| Literature DB >> 35186102 |
Qian Chen1, Ya-Li Zhang1, Zi-Wei Zhang1, Yu-Jun Chen1, Ying-Jue Tang1, Dan Qiao1,2, Yan-Cheng Dai1,2, Zhi-Peng Tang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Excessive endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) may lead to impaired intestinal mucosal barrier function and then participate in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). Jianpi Qingchang decoction (JPQCD) has been shown to have protective effects on UC. However, further studies are needed to determine whether JPQCD regulates PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP pathways to play a role in treating UC.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186102 PMCID: PMC8849791 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7378807
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Disease activity index score.
| Weight loss(%) | Stool consistency | Bleeding | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Normal pellets | Normal | 0 |
| 1∼5 | Loose feces | Occult blood positive | 1 |
| 6∼10 | 2 | ||
| 11∼15 | Watery diarrhea | Visible bleeding | 3 |
| >16 | 4 |
List of primers used in this study.
| Gene | Primer sequence | |
|---|---|---|
| GRP78 | Forward | TTGTCCCCTTACACTTGGTATTG |
| Reverse | TGTCTTTTGTTAGGGGTCGTTC | |
| PERK | Forward | GCTCAAAGACGAAAGCACAGAC |
| Reverse | CCCACCGAGAAAGACCGAC | |
| eIF2 | Forward | ACCTGGATACGGTGCCTACG |
| Reverse | TCGAATTTTGACCGCTTGTG | |
| ATF4 | Forward | ATGGAGCAAAACAAGACAGCA |
| Reverse | TGCCTTACGGACCTCTTCTATC | |
| CHOP | Forward | AAACCTTCACTACTCTTGACCCTG |
| Reverse | GGGCACTGACCACTCTGTTTC | |
|
| Forward | GAGACCTTCAACACCCCAGC |
| Reverse | ATGTCACGCACGATTTCCC | |
Identification results of main components of JPQCD.
| NO | Retention time (min) | Adducts | Measured M/Z | Expected M/Z | ppm | Formula | Molecular weight | Phytochemical name | MS/MS spectra |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.81 | [M-H]− | 169.0158 | 169.0142 | 9.2 | C7H6O5 | 170.02 | Gallic acid | 169.0168; 125.0250; 81.0368 |
| 2 | 5.29 | [M-H]− | 345.0832 | 345.0827 | 1.4 | C14H18O10 | 346.09 | Methyl 6-O-galloyl- | 345.0814; 313.0536; 124.0170 |
| 3 | 9.15 | [M-H]− | 289.0737 | 289.0718 | 6.7 | C15H14O6 | 290.08 | Catechin | 289.0721; 271.0594; 245.0833; 203.0725; 151.0401 |
| 4 | 11.26 | [M-H]− | 277.0034 | 277.0024 | 3.7 | C9H10O8S | 278.01 | Gallic acid ethyl ester sulfate | 277.0032; 197.0455; 182.0225; 166.9997; 123.0086 |
| 5 | 12.54 | [M-H]− | 289.0735 | 289.0718 | 6.0 | C15H14O6 | 290.08 | Epicatechin | 289.0737; 245.0844; 203.0715; 151.0419 |
| 6 | 18.78 | [M + FA-H]− | 511.2434 | 511.2396 | 7.4 | C21H38O11 | 466.24 | Rhodioloside E | 511.2700; 465.2368; 333.1949; 311.0997; 251.0743 |
| 7 | 20.40 | [M-H]− | 417.1220 | 417.1191 | 6.9 | C21H22O9 | 418.13 | Liquiritin | 417.1190; 255.0670; 135.0101; 119.0510 |
| 8 | 20.41 | [M + H]+ | 447.1256 | 447.1286 | -6.7 | C22H22O10 | 446.12 | Calycosin-7-O- | 285.0746; 270.0507 |
| 9 | 21.52 | [M-H]− | 619.2303 | 619.2244 | 9.6 | C27H40O16 | 620.23 | Dactylorhin E | 619.2267; 439.1630; 171.0665; 153.0568 |
| 10 | 21.57 | [M-H]− | 549.1631 | 549.1614 | 3.2 | C26H30O13 | 550.17 | Liquiritin apioside | 549.1600; 255.0650; 135.0084 |
| 11 | 22.16 | [M + H]+ | 504.1466 | 504.15 | -6.8 | C24H25NO11 | 503.14 | Oleracein A | 342.0961; 147.0431; 85.0268 |
| 12 | 24.67 | [M + H]+ | 534.159 | 534.1606 | -3 | C25H27NO12 | 533.15 | Oleracein B | 372.1090; 177.0529; 145.0260 |
| 13 | 27.62 | [M-H]− | 457.1737 | 457.1715 | 4.7 | C21H30O11 | 458.18 | Gymnoside II | 457.1745; 285.0957; 189.0746; 171.0664; 153.0556 |
| 14 | 28.37 | [M-H]− | 457.1753 | 457.1715 | 8.2 | C21H30O11 | 458.18 | Gymnoside I | 457.1737; 285.0976; 153.0576; 127.0770 |
| 15 | 28.55 | M+ | 320.0897 | 320.0917 | −6.4 | C19H14NO4 | 320.09 | Coptisine | 320.0907; 292.0961; 277.0757; 249.0733 |
| 16 | 28.76 | [M + FA-H]− | 933.3300 | 933.3245 | 5.9 | C40H56O22 | 888.33 | Dactylorhin A | 887.3237; 619.2214; 439.1595; 179.0563 |
| 17 | 29.04 | M+ | 338.1364 | 338.1387 | -6.8 | C20H20NO4 | 338.14 | Jatrorrhizine | 338.1386; 322.1051; 208.0897; 294.1110; 279.0878 |
| 18 | 29.22 | [M + FA-H]− | 441.1797 | 441.1766 | 7.0 | C20H28O8 | 396.18 | Lobetyolin | 305.1232; 215.1090; 185.0984; 159.0830; 143.0720 |
| 19 | 30.81 | [M + FA-H]− | 475.1273 | 475.1246 | 5.7 | C22H22O9 | 430.13 | Ononin | 267.0671; 252.0399; 223.0389 |
| 20 | 30.96 | [M-H]− | 549.1657 | 549.1614 | 7.9 | C26H30O13 | 550.17 | Isoliquiritin apioside | 549.1654; 255.0655; 135.0104 |
| 21 | 31.72 | [M + FA-H]− | 977.5402 | 977.5327 | 7.7 | C47H80O18 | 932.53 | Notoginsenoside R1 | 977.5391; 931.5254; 799.4847; 637.4346 |
| 22 | 32.16 | [M + H]+ | 314.1388 | 314.1387 | 0.4 | C18H19NO4 | 313.13 | N-trans-Feruloyltyramine | 314.1417; 177.0538; 145.0276; 121.0637 |
| 23 | 32.34 | M+ | 352.1528 | 352.1543 | -4.4 | C21H22NO4 | 352.15 | Palmatine | 352.1538; 336.1192; 322.1032; 308.1216; 294.1076 |
| 24 | 32.44 | M+ | 336.1216 | 336.1230 | -4.3 | C20H18NO4 | 336.13 | Berberine | 336.1213; 320.0906; 292.0947; 276.1035 |
| 25 | 32.69 | [M + FA-H]− | 771.2747 | 771.2717 | 3.9 | C34H46O17 | 726.27 | Militarine | 725.2715; 457.1722; 285.0982; 153.0566 |
| 26 | 32.83 | [M + FA-H]− | 845.4934 | 845.4904 | 3.5 | C42H72O14 | 800.49 | Ginsenoside Rg1 | 845.4965; 799.4888; 637.4343; 475.3814 |
| 27 | 33.16 | [M-H]− | 408.9890 | 408.9871 | 4.6 | C16H10O11S | 409.99 | 3,3′-Di-O-methylellagic acid sulfate | 329.0298; 314.0055; 298.9820; 286.0127 |
| 28 | 34.34 | [M + FA-H]− | 493.2308 | 493.2291 | 3.5 | C21H36O10 | 448.23 | Geraniol 1-O- | 493.2369; 447.2270; 315.1806; 221.0679; 179.0579 |
| 29 | 35.30 | [M-H]− | 423.0051 | 423.0028 | 5.5 | C17H12O11S | 424.01 | 2,3,8-Tri-O-methylellagic acid sulfate | 423.0065; 343.0475; 328.0216; 312.9979; 297.9731 |
| 30 | 38.58 | [M-H]− | 983.4580 | 983.4493 | 8.8 | C48H72O21 | 984.46 | Licorice saponin A3 | 983.4449; 821.3791 |
| 31 | 39.35 | [M + FA-H]− | 815.4855 | 815.4798 | 6.9 | C41H70O13 | 770.48 | Ginsenoside F3 | 815.4920; 769.4752; 637.4285; 475.3756 |
| 32 | 39.79 | [M-H]− | 837.3954 | 837.3914 | 4.7 | C42H62O17 | 838.40 | Licoricesaponin G2 | 837.3894; 351.0538; 193.0391 |
| 33 | 40.40 | [M + FA-H]− | 683.4427 | 683.4376 | 7.5 | C36H62O9 | 638.44 | Ginsenoside Rh1 | 683.4435; 637.4295; 475.3811 |
| 34 | 40.50 | [M + FA-H]− | 1153.6127 | 1153.6011 | 10.0 | C54H92O23 | 1108.60 | Ginsenoside Rb1 | 1153.6143; 1107.5910; 945.5482 |
| 35 | 40.62 | [M + FA-H]− | 811.4566 | 811.4485 | 9.9 | C41H66O13 | 766.45 | Ziyuglycoside I | 811.4522; 765.4467; 603.3907; 207.0512 |
| 36 | 40.88 | [M + FA-H]− | 683.4404 | 683.4376 | 4.1 | C36H62O9 | 638.44 | Ginsenoside F1 | 683.4427; 637.4368; 475.3848 |
| 37 | 41.46 | [M-H]− | 837.3983 | 837.3914 | 8.2 | C42H62O17 | 838.40 | Licoricesaponin Q2 | 837.3965; 351.0573 |
| 38 | 41.99 | [M + FA-H]− | 829.4671 | 829.4591 | 9.6 | C41H68O14 | 784.46 | Astragaloside A | 829.4714; 783.4561; 489.3715 |
| 39 | 42.95 | [M + FA-H]− | 991.5574 | 991.5483 | 9.2 | C48H82O18 | 946.55 | Ginsenoside Rd | 991.5596; 945.5476; 783.5021; 621.4569 |
| 40 | 43.09 | [M-H]− | 821.4006 | 821.3965 | 5.0 | C42H62O16 | 822.40 | Glycyrrhizic acid | 821.3926; 351.0580 |
| 41 | 44.57 | [M-H]− | 821.4037 | 821.3965 | 8.8 | C42H62O16 | 822.40 | Uralsaponin B | 821.3966; 351.0582 |
| 42 | 49.14 | [M + FA-H]− | 829.5022 | 829.4955 | 8.1 | C42H72O13 | 784.50 | Ginsenoside Rg3 | 829.5000; 783.4923; 621.4401 |
| 43 | 50.43 | [M + H] + | 231.1365 | 231.138 | -6.3 | C15H18O2 | 232.15 | Dehydrocostus Lactone | 231.1381; 185.1323; 165.0682; 128.0604; 105.0691 |
| 44 | 50.78 | [M-H]− | 231.1411 | 231.1391 | 8.9 | C15H20O2 | 232.15 | Costunolide | 231.1407; 213.1291 |
Figure 1UPLC-Q-TOF/MS of JPQCD. (a) UPLC-HRMS base peak ion flow graph (BPC) negative ion mode for JPQCD; (b) UPLC-HRMS BPC-positive ion mode for JPQCD; (c) UPLC UV xhromatogram of JPQCD-UV 254 nm.
Figure 2JPQCD can improve the symptoms of experimental chronic colitis in IL-10−/− mice: (a) animal experiment design. IL-10−/− mice were induced by piroxicam for 10 days. Wild-type/control group/model group and JPQCD group were given normal saline or JPQCD daily. n = 6–8. (b) The body weight was measured every day. (c) Schematic diagram of disease activity index score and fecal occult blood test. (d) Colon length and statistics. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Compared to the model group, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001.
Figure 3Histologic images of mice colon (H&E, magnification ×100). (a) Wild-type group; (b) the control group; (c) model group; (d) low-dose JPQCD group; (e) middle-dose JPQCD group; (f) high-dose JPQCD group. The arrow represents the infiltration of inflammatory cells.
Figure 4Transmission electron microscopy of mouse intestinal epithelial cells (magnification ×6000). (a) Wild-type group; (b) the control group; (c) model group; (d) low-dose JPQCD group; (e) middle-dose JPQCD group; (f) high-dose JPQCD group. Nu: nucleus; Mi: mitochondrial; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; rER: rough endoplasmic reticulum; Mv: microvillus.
Figure 5Effects of Jianpi Qingchang decoction (JPQCD) on the expression of GRP78, PERK, eIF2α, ATF4, and CHOP mRNA by RT-PCR in piroxicam-induced colitis IL-10−/− mice. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Compared to the model group, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001.
Figure 6(a) Effects of Jianpi Qingchang decoction (JPQCD) on the expression of PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP pathway proteins assessed by western blot in piroxicam-induced colitis IL-10−/− mice. (b-f) Densitometric analysis was performed to determine each protein. β-Actin was used as the loading control. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Compared to the model group, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001. (g) Immunofluorescence staining for CHOP in colon tissues (magnification ×100).
Figure 7(a-b) Western blotting of NF-κB, p-NF-κB p65 in colon tissue. (c) Detection of IL-17 content in colon tissue by ELISA. (d) The mRNA levels of NF-κB and IL-17 in colon tissue. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Compared to the model group, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001.
Figure 8Schematic diagram of endoplasmic reticulum stress mechanism of Jianpi Qingchang decoction (JPQCD) in the process of improving piroxicam-induced chronic colitis in IL-10−/− mice. (Plant illustrations originate from the Internet.)