| Literature DB >> 35185846 |
Zhengbin Yang1,2,3, Yuedan Hu1,2,3, Jiangli Wu1,2,3, Jingui Liu1,2,3, Furong Zhang1,2,3, Hongya Ao1,2,3, Yong Zhu1,2,3, Laping He1,2,3, Wei Zhang4, Xuefeng Zeng1,2,3.
Abstract
Yellow slurry water is a kind of nutrient-rich wastewater of tofu. Firstly, the medium of yellow slurry was optimized. Then, APP40, APP60, and APP80 were obtained by sedimentation with different concentration of ethanol (40, 60, and 80%). The physicochemical properties and primary structures of the three polysaccharides were studied by high performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC), high performance gel filtration chromatography (HPGFC), scanning electron microscope (SEM), atomic force microscope (AFM), and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer. Finally, the effects of three polysaccharides on antioxidation activity were studied. According to the experimental optimization the results, the biomass and the production of Auricularia polytricha Polysaccharides (APPS) reached the peak, and they were 13.5 ± .655 and 9.42 ± .253 g/L (p < .05). The SEM and the AFM showed that the height of APP80 gradually increased from 31.1 to 46.7 nm and from APP40 to APP80. The particle size of APP80 increased, the pores decrease or even disappear, and the molecules begin to aggregate. The FT-IR spectrum analysis showed that the three polysaccharides possessed key functional groups. The carbohydrate content of APP40, APP60, and APP80 was 20.2, 34.25, and 31.73%. The molecular weights of APP40, APP60, and APP80 are 9.462 × 104, 8.742 × 104, and 8.091 × 104 Da, respectively. The three polysaccharides were composed of rhamnose, galactose, glucose, mannose, and xylose but with different molar ratio. APP80 showed strong reducing ability and scavenging activity of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and hydroxyl radicals through antioxidant activities evaluated in vitro. This study introduces a way for the effective use of yellow slurry water.Entities:
Keywords: Auricularia polytricha; antioxidant activity; polysaccharides; structure; yellow slurry water
Year: 2022 PMID: 35185846 PMCID: PMC8851468 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.811275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
HPLC mobile phase conditions.
| Water (%) | 250 mM NaOH (%) | 1 M NaAc (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 min | 98 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 21 min | 98 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 21.1 min | 93 | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| 30 min | 78 | 2.0 | 20 |
| 30.1 min | 20 | 80 | 0 |
| 50 min | 20 | 80 | 0 |
Figure 1Effects of culture conditions on Auricularia polytricha Polysaccharides (APPS) and biomass production. (A) The effect of fermentation time on the production of APPS; (B) optimization of fermentation temperature (pH 5 and initial inoculum of 10%); (C) optimization of fermentation temperature (pH 5 and initial inoculum of 10%); and (D) optimization of fermentation initial inoculum (pH 7 and temperature of 26°C).
Figure 2Effects of different carbon sources and nitrogen sources and inorganic saltson APPS and biomass production by AP–10 fermentation and time distribution of yellow slurry water fermentation system. (A). Optimization of fermentation carbon sources (pH 7, the nitrogen source was 3 g/L peptone, the inorganic saltson was a mixture of 2.5 g/L KH2PO4, and 1 g/L MgSO4 for 3 days); (B) optimization of fermentation glucose concentration; (C) optimization of fermentation nitrogen sources (the carbon source was 40 g/L glucose); (D) optimization of fermentation peptone concentration; and (E,F) optimization of fermentation for the amount of inorganic saltson added.
Figure 3Time distribution of yellow slurry water fermentation system.
Characterization and composition of the polysaccharides.
| Item | APP40 | APP60 | APP80 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrate (%) | 20.2 ± .23c | 34.25 ± .15a | 31.73 ± .25b |
| Protein (%) | 4.49 ± .33a | 2.18 ± .22b | 2.37 ± .47b |
| Yield (%) | 1.43c | 2.25b | 5.74a |
| Mw × 104(Da) | 9.462 | 8.742 | 8.091 |
| Mn × 104(Da) | 6.687 | 6.0798 | 5.367 |
| Mw/Mn | 1.41 | 1.43 | 1.51 |
| ζ–potential(mV) | −13.06a | 9.63b | 4.23c |
|
| |||
| Rhamnose | 10.75 | 8.94 | 6.65 |
| Galactose | 47.24 | 45.19 | 46.14 |
| Glucose | 13.34 | 38.89 | 39.84 |
| Xylose | 3.53 | — | — |
| Mannose | 25.14 | 6.98 | 7.37 |
Values represent mean ± SD, and superscripts a–c differ significantly (p < .05) among APPS.
Figure 4Determination of monosaccharides by HPLC using the pulsed amperometric detector (PAD) detector: (A) standard chromatogram of monosaccharide mix contains fucose (1), arabinose (2), rhamnose (3), galactose (4), glucose (5), xylose(6), mannose (7), and fructose (8); (B) determination of monosaccharides in APP40; (C) determination of monosaccharides in APP60; and (D) Determination of monosaccharides in APP80.
Figure 5Molecular weight of the three polysaccharides. (A) APP40; (B) APP60; and (C) APP80.
Figure 6The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) analysis of precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 40% (APP40), precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 60% (APP60), and precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 80% (APP80).
Figure 7Scanning electron micrograph of precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 40% (APP40), precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 60% (APP60), and precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 80% (APP80).
Figure 8Atomic force micrograph of precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 40% (APP40), precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 60% (APP60), and precipitated at the ethanol concentration of 80% (APP80).
Figure 9Antioxidant activity of polysaccharides. (A) DPPH radical scavenging activity; (B) hydroxyl radical scavenging activity; and (C) reducing power.