Literature DB >> 35187190

The Performance of Sepsis-3 Criteria to Predict Mortality Among Patients With Hematologic Malignancy and Post-transplant who Have Suspected Infection.

Oryan Henig1, Rosemary K B Putler2, Owen Albin3, Twisha S Patel4, Daniel Kaul3, Krishna Rao3, Keith S Kaye3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a leading cause of death, particularly in immunocompromised people. The revised definition of sepsis (Sepsis-3) uses the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA (qSOFA) to identify patients with sepsis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of SOFA, qSOFA, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in immunocompromised patients.
METHODS: Adult immunocompromised patients admitted to Michigan Medicine between 2012 and 2018 with suspected infection were included based on criteria adopted from the Sepsis-3 study. Each clinical score (SOFA ≥2, qSOFA ≥2, SIRS ≥2) was added to the baseline risk model as an ordinal variable as well as a dichotomous variable, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values were calculated. In addition, breakpoints of SOFA between 2 and 10 were assessed to identify the breakpoints with the highest sensitivity and specificity for hospital mortality. The analysis was stratified for intensive care unit (ICU) status.
RESULTS: Of 2822 immunocompromised patients with a mean age of 56.8±15.6 years, 213 (7.5%) died during hospitalization. When added to the baseline risk model, SOFA score had the greatest predictive validity for hospital mortality (AUROC,0.802; 95% CI, 0.771-0.832), followed by qSOFA (AUROC,0.783; 95% CI, 0.754-0.812) and SIRS (AUROC,0.741; 95% CI, 0.708-0.774). Among the SOFA breakpoints that were evaluated, SOFA ≥6 had the greatest predictive validity and a moderate positive likelihood ratio (2.75) for hospital mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The predictive validity for hospital mortality of qSOFA was similar among immunocompromised patients as that reported in the Sepsis-3 study. The sensitivity of qSOFA ≥2 for hospital mortality was low. SOFA ≥6 might be an effective tool to identify immunocompromised patients with suspected infection at high risk for clinical deterioration. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America 2021. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  immunocompromise; qSOFA; sepsis

Year:  2021        PMID: 35187190      PMCID: PMC8849115          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   3.835


  14 in total

1.  MissForest--non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data.

Authors:  Daniel J Stekhoven; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  J L Vincent; R Moreno; J Takala; S Willatts; A De Mendonça; H Bruining; C K Reinhart; P M Suter; L G Thijs
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  S Maitra; A Som; S Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000.

Authors:  Greg S Martin; David M Mannino; Stephanie Eaton; Marc Moss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Laura E Evans; Waleed Alhazzani; Mitchell M Levy; Massimo Antonelli; Ricard Ferrer; Anand Kumar; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Mark E Nunnally; Bram Rochwerg; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Richard J Beale; Geoffrey J Bellinghan; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig Coopersmith; Daniel P De Backer; Craig J French; Seitaro Fujishima; Herwig Gerlach; Jorge Luis Hidalgo; Steven M Hollenberg; Alan E Jones; Dilip R Karnad; Ruth M Kleinpell; Younsuk Koh; Thiago Costa Lisboa; Flavia R Machado; John J Marini; John C Marshall; John E Mazuski; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Anthony S McLean; Sangeeta Mehta; Rui P Moreno; John Myburgh; Paolo Navalesi; Osamu Nishida; Tiffany M Osborn; Anders Perner; Colleen M Plunkett; Marco Ranieri; Christa A Schorr; Maureen A Seckel; Christopher W Seymour; Lisa Shieh; Khalid A Shukri; Steven Q Simpson; Mervyn Singer; B Taylor Thompson; Sean R Townsend; Thomas Van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; W Joost Wiersinga; Janice L Zimmerman; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Severe sepsis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients*.

Authors:  Gagan Kumar; Shahryar Ahmad; Amit Taneja; Jayshil Patel; Achuta Kumar Guddati; Rahul Nanchal
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Raymund Dantes; Lauren Epstein; David J Murphy; Christopher W Seymour; Theodore J Iwashyna; Sameer S Kadri; Derek C Angus; Robert L Danner; Anthony E Fiore; John A Jernigan; Greg S Martin; Edward Septimus; David K Warren; Anita Karcz; Christina Chan; John T Menchaca; Rui Wang; Susan Gruber; Michael Klompas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven A Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Predictive Value of 3 Clinical Criteria for Sepsis (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and National Early Warning Score) With Respect to Short-term Mortality in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients With Suspected Infections.

Authors:  Margaret L Lind; Amanda I Phipps; Stephen Mooney; Catherine Liu; Alison Fohner; Kevin Patel; Masumi Ueda; Steven A Pergam
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 20.999

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative Analyses of the Impact of Different Criteria for Sepsis Diagnosis on Outcome in Patients with Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Franz-Simon Centner; Mariella Eliana Oster; Franz-Joseph Dally; Johannes Sauter-Servaes; Tanja Pelzer; Jochen Johannes Schoettler; Bianka Hahn; Anna-Meagan Fairley; Amr Abdulazim; Katharina Antonia Margarete Hackenberg; Christoph Groden; Nima Etminan; Joerg Krebs; Manfred Thiel; Holger Wenz; Máté Elod Maros
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.