| Literature DB >> 35186056 |
Bin Liu1, Pengxiang Gao1, Shuoxin Zhang1.
Abstract
Agroforestry system is regarded as a promising practice in sustainable agricultural management. However, the effects of long-term tree-based intercropping on crop remain poorly understood, especially in the Loess Plateau (China). In this study, the impacts of photosynthetic and respiration rate were determined by the portable photosynthesis system (Li-6400), and the effects of the root growth dynamics of soybean in the walnut-soybean intercropping system were measured by soil auger and WinRHIZO root analysis system, in the Loess Plateau. The results showed that soybean reached the highest net photosynthetic rate during flowering period, with the net photosynthetic rate of intercropped soybean, which was 20.40 μmol·m-2·s-1, significantly higher than that of its monocropped counterpart. Soybean biomass reached the maximum during the pod-bearing period, with intercropped soybean biomass being 25.49 g, significantly higher than that of its monocropped counterpart. The mean diameter and increased density of soybean fine roots reduced along with increased soil depth. Both the diameter (0.43 mm) and increased density (930 cm/dm3) of intercropped soybean fine roots were evidently higher than those of monocropped soybean (0.35 mm, 780 cm/dm3). With increasing cropping years, fine roots of intercropped soybean tended to be mainly distributed in soil at a depth between 0 and 20 cm from the fifth year. Collectively, compared with soybean monoculture, walnut-soybean agroforestry system is more conducive to soybean growth in the Loess Plateau.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35186056 PMCID: PMC8853768 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2246824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Schematic diagram of sampling points.
The photosynthetic factors of soybean.
| Measurement | Transpiration rate (m mol·m−2·s−1) | Net photosynthesis rate ( | Stomatal conductance (mol m−2·s−1) | Intercellular CO2 concentration( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branching | CK | 1.43 a | 12.94 a | 155.18 a | 106.94 a |
| T | 1.29 ab | 14.94 a | 172.24 a | 93.31 a | |
|
| |||||
| Flowering | CK | 4.29 a | 16.93 a | 187.40 a | 195.44 a |
| T | 3.43 b | 20.40 b | 212.36 b | 188.14 ab | |
|
| |||||
| Podding | CK | 2.92 a | 15.63 a | 178.26 a | 263.72 a |
| T | 2.29 ab | 16.31 ab | 189.31 a | 213.24 b | |
The data in the table are the mean value of different treatments. The letter after data expression Duncan's multiple comparison results. Those data in the same column with the same letter indicate that there is no significant difference (P > 0.05). T denotes walnut-soybean; CK denotes soybean.
The biomass of soybean.
| Measurement | Fresh weight of single plant (g) | Dry weight of above ground (g) | Dry weight of under ground (g) | Dry weight of single plant (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branching | CK | 10.43 a | 2.18 a | 0.70 a | 2.83 a |
| T | 10.49 a | 2.20 a | 0.71 a | 2.94 a | |
|
| |||||
| Flowering | CK | 26.16 a | 4.73 a | 1.17 a | 5.90 a |
| T | 29.72 ab | 5.02 ab | 1.67 b | 6.68ab | |
|
| |||||
| Podding | CK | 65.09a | 16.14 a | 5.24a | 21.39a |
| T | 74.76 ab | 18.65 b | 6.83 b | 25.49 b | |
The data in the table are the mean value of different treatments. The letter after data expresses Duncan's multiple comparison results. Those data in the same column with the same letter indicate that there is no significant difference (P > 0.05). T denotes walnut-soybean; CK denotes soybean.
The competition between the root of walnut and soybean in agroforestry system.
| Soil depth | 0–20 cm | 20–40 cm | 40–60 cm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Root density walnut | 75.632 ± 0.515 | 40.735 ± 0.273 | 17.256 ± 0.209 |
| Soybean (cm/dm3) | 4317.235 ± 2.749 | 694.317 ± 1.416 | 601.403 ± 1.037 |
| Competition intensity index | 0.637 ± 0.026A | 0.386 ± 0.033B | 0.215 ± 0.013C |
The data in the table are the mean value of different treatments. The letter after data expresses Duncan's multiple comparison results. Those data in the same column with a different letter indicate that there is a significant difference (P < 0.05).
Figure 2The relative soil moisture content in different soil layers. The same asterisk indicates a significant influence, P < 0.05.
Figure 3The relative density of increased root of soybean in different soil layers.
Figure 4The relative density of soybean root in different soil layers.
Figure 5The relative average diameter of fine root of the soybean in different soil layers. The same asterisk indicates a significant influence, P < 0.05.