| Literature DB >> 35186486 |
María Dolores Frías-Luque1, Abel Toledano-González2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It is important to know the psychological variables that are related to quality of life and well-being in healthy elderly people. The main objective of the present review is to analyse which factors, through psychological variables, are determinant on the adaptive processes that acquire relevance in the last stage of life. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search was conducted in WOS, Science Direct, PsycARTICLES, Psychology Database and Psycinfo. STUDY SELECTION: The search terms used were derived from the combination of the following search string: (("Emotional Factors" OR "Emotional Effects") AND ("Emotional Intelligence" OR "Emotional Regulation") AND ("Quality of Life" OR "Personal Satisfaction") AND ("Healthy Old People" OR "Healthy Old Adults") AND ("Healthy Aging" OR "Successful Aging")). DATA EXTRACTION: 11th April 2021. DATA SYNTHESIS: In total, 13 articles were selected.Entities:
Keywords: Emotional Intelligence; Factors; Healthy aging; Healthy old people; Quality of life; Well-being
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186486 PMCID: PMC8841035 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12900
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Search criteria.
| Limits | Studies |
|---|---|
| Chronology | Period 2010–2021 |
| Language | English and Spanish |
| Categories | Psychology, Geriatric Gerontology and Gerontology |
Criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies.
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Types of study: Descriptive studies and analytical studies (original research studies) | Studies that include only men or women solely |
| Item type: full text in English and Spanish | Studies that include elderly people with cognitive impairment or dementia |
| Variables: factors that influence emotional intelligence, emotional regulation or functioning of emotions and aspects of emotional intelligence and quality of life | Studies dealing with narrative revisions |
| Population: elderly people (more than 60 years) | Studies whose results are only preliminary |
Figure 1Flowchart of the PRISMA criteria. Source: own elaboration.
Criteria list of assessing the methodological quality of studies.
| A | Socio-demographic and medical data is described ( |
| B | Inclusion and/or exclusion criteria are formulated. |
| C | The process of data collection is described ( |
| D | The type of treatment is described. |
| E | The results are compared between two groups or more ( |
| F | Mean or median and range or standard deviation of time since diagnosis or treatment is given. |
| G | Participation and response rates for patient groups have to be described and have to be more than 75%. |
| H | Information is presented about patient/disease characteristics of responders and non-responders or if there is no selective response. |
| I | A standardized or valid quality of life or emotional experience questionnaire is used. |
| J | Results are not only described for quality of life but also for the physical, psychological and social domain. |
| K | Mean, median, standard deviations or percentages are reported for the most important outcome measures. |
| L | An attempt is made to find a set of determinants with the highest prognostic value. |
| M | Patient signed an informed consent form before study participation. |
| N | The degree of selection of the patient sample is described. |
Overview of studies on quality of life and emotional intelligence among older adults.
| Study | Study Quality | Participants | Country | Age (yrs) | Design | Instruments | Results | General Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 12/14 | 994 | USA | x̄ = 77.3 | Randomized cohorts’ study by intervention type | SF-36 | The bivariate correlations show indicators associated with the well-being of the 3 dimensions of wisdom (reflective | Subjective well-being, quality of life and adverse experience were positively associated within the reflective wisdom dimension. |
|
| 10/14 | Study 1: 550 | Scotland | n/d | Cohort’s study | WHOQOL-BREF | Significant associations were found between the 5 quality of life measures and the independent variables. Correlations ranged from −0.092 to −0.536 in study 1 and −0.060 to −0.565 in study 2, showing higher correlations between quality-of-life measures and constructs of depression, anxiety, emotional stability and quality of life. | Personality traits, especially emotional stability, and minor depressive symptoms, have a significant influence on the self-formed curriculum vitae in the development of one’s own old age. |
|
| 8/14 | 36 | Chile | n/d | Quantitative and qualitative study. | Functional Assessment Scale of Seniors | Quantitative results corroborated the qualitative results through the associations of high levels of SWL with the item accommodation and low levels of SWL with the item submission. | This research allows us to analyze the possibilities of promoting well-being in the elderly through the design of prevention and intervention strategies. The results show that a high level of subjective well-being is associated with severe losses, such as progressive blindness, and low levels are associated with milder situations, such as moving house. |
|
| 9/14 | 406 | Spain | x̄ = 74.88 | Cross-Sectional | Satisfaction with Life Scale | The results shown through the structural model analysis allowed explaining 47.4% of the variance regarding life satisfaction, being 7 of the 13 hypothesized associations significant at least at 95% (age β = 0.129 y T = 3.470; optimism β = 0.173 y T = 3.811; extraversion β = 0.191 y T = 4.467; social support β = 0.107 y T = 2.009; satisfaction with family β = 0.153 y T = 3.044; time with family β = 0.088 y T = 2.676; and satisfaction with financial resources β = 0.162 y T = 3.565). | Social relations and personality, especially optimism, were strongly related to satisfaction with life, while health status and sociodemographic characteristics were modestly associated with satisfaction with life. |
|
| 10/14 | 481 | Israel | x̄ = 77.4 | Cross-Sectional Correlational Study | CES-D | Between-group comparisons on subjective means of well-being showed significant differences in self-rated health and depressive symptoms, but not in life evaluation. | People ageing in Israel who have suffered childhood or early adulthood trauma use proactive (health) and cognitive (acceptance of the present) coping methods, regardless of their declared history during the war. |
|
| 9/14 | 89 | USA | x̄ = 64.13 | Cross-Sectional | PHQ-9 | Emotional regulation strategy was a clear predictor of memory compensation (internal mnemonic strategies R2 = 0.26). Bream mindfulness was related to 5 MCQ strategy scales (external R2 = −0.30, internal ΔR2 = 0.26 The sergeant’s mindfulness was related to 5 MCQ strategy scales (external ΔR2 = −0.30, internal ΔR2 = −0.36, recruitment ΔR2 = −0.36, time ΔR2 = −0.41 and effort ΔR2 = −0.42). Emotion regulation or attention to traits accounts for 10–14% of the variance. | HRQoL, coping strategies to regulate emotions and trait mindfulness are additional contexts that determine the degree of engagement in daily memory compensation. |
|
| 8/14 | 88 | Poland | x̄ = 69.5 | Correlational Study | PCI | Pearson’s correlation analysis of the relationship between the variables proactive coping and quality of life ( | Contributing factors are autonomous goal setting, initiative, perseverance and the perception of events in terms of opportunities for development and self-improvement, with the maintenance of activity and well-being being important in counteracting possible social stereotypes of old age and risk factors for exclusion. |
|
| 8/14 | 2034 | Germany | x̄ = 73.72 | Cohorts Study | Network Variable Questionnaire | Analysis of the associations between health and well-being domains, achieving a satisfactory overall model fit X2(41) = 75.58; CFI = 0.99; RMSEA = 0.02; SRMR = 0.02, with the fit for the health model being X2(70) = 248.94; CFI = 0 .98; RMSEA = 0.04; SRMR = 0.04. | During ageing, changes in social engagement were associated with changes in the development of interactive processes (individual resources and outcomes). These in turn modify other factors such as life satisfaction, personal autonomy, functional health, and objective health. |
|
| 12/14 | Study 1: | USA | x̄ 1 = 66.33 | Clinical Trial | NIH Examiner | Study 1: Mean composite cognitive scores were 0.225 units higher than pre-test scores ( | Exposure of older adults to a novel and intense learning environment allows for the analysis of learning abilities in psychological aspects where determining factors come into play with respect to the impact on long-term functional independence, real-world learning skills, the ability to adapt to a dynamic environment and the ability to successfully complete basic daily tasks. |
|
| 9/14 | 1006 | USA | x̄ = 74.3 | Cohorts Study | PHQ 9 | Significant differences were found between age, marital status and education level groups. | It is important to know, due to the high growth of the elderly population, which are the determining factors from the psychological variables that are associated with aspects of active and satisfactory self-perceived aging as an essential part of successful aging. |
|
| 9/14 | 815 | USA | x̄ = 73.5 | Prospective Study | Bradburn Affect Balance Scale | The results showed a correlation between well-being, self-esteem and social support scores (General Well-being Scale) comparing both groups among which a significant difference was marked between the well-being groups T(621) = 6.64; | The context can influence psychological aspects of the elderly, such as the capacity to regulate positive affect, which is greater in people who continue to live in the community, and how people with a good quality of life can determine a better emotional adaptation to fewer ideal circumstances (acceptance of the changes that occur with the passage of time). |
|
| 8/14 | 154 | Spain | x̄ = 77.44 | Cross-Sectional | HS Scale | The results revealed significant differences for all variables among participants in relation to average coping and stress | The analysis of the variables in this study have allowed us to understand how older adults who had a better adaptation presented greater success in their abilities due to high levels of happiness, life satisfaction and affective balance. |
|
| 10/14 | 309 | Germany | x̄ = 73.27 | Case-Control | Life Satisfaction Program Scale | The results show predictor values between physical functioning, perceived health and life satisfaction, with the post-test being a predictor of life satisfaction (β = −0.16, SE = 0.09; | The analysis of the effect of negative self-perception, quality of life and psychological variables during ageing and the use of self-regulation strategies in the face of the events that occur during the process play a fundamental role in the individual. Importance of health and life satisfaction in the recovery of the use of compensatory strategies to minimise the deficits that may arise at a cognitive level. |
Notes:
The second column represent “study quality”. Each item of a selected study, which met our criteria, was assigned one point. If an item did not meet our criteria, was described insufficiently, or not at all, zero points were assigned. The highest possible score was thus 14. Studies scoring 75% or more of the maximum attainable score (ie more than 10 points) were arbitrarily considered to be of “high quality”. Studies scoring between 50% and 75% were rated as moderate quality. Studies scoring lower than 50% were considered as low quality.
SF-36 (Short Form Healthy Survey 36), 3D-WS (Three Dimensional Wisdom Scale), SWB (Subjective Well-Being Scale), CES-D (Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression), WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire), IPIP (International Personality Item Pool), HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), JAMAR (North Coast Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer), LOT-R (Life Orientation Test-Revised), MOS (Mean Opinion Score), PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), MCQ (Multiple Choice Questions), ERQ (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), MAAS (Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale), PCI (Pavement Condition Index), CASP-19 (Control, Autonomy, Self-Realization and Pleasure 19), NIH Examiner (Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research), RAVLT (Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test), IADL (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale), SWLS Scale (Satisfaction With Life Scale), TIC-M (Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status), CD-RISC (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), PSS (Perceived Stress Scale), QOL-AD (Quality of Life Alzheimer’s Disease), GHQ-28 (Goldberg General Health Questionnaire), SF-12 (Short Form Healthy Survey 12), SES (Socio-Economic Status), SOC (Sense of Coherence).