| Literature DB >> 35186117 |
Chunying Yu1, Yani Che2, Guifang Sun3, Xipeng Zhao4, Bin Liu3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of a multi-image source 3D modeling imaging examination system on the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases in cardiac surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186117 PMCID: PMC8849969 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9123332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Execution process of multi-image source inspection.
Figure 2Data flow diagram of multi-image source cardiac surgery examination results of 3D modeling big data analysis.
Figure 3Upgrade target of the hospital diagnosis and treatment big data system for cardiovascular imaging examination in cardiac surgery.
Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of two inspection modes.
| Comparison items | Sensitivity | Specificity | Reliability | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aortic dissection | Multiple image sources | 91.60% | 87.78% | 92.54% |
| Separate image source | 69.85% | 66.67% | 71.37% | |
|
| 3.187 | 2.274 | 3.157 | |
|
| 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.004 | |
|
| ||||
| Aortic atherosclerosis | Multiple image sources | 93.83% | 94.44% | 95.27% |
| Separate image source | 87.41% | 89.29% | 88.62% | |
|
| 6.501 | 5.498 | 5.826 | |
|
| 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.006 | |
|
| ||||
| Heart valve murmur | Multiple image sources | 95.02% | 95.60% | 95.42% |
| Separate image source | 89.59% | 91.22% | 90.54% | |
|
| 7.415 | 9.056 | 8.275 | |
|
| 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.007 | |
Figure 4Sensitivity distribution under different course conditions.
Comparison of doctors' subjective evaluation related to the study.
| Comparison items | Cardiac surgeon | Imaging doctor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic difficulty | System ease of use | Diagnostic difficulty | System ease of use | |
| Multiple image sources | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 8.2 ± 1.8 | 4.5 ± 0.6 | 8.4 ± 1.5 |
| Separate image sources | 6.4 ± 0.5 | 7.8 ± 0.7 | 7.2 ± 1.3 | 7.5 ± 1.1 |
|
| 4.225 | 3.179 | 2.053 | 3.862 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Investigation and deduction results of clinical efficiency and patient satisfaction (n = 680).
| Comparison items | Clinical effective rate | Surgical accident rate | Nursing satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiple image sources | 654 (96.2) | 11 (1.6) | 632 (92.9) |
| Separate image sources | 593 (87.2) | 17 (2.5) | 554 (81.5) |
|
| 3.551 | 2.194 | 2.983 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.006 |