| Literature DB >> 35186246 |
Caterina Casari1, Remi Favier2, Paulette Legendre1, Alexandre Kauskot1, Frederic Adam1, Veronique Picard3, Peter T Lenting1, Cecile V Denis1, Valerie Proulle4.
Abstract
This report describes the first case of splenic injury in a patient with p.V1316M-associated von Willebrand disease type 2B (VWD2B) with chronic thrombocytopenia, successfully treated with nonoperative management including von Willebrand factor (VWF) replacement therapy, and platelet transfusions relayed by a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA, Eltrombopag). Eltrombopag was initially introduced to rescue an unusual post-platelet-transfusion reaction exacerbating the thrombocytopenia. In-depth analysis of the dramatic platelet count drop and VWF measurements timeline ruled out an allo-immune reaction and supported an alternative hypothesis of a sudden platelet clearance as a consequence of stress-induced release of abnormal VWF. One year later, a second life-threatening bleeding episode required urgent surgery successfully managed with VWF replacement therapy and platelet transfusions. Eltrombopag was further introduced in the post-surgery period to allow bleeding-free and platelet-transfusion-free successful recovery. Treatment decisions are particularly challenging in patients with VWD2B, and this case highlights how such decisions can benefit from understanding the molecular origin of platelet count fluctuations observed in these patients. Here, we successfully used a new therapeutic approach combining VWF-replacement therapy and initial platelet-transfusion relayed by TPO-RA to optimize patient management. PLAIN LANGUAGEEntities:
Keywords: eltrombopag; thrombocytopenia; thrombopoietin receptor agonist; von Willebrand disease type 2B; von Willebrand factor
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186246 PMCID: PMC8855378 DOI: 10.1177/20406207221076812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Adv Hematol ISSN: 2040-6207
Patient’s laboratory evaluation and treatments.
| Days/Weeks/Months | Laboratory evaluation | Treatments | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platelets | VWF:Ag | VWF:RCo | FVIII:C | VWFpp | Hemoglobin | Replacement therapy | Platelet transfusion | TPO-RA (eltrombopag) | Tranexamic acid | |
| (×109/L) | (IU/ml) | (IU/ml) | (IU/ml) | (IU/ml) | (g/dl) | (VWF, IU) | (SPD) | (mg) | (g) | |
| First episode (splenic trauma, hemoperitoneum) | ||||||||||
| Day 1 (before treatment) | 33 | 0.65 | 0.34 | 0.76 | 1.29 | 10.1 | 2000 | |||
| Day 1 (1 h after treatment) | 60 | 1.24 | 0.70 | 1.08 | 1.15 | 8.9 | 6.2 | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 1 (12 h after treatment) | 48 | 1.06 | 0.59 | 1.1 | 1.04 | 9.8 | 2000 bid | |||
| Day 2 | 44 | 1.81 | 1.01 | 1.46 | 0.95 | 9.7 | 2000 bid | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 3 | 42 | 1.43 | 0.59 | 1.02 | 0.86 | 9.8 | 2000 bid | 6.8 + 4.2 | 3 (1 tid) | |
| Day 5 | 155 | 11.1 | 2000 bid | |||||||
| Day 5 | 105 | 1.52 | 0.75 | 1.27 | 0.82 | 2000 bid | ||||
| Day 7 | 67 | 1.60 | 0.81 | 1.13 | 0.92 | 12.4 | 2000 bid | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 9 | 56 | 1.54 | 0.53 | 1.12 | 0.87 | 11.4 | 2000 bid | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 10 (before PT) | 53 | 11.5 | 2400 qd | 3 (1 tid) | ||||||
| Day 10 (1 h after PT) | 26 | 2.24 | 1.26 | 1.75 | 3.95 | 11.5 | 8.2 | |||
| Day 10 (2 h after PT) | 12 | 11.1 | ||||||||
| Day 11 | 50 | 2.53 | 1.33 | 1.52 | 1.07 | 11.6 | 2400 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | |
| Day 12 | 57 | 12.1 | 2400 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | |||||
| Week 3 | 148 | 0.88 | 0.17 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 11.7 | 2400 tiw | 25 tiw | 3 (1 tid) | |
| Week 4 | 84 | 1.32 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 11.3 | 2400 tiw | 25 tiw | 3 (1 tid) | |
| Week 6 | 42 | 0.58 | 0.27 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 10.6 | 2400 tiw | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | |
| Week 24 | 45 | 0.52 | 0.16 | 0.67 | ||||||
| Week 35 | 21 | 0.60 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 13.4 | |||||
| Second episode (ovarian cyst rupture, intraperitoneal hemorrhage) | ||||||||||
| Day 1 (admission) | 18 | 0.52 | 0.26 | 9.4 | ||||||
| Day 1 (before surgery) | 80 | 1.06 | 0.62 | 1.33 | 7.7 | 3000 qd | 4.5 (+ 3 RBCT + 2 FFP) | |||
| Day 2 | 56 | 8 | 3000 qd | 3 (1 tid) | ||||||
| Day 2 | 84 | 2.46 | 1.74 | 1.3 | 10.7 | 3.5 | ||||
| Day 2 | 58 | 9.4 | 3 (1 tid) | |||||||
| Day 3 | 54 | 8.6 | 3000 qd | (1 RBCT) | ||||||
| Day 3 | 57 | 2.18 | 1.18 | 1.53 | 10.4 | |||||
| Day 3 | 51 | 10.7 | ||||||||
| Day 4 | 58 | 1.72 | 0.83 | 1.25 | 10.5 | 3000 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 4 | 40 | 11.5 | ||||||||
| Day 5 | 46 | 0.62 | 0.15 | 1.41 | 11.2 | 3000 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 5 | 46 | 12.1 | ||||||||
| Day 6 | 39 | 1.47 | 0.56 | 1.31 | 11.7 | 3000 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 7 | 45 | 12.7 | 3000 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | |||||
| Day 8 | 46 | 13 | 3000 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | |||||
| Day 9 | 42 | 1.26 | 0.45 | 1.05 | 13.1 | 3000 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 10 | 31 | 13.5 | 3000 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | |||||
| Day 11 | 38 | 1.06 | 0.42 | 0.99 | 12.8 | 3000 qd | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | ||
| Day 12 | 72 | 0.60 | 0.25 | 0.84 | 12.6 | 25 qd | 3 (1 tid) | |||
| Month 3 | 26 | 13.8 | ||||||||
| Month 5 | 26 | 0.52 | 0.19 | 0.58 | 12.7 | |||||
bid, twice a day; FFP, fresh frozen plasma, 1 unit; IU, International Unit; PT, platelet transfusions; qd, once a day; RBCT, red blood cells transfusion, 1 unit; tid, three times a day; tiw; three times a week; TPO-RA, thrombopoietin receptor agonist; VWF, von Willebrand factor, SPD, single platelet donor.
Blood count was performed on blood anticoagulated with EDTA on a Sysmex XN®. Von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF: Ag) and factor VIII (FVIII:C) levels were measured on citrated platelet poor plasma (PPP) using STA®-Liatest-VWF-AG, STA®-ImmunoDefVIII and STA®-CKPrest on a STAR-Max®, Stago according to manufacturer’s instructions. VWF activity (VWF: RCo) was measured on PPP using BCvonWillebrand Reagent® on a CS-5100®, Siemens according to manufacturer’s instructions. VWF pro-peptide (VWFpp) was measured using an in-house ELISA as previously described.
Figure 1.Computed tomography of the hemoperitoneum and splenic trauma: (a) hemoperitoneum seen as perisplenic blood collection (red arrow) and (b) splenic trauma seen as linear irregular hypodense area (red arrow).
Figure 2.Timeline of patient’s platelet count and von Willebrand factor antigen, activity and propeptide levels. Platelet count was measured in EDTA-anticoagulated blood on a Sysmex XN® (bars). VWF: Ag (dashed line) was measured in citrated-platelet poor plasma (PPP) using STA®-Liatest-VWF-AG® on a STAR-Max®, Stago, according to manufacturers’ instructions. VWF: RCo (dotted line) was measured in PPP using BCvonWillebrand Reagent® on a CS-5100®, Siemens, according to manufacturers’ instructions. VWFpp (solid line) was measured using an in-house ELISA as previously described. (a) Evolution of platelet count, VWF: Ag, VWF:RCo and VWFpp levels from Day 1 to Week 35 after the first bleeding episode. (b) Evolution of platelet count and VWF levels from Day 1 to Month 5 after the second bleeding episode.
Figure 3.Multimer profile of patient’s von Willebrand factor after the first bleeding episode. (a) The multimeric profile of VWF was analyzed in citrated-platelet poor plasma in 2% agarose gel essentially as previously described using an in-house alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human VWF polyclonal antibody. Pictures were acquired using a G:BOX Chemi XT16 Image Systems and a Gene Tools version 4.0.0.0 (Syngene) software. The solid line separates two gels. The dashed line indicates VWF high molecular weight multimers (HMWMs). Arrowheads indicate satellite bands, such as VWF fragments derived from ADAMTS13-mediated proteolysis. (b) Profiles plots of multimers shown in (a). Multimer plots have been generated with ImageJ 2.1.0 software using the Gel Analyzer tool.
NPP, normal pooled plasma.