| Literature DB >> 35186230 |
Qingna Lv1, Yanyun Zhang2, Yanyan Li3, Yang Yu1.
Abstract
While nursing courses provide a convenient and quick way to learn, they can also be overloaded with resources that can cause learners to become cognitively disoriented or have difficulty choosing nursing course. This paper proposes to fully explore learners' interests in the case of sparse data by fusing knowledge graph technology and deep recommendation models and adopt knowledge graph to model nursing courses at the semantic level so as to correspond the set of nursing courses to the knowledge graph and solve the problem of lack of logical knowledge relationships. Due to the specificity of its positions, the nursing profession must accurately position the nursing professional curriculum standards in the process of determining the talent cultivation model based on the nursing professional positions and the admission requirements for nursing practice qualification. Through linear feature mining based on the knowledge graph, entities and relationships are used to intuitively display the interest paths of nursing professional learners and enhance the interpretability of recommendations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186230 PMCID: PMC8849811 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3826413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Knowledge graph technology system.
Figure 2Flowchart of Wikipedia-assisted alignment.
Table of knowledge graph relationship categories.
| Relationship type | Relational meaning | Triples example |
|---|---|---|
| Inclusion relation | Relationship between whole and part | Baseadapter, category android adapter |
| Belonging relationship | Relationship between part and whole | Android adapter, category zh, baseadapter |
| Application relationship | Relationship between technology and application | CSS technology, usage, website development |
| Development relationship | Relationship between technology and developers | Baidu map, developer, Baidu |
| Reference relation | Relationships other than the above relationships | Impress. js, Language JavaScript |
Figure 3Network diagram of nursing course subword entities.
Figure 4Combined knowledge graph and coreality body network graph G + Co.
Comparison table of experimental results with the benchmark algorithm.
| Model | AUC | ACC | Best_epoch |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCF | 0.8817 (−0.37%) | 0.8017 (−0.32%) | 2.4 |
| RippleNet | 0.8822 (−0.32%) | 0.8012 (−0.39%) | 7.8 |
| NFM | 0.8444 (−4.1%) | 0.7689 (−3.62%) | 144.1 |
| Ripple_mlp | 0.8854 | 0.8051 | 1 |
| Ripple_mlp+ | 0.8907 (+0.53%) | 0.8110 (+0.59%) | 1 |
Figure 5Variation of model AUC with the value of (d) num_factor setting.
Effect of the number of water wave layers k on the experimental results.
|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model AUC | 0.8638 | 0.8644 | 0.8651 | 0.8645 |
Four datasets sampled with different levels of sparsity.
| Data set | Total interactions | Average number of interactions | Sparsity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sparse data set | 163527 | 32 | 96.51 |
| Sparse dataset | 209494 | 41 | 95.53 |
| Dense data set | 286025 | 57 | 93.89 |
| Dense data set | 521750 | 104 | 88.86 |
Figure 6Effect of datasets with different sparsity on model's performance.
Figure 7Distribution of nursing students' course learning outcomes.
Figure 8Classification of professional nursing vocabulary.