| Literature DB >> 35186823 |
Dan Wang1, Hongzhen Xu1, Kexian Liu1, Jinfa Tou1, Yushuang Jia2, Wei Gao3, Xiaofei Chen1, Feixiang Luo1.
Abstract
AIM: This study aimed to explore how different dimensions of caregivers' reaction shape their caring experience, and the factors associated with different reaction patterns.Entities:
Keywords: caregiver; caregiving reaction pattern; cross-sectional study; imperforate anus; latent profile analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186823 PMCID: PMC8850696 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.796725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Measurement of CRA and PPUS.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Health | 10.74 ± 2.63 (4.00–18.00) | 2.69 ± 0.66 (1.00–4.50) |
| Finance | 8.77 ± 2.77 (3.00–15.00) | 2.92 ± 0.92 (1.00–5.00) |
| Lack of Family | 11.22 ± 3.19 (5.00–22.00) | 2.24 ± 0.64 (1.00–4.40) |
| Schedule | 18.00 ± 3.60 (5.00-−25.00) | 3.60 ± 0.71 (1.00–5.00) |
| Caregiver's Esteem | 29.01± 3.20 (20.00–35.00) | 4.14 ± 0.46 (2.86–5.00) |
| Perception of Uncertainty | 72.60 ± 14.28 (29.00–102.00) | 2.59 ± 0.51 (1.04–3.64) |
CRA, Caregivers Reaction Assessment; PPUS, Parent's Perception of Uncertainty.
Model fit indices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | −1147.088 | 2314.176 | 2316.820 | — | — | — |
| 2 | 16 | −1064.555 | 2161.109 | 2165.339 | 0.708 | 0.0002 | <0.001 |
| 3 | 22 | −1043.691 | 2131.382 | 2137.198 | 0.781 | 0.0194 | <0.001 |
| 4 | 28 | −1033.495 | 2122.990 | 2130.393 | 0.815 | 0.0892 | <0.001 |
AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; LMR, Lo-Mendell-Rubin; BLR, bootstrapped likelihood ratio.
Figure 1Dimension of caregiver reaction assessment.
Descriptive statistics for five dimensions of CRA in three classes.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health | 1.39 ± 0.38 | 2.39 ± 0.44 | 3.13 ± 0.50 |
| Finances | 1.52 ± 0.55 | 2.39 ± 0.63 | 3.63 ± 0.62 |
| Lack of family support | 1.53 ± 0.39 | 2.06 ± 0.52 | 2.51 ± 0.65 |
| Schedule | 2.27 ± 0.76 | 3.30 ± 0.57 | 4.05 ± 0.46 |
| Esteem | 4.66 ± 0.27 | 4.19 ± 0.42 | 4.04 ± 0.47 |
Class 1, low burden and high benefit, 4.8%; Class 2, moderate burden and benefit, 48.9%; Class 3, high burden and low benefit, 46.3%.
Univariate analysis of different reaction patterns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 1.079 | 0.583 | ||
| <30 | 55 | 45 | ||
| 30–40 | 58 | 48 | ||
| >40 | 10 | 13 | ||
|
| 0.125 | 0.724 | ||
| Male | 21 | 20 | ||
| Female | 102 | 86 | ||
|
| — — – | 0.127 | ||
| Married | 117 | 105 | ||
| Other | 6 | 1 | ||
|
| 2.816 | 0.421 | ||
| Primary school or below | 7 | 10 | ||
| Junior high school | 33 | 35 | ||
| High school | 25 | 20 | ||
| University/college or above | 58 | 41 | ||
|
| 16.148 | <0.01 | ||
| Part-time job | 11 | 21 | ||
| Full-time job | 59 | 25 | ||
| Unemployed | 53 | 60 | ||
|
| 0.581 | 0.446 | ||
| Mother | 98 | 80 | ||
| Father and other | 25 | 26 | ||
|
| 7.679 | 0.022 | ||
| City | 42 | 19 | ||
| Suburban | 37 | 39 | ||
| Countryside | 44 | 48 | ||
|
| 0.159 | 0.690 | ||
| Extended family | 82 | 68 | ||
| Nuclear family | 41 | 38 | ||
|
| 0.106 | 0.745 | ||
| Yes | 37 | 34 | ||
| No | 86 | 72 | ||
|
| ||||
| Age (years) | 5.123 | 0.024 | ||
| ≤ 2 | 108 | 81 | ||
| >2 | 15 | 25 | ||
|
| 0.588 | 0.443 | ||
| Male | 80 | 74 | ||
| Female | 43 | 32 | ||
| 19.335 | <0.01 | |||
| Low | 82 | 42 | ||
| Intermediate | 20 | 21 | ||
| High | 21 | 43 | ||
|
| 3.744 | 0.053 | ||
| <1 | 76 | 52 | ||
| ≥1 | 47 | 54 | ||
|
| 4.764 | 0.029 | ||
| Yes | 100 | 73 | ||
| No | 23 | 33 | ||
|
| 0.023 | 0.879 | ||
| Yes | 87 | 74 | ||
| No | 36 | 32 | ||
| Stigma | 13.68 ± 4.68 | 16.48 ± 4.55 | −4.583 | <0.01 |
| Social support | 43.40 ± 7.83 | 36.77 ± 7.52 | 6.520 | <0.01 |
| Perception of uncertainty | 67.37 ± 13.28 | 78.63 ± 12.47 | −6.615 | <0.01 |
Class 1, low burden and high benefit/moderate burden and benefit; Class 2, high burden and low benefit.
Figure 2Associated factors of different reaction patterns.