Literature DB >> 35186697

A survey of anaesthetic preferences in cataract surgery.

Moaz Hamid1, Haaris A Shiwani2, Faraz Hamid3.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify current trends in anaesthesia technique for cataract surgery and make this information available to ophthalmologists.
METHODS: An electronic survey was created and distributed to members of online ophthalmology forums; results were subsequently analysed in spreadsheet software.
RESULTS: In total there were 71 completed surveys. The most preferred anaesthesia technique in cataract cases was topical anaesthesia with intracameral injection (n=34, 47.9%), and the least preferred techniques were retrobulbar (n=1, 1.4%) and peribulbar blocks (n=1, 1.4%). The most commonly preferred local anaesthetic was lidocaine 2% (n=41, 57.7%).
CONCLUSION: Topical anaesthesia techniques with lidocaine 2% appear to be the most preferred method of anaesthesia in cataract surgery in our survey. Compared with previous literature our survey shows that topical anaesthesia is being increasingly used in cataract surgery, especially in conjunction with intracameral injection. The predominant reasons for this seem to be patient comfort and ease of technique. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaesthesia; anaesthetic preferences; cataract surgery; local anaesthetic; surgical preferences

Year:  2022        PMID: 35186697      PMCID: PMC8818464          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.02.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  14 in total

1.  New drugs and techniques for ocular anesthesia.

Authors:  K C SWAN
Journal:  Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol       Date:  1956 May-Jun

2.  Trends in Cataract Surgery Technique and Anaesthesia Preferences in Singapore: A 2016 Survey.

Authors:  Yong Seng Tam; Chandra M Kumar; Kah Guan Au Eong; Chee Chew Yip; Jason Cheng
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singap       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.473

3.  Practice patterns of Canadian ophthalmological society members in cataract surgery: 2017 survey.

Authors:  Lindsay Ong-Tone
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  The fourth New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey: 2007.

Authors:  Zelda S Pick; David V Leaming; Mark J Elder
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  A new local anesthesia technique for cataract extraction by one quadrant sub-Tenon's infiltration.

Authors:  J D Stevens
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members--2003 survey.

Authors:  David V Leaming
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  The Evolution of Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Geetha Davis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

8.  Efficacy and complication rate of 16,224 consecutive peribulbar blocks. A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  D B Davis; M R Mandel
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Comparison of clinical outcomes, patient, and surgeon satisfaction following topical versus peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Kuldeep Dole; Sucheta Kulkarni; Kavita D Shisode; Rahul Deshpande; Nilesh Kakade; Rajiv Khandekar; Madan Deshpande
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery.

Authors:  Yoshikatsu Hosoda; Shoji Kuriyama; Yoko Jingami; Hidetsugu Hattori; Hisako Hayashi; Miho Matsumoto
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  Globe penetration during loco-regional anesthesia: prevalence and review of cases.

Authors:  Alba Gómez-Benlloch; Maximiliano Olivera; Jeroni Nadal; Gemma Julio; Javier Elizalde
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 1.645

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.