the pandemic, including staffing shortages,
inadequate supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE), and concerns about both
the health of residents they care for and their own health and safety (Behrens & Naylor,
2020).In the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) most NH care for Veterans is provided in
community NHs (CNHs) rather than VA NHs, known as Community Living Centers (CLCs),
as not all VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) have CLCs, but all VAMCs must have a CNH
program (Miller et al.,
2015). In 2018, 9808 Veterans received CNH care, and by 2037, the VA
projects that the average daily census in CNHs will increase by 80% (GAO, 2020). VA CNH program
staff collaborate with CNH staff to ensure Veterans in CNHs receive high-quality
care. This proved critical during the pandemic when VAMCs and CNHs navigated policy
changes restricting visitors to CNHs to increase safety of residents and staff and
lower possibilities of virus transmission (VA Department of Veterans Affairs Memorandum,
2020). The objective of this research is to describe experiences of VA
CNH program staff regarding oversight and care coordination for Veterans in CNHs
during the pandemic.
Methods
This study is an extension of a larger study of VA-CNH contracting practices. In
September–October 2020, we invited VA CNH program staff that participated in
interviews for our larger research study to participate in the current study.
Participants were from four VAMCs and included CNH program coordinators, nurses, and
social workers. We emailed program staff up to three invitations, and nine of the 12
VA CNH program staff members who participated in our larger study agreed to
participate in the current study. Reasons for declining included leaving their role,
being too busy, and not responding to invitations to participate. Table 1 shows participant
demographics. Participants provided verbal consent to participate, and two
researchers conducted semi-structured phone interviews with participants at a time
convenient for them. We recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interviews using a
content analysis approach (Elo
et al., 2014). Two researchers (KM and LH) applied line-by-line coding to
data using a combination inductive (codes emerged from the data) and deductive
approach (codes were created a priori based on interview questions) and met
regularly to reach consensus and discuss theme development. We developed themes by
running queries of data based on consensus discussions using Atlas.ti analytic
software. This allowed us to rigorously describe experiences of VA CNH staff
coordinating care with CNHs during the pandemic. The study was approved by Blinded
for Review Institutional Review Board (#18-XXXX).
Table 1.
Participant Demographics (N = 9).
Gender
N
Female
8
Male
1
Race
White
1
Multiracial
8
Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic
9
Education
Bachelor’s degree
2
Master’s degree
7
Age (years)
30–39
1
40–49
3
50–59
3
60–69
2
Role
CNH coordinator
4
VA social worker
2
VA nurse
3
Time in role (years)
0–3
4
4–7
3
≥8
2
Location of associated VAMCs
(n = 4)
Site A
3
Site B
2
Site C
2
Site D
2
Participant Demographics (N = 9).
Results
The danger of spreading the COVID-19 virus in CNHs led to rapid changes in VA CNH
program operations (VA Department of Veterans Affairs Memorandum, 2020). VA Central Office
(VACO) mandated VA CNH program staff halt monthly in-person visits and switch to
remote VA oversight and virtual care. We identified three themes influencing care
coordination and oversight between VA CNH teams and CNHs: 1) value of pre-existing
relationships; 2) adaptations to overseeing and coordinating care; and the 3)
strengthening of working relationships. (Figure 1)
Figure 1.
Veterans Health Administration staff and community nursing homes’
collaborative process during COVID-19 pandemic.
Veterans Health Administration staff and community nursing homes’
collaborative process during COVID-19 pandemic.
Value of pre-existing relationships
Participants described how pre-existing relationships between themselves and CNH
staff facilitated care coordination and oversight during the pandemic. All
participants interviewed had been visiting NHs regularly at least every 45 days,
and from the four VA CNH programs we studied, the number of NH contracts ranged
from 11 to 36 (Department of
Veterans Affairs Sharepoint, 2020). In the VA CNH program, the same
VA social worker and nurse visit contracted NHs at each visit, and participants
described that regularity of visits allowed CNH staff and VA staff to build
relationships. Pre-existing relationships allowed them to continue oversight
through early, regular, and transparent communication and trust between
themselves and CNHs. One participant noted, “When we walk into the room, people
[CNH staff] know who we are, they are happy to see us, they talk with us, they
realize that we are there to help” (Site A, 129). Established Channels
for CommunicationParticipants described well-established channels of communication with CNH staff
due to pre-pandemic working relationships and regular in-person visits to CNHs.
Prior regular email, phone, and in-person communication between participants and
CNH staff assisted in making easier transitions to remote monitoring of care.
Participants highlighted how, thanks to pre-existing relationships, CNH staff
had a VA point of contact during the pandemic, “Once I could not go in at all,
they [CNH staff] knew who I was, the ones I had already formed relationships
with, and they knew they could call me” (Site D, 102).
Transparency
Several participants detailed how relationships with CNH staff allowed for
transparent communication about needs during the pandemic without fear of
negative responses from the VA. One participant noted, “Building these
relationships, it builds trust, and by being able to do that, they [CNH
Staff] are more forthcoming” (Site B, 140). Another participant shared how
pre-existing partnerships allowed for “more honesty and more
transparency…our community partners [can] contact us and have some of those
difficult conversations” like discussing COVID-19 outbreaks with residents
(Site C, 112).
Trusting CNH staff
Participants noted that trusting information shared by CNH staff proved
integral to coordinating and overseeing Veterans’ care as they “did not know
[how] things were going unless they [CNH Staff] decided to call and let me
know or I saw something in the chart review” (Site D, 102). VA staff
underscored the importance of trusting updates provided by CNH staff about
Veterans’ well-being and needs given they could not visit NHs, they were,
“Getting the staff’s side of the information for the most part, what they
write in the chart, and not really getting the Veteran’s perspective” (Site
A, 122).
Adapting to Overseeing and Coordinating Care
Participants shared positive, negative, and mixed feelings about changes to
oversight and care coordination.
Silver linings: VA staff received remote access to Veterans’ CNH medical
records facilitating improved communication
Participants shared the most positive change during the pandemic was accessing
Veterans’ CNH electronic medical records (EMR) remotely, which allowed for
continued care coordination and oversight. While not a replacement to laying
eyes on Veterans, gaining remote access to CNH EMRs acted as a welcome
substitute. Accessing records allowed VA staff to provide health status updates
to Veterans’ family members. In addition, switching to remote oversight allowed
VA staff more time to communicate with VA colleagues and CNH staff. One
participant noted their colleagues were, “available all the time on their
computers, so I think that that’s really provided the opportunity to do a lot
more and, and in some cases, quicker coordination because of the ability to
communicate instantly through instant messaging” (Site C, 112). Another
participant (Site B, 140) noted this made their VA team closer, allowing them to
check in on CNH short-stay Veterans more regularly. This participant also noted
CNH staff were more responsive to VA phone calls compared to pre-pandemic.
Challenges from lack of face-to-face interactions
With monthly in-person visits stopped, VA staff checked in with fewer Veterans,
some stating they checked in with less than 10% of their caseload, despite
attempts to reach them repeatedly by phone. Many shared wanting to “turn back
the clock to before COVID and get back into the building” because they disliked
virtual case management and felt “removed from the Veterans” (Site D, 101).
Another participant described that pre-pandemic they were “better able to assess
their [CNH Veterans’] stress levels or their needs, all through verbal and
facial interactions and…it is much harder to feel like I am really understanding
what they are going through and what they need [during the pandemic]” (Site D,
102).Some participants felt care was de-personalized and more administrative, and they
were gathering “information for spreadsheets” (Site A, 122). One participant
noted, “when you are there and you are walking around together seeing folks, it
gives you opportunities to think of things that you need and I think it does
make a closer collaboration on patient care” (Site A, 121). A participant from
the same VA noted that lack of visiting CNHs had “taken a lot of the joy out of
the work” and they missed “an important piece of how they are [Veterans] doing,
and I know that the nursing staff is struggling, too…this does not feel like it
is as good as it used to be” (Site A, 122).
Telehealth: challenges and optimism
While video and phone telehealth to CNHs increased, one participant described
telehealth as in its infancy (Site C, 112), especially since VAMCs had high
demand to begin or expand telehealth for many VA specialties during the
pandemic. Other participants described how CNH Veterans’ age and confusion
using technology (Site B, 129), as well as lack of interest in video visits,
proved challenging (Site D, 101). Several participants felt video visits
added extra burden to already over-stretched CNH staff and they thus had
reservations about relying on CNH staff to facilitate visits. However, at
one VAMC, a participant noted optimism due to conducting virtual visits with
CNH Veterans’ primary care providers, and how that will improve access to
care going forward (Site A, 122). The VA provided iPads to CNHs in this case
to conduct these visits.
Strengthening Working Relationships
When asked how the pandemic affected relationships with CNHs, several
participants shared they were strengthened due to support provided by VA staff.
One VA staff member shared, “Nursing homes are seeing us more as partners, and I
think before COVID, there was a lot more of seeing us as a referral source and
as a payer source” (Site A, 121). Due to this change, the same participant
believed CNHs were more likely to ask VA staff for assistance, and communicate
needs, going forward.VA staff supported CNH staff through instrumental, informational, and emotional
support.
Instrumental support
All participants described providing instrumental support to CNH staff by
providing PPE to CNHs without adequate supplies. One participant mentioned
conducting and processing COVID-19 tests for Veterans in the CNH because “early
on, nursing homes here could not get tests” (Site A, 121). Another participant
reported helping CNHs by increasing VA payment for Veterans’ care: “We did alter
the rates that we pay them [CNHs] to the higher rate while they had to put them
in private rooms to protect them [Veterans] from the outbreak,” (Site A,
122).
Informational support
Several participants described providing CNH staff information
about managing COVID-19. One participant recommended CNH staff “create a COVID
unit ahead of time for COVID positive patients” and shared best practices for
infection control (Site A, 121). Another participant shared information about
where to obtain PPE from sources besides the VA (Site A, 123).
Emotional support
A few participants described offering emotional support to CNH staff by showing
compassion and providing “moral support [by] sending out emails… saying thank
you for all of your [CNH staff] attention and concern to our community members”
(Site B, 129). Another participant expressed empathy and understanding about
challenges of caring for CNH residents during the pandemic by “having some
compassion for the staff… [communicating] that you have an understanding of how
difficult this is for them” (Site A, 121).
Discussion
Our study highlighted how positive, pre-existing relationships between health systems
and NHs can facilitate adaptations to care coordination during crises, ultimately
strengthening partnerships. Thanks to pre-pandemic relationships, VA staff provided
tangible and emotional support to CNHs. As NHs rebound from the shock and
devastation COVID-19 wielded, it is critical to consider the importance of such
partnerships and the value of clear communication and collaboration when caring for
NH residents. The partnerships described in our study, in which VA and CNH staff
shared goals and information, had mutual respect, exercised improved communication,
and solved problems related to caring for CNH Veterans during the pandemic, reflect
care coordination literature. Specifically, these domains are central to relational
coordination theory, in which high-quality communication supports effective care
coordination (Bolton et al.,
2021).Recent studies echo our findings and underscore the importance of relationships
between NHs and health systems during the pandemic (Archbald-Pannone et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2020). One
study of an academic health system’s post-acute care network shows that rapid
dissemination of a COVID-19 response plan, and subsequent successful care
coordination is facilitated by existing partnerships with NHs (Kim et al., 2020). Moreover, established
partnerships between health systems and NH staff allow for timely provision of
resources like PPE and information about infection control.As partnerships proved critical in managing care for NH residents during the
pandemic, our hope is that our findings that showed VA’s ability to effectively
partner with CNHs can inform how other healthcare systems collaborate with NHs
(Unroe, 2021). One
important change that facilitated care coordination and oversight during the
pandemic in our study was CNHs providing remote EMR access to VA staff. This change,
if sustained, has the potential to improve care coordination by allowing for a
hybrid model of in-person visits and remote monitoring of the CNHs’ EMRs by VA CNH
staff, which will present itself in real time as in-person visits began again per a
VA directive issued in November 2021 (VA Department of Veterans Affairs Memorandum,
2021). While VA staff often are granted remote access to the CNH medical
record, CNH staff do not have similar access to the VA EMR. Accessing Veterans’ VA
records often involves an employee at a CNH to become a without compensation (WOC)
federal employee, and that can take several months and often only allows for
read-only access. Research shows that community providers continue to experience
challenges accessing Veterans’ VA records and integrating community records into the
VA EMR (Haverhals 2018;
Nevedal et al.,
2019; Miller et al.,
2021; Townsend &
Kolchugina, 2006). If such partnerships can be improved between the VA
and CNHs, this could also be extended to NHs providing information about residents
to families in a timely and clear manner, especially during crises (Feder et al., 2021). Recent
research suggests that communication is essential between NHs and families during
the pandemic when loved ones were dying and focusing on clear communication between
family caregivers and NHs during future crises have been proposed (Hado & Friss Feinberg,
2020).Finally, studies of NH staff’s experiences during the pandemic report that staff are
over-burdened and experiencing high levels of stress while managing staff shortages
(White et al.,
2021). Our findings also showed how VA CNH staff experienced stress and
understaffing, but the strength of these partnerships facilitated collaboration with
and support of CNHs by providing instrumental, informational, and emotional support,
despite shifting roles on both sides.Study limitations include sampling VA CNH staff from only four VAMCs and not
gathering perspectives from CNH staff, which would contribute to a fuller picture of
partnerships between CNH and VA staff. Additionally, our study did not interview
Veterans living in CNHs, and interviewing them would have added important
information on the care they received during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusion
We found that the established, prior relationships VA staff had with CNH staff acted
as a solid foundation to continue to deliver quality oversight and care coordination
to CNH Veterans during crises. Our description of how VA staff coordinated care with
CNHs will act as a basis for future partnerships in understanding what CNH partners’
value. Future research is necessary to assist in identifying the best tools to build
effective relationships between health care systems and NHs and offer support beyond
the COVID-19 pandemic.
Authors: Shelli Feder; Dawn Smith; Hilary Griffin; Scott T Shreve; Daniel Kinder; Ann Kutney-Lee; Mary Ersek Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrea L Nevedal; Todd H Wagner; Laura S Ellerbe; Steven M Asch; Christopher J Koenig Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Laurie R Archbald-Pannone; Drew A Harris; Kimberly Albero; Rebecca L Steele; Aaron F Pannone; Justin B Mutter Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Gina Kim; Mengru Wang; Hanh Pan; Giana H Davidson; Alison C Roxby; Jen Neukirch; Danna Lei; Elicia Hawken-Dennis; Louise Simpson; Thuan D Ong Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-05-30 Impact factor: 5.562