| Literature DB >> 35185753 |
Wanying Shan1, Liang Xu2, Yuan Xu1, Zhuoyin Qiu1, Jie Feng1, Jie Zhao3, Jingwen Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: PSCI; leukoaraiosis; mediation analysis; stroke; white blood cell
Year: 2022 PMID: 35185753 PMCID: PMC8852802 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.793435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Baseline data stratified by patients with and without PSCI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 66.5 ± 9.1 | 68.6 ± 8.3 | 64.4 ± 9.4 | 0.001 |
| Male, | 151 (54.7) | 70 (51.1) | 81 (58.3) | 0.231 |
| Education years <12, | 174 (63.0) | 99 (72.3) | 75 (54.0) | 0.002 |
| Risk factors, | ||||
| Hypertension | 183 (66.3) | 96 (70.1) | 52 (62.6) | 0.189 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 77 (27.9) | 52 (38.0) | 25 (18.0) | 0.001 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 41 (14.9) | 21 (15.3) | 20 (14.4) | 0.826 |
| Coronary heart disease | 34 (12.3) | 17 (12.4) | 17 (12.2) | 0.964 |
| Current smoker | 102 (37.0) | 50 (36.5) | 52 (37.4) | 0.875 |
| Clinical data | ||||
| Time from onset to | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) | 0.102 |
| Systolic blood pressure, | 138.3 ± 16.8 | 138.1 ± 15.9 | 138.5 ± 17.6 | 0.840 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, | 80.8 ± 10.3 | 80.8 ± 9.5 | 80.7 ± 10.9 | 0.891 |
| Baseline NIHSS, score | 5.0 (3.0, 8.0) | 5.0 (3.0, 8.0) | 5.0 (2.0, 7.0) | 0.008 |
| DWI-ASPECTS 0–7, | 122 (46.9) | 68 (53.2) | 54 (41.5) | 0.082 |
| Leukoaraiosis, | 115 (41.7) | 68 (49.6) | 47 (33.8) | 0.008 |
| Stroke etiology, | 0.561 | |||
| Large-artery disease | 120 (43.5) | 55 (40.1) | 65 (46.8) | |
| Small-artery disease | 77 (27.9) | 31 (22.6) | 23 (16.5) | |
| Cardioembolic stroke | 54 (19.6) | 38 (27.7) | 39 (28.1) | |
| Others and undetermined | 25 (9.1) | 13 (9.5) | 12 (8.6) | |
| Laboratory data | ||||
| Platelet count, 109/L | 206.7 ± 74.5 | 205.0 ± 64.5 | 208.3 ± 83.4 | 0.717 |
| Homocysteine, mmol/L | 14.2 ± 6.1 | 14.1 ± 6.6 | 14.4 ± 5.1 | 0.690 |
| Hs-CRP, mg/L | 5.8 (2.8, 10.0) | 7.6 (3.3, 10.5) | 5.2 (2.4, 9.7) | 0.001 |
| Fasting blood-glucose, | 5.9 ± 2.5 | 6.1 ± 2.6 | 5.8 ± 2.5 | 0.366 |
| Uric acid, umol/l | 309.6 ± 103.6 | 323.3 ± 113.2 | 296.2 ± 91.7 | 0.031 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 1.2 | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 0.438 |
| Triglyceride, mmol/L | 1.4 (1.0, 1.8) | 1.4 (1.0, 1.8) | 1.3 (1.3, 1.8) | 0.738 |
| Low density lipoprotein, | 2.4 (2.0, 2.9) | 2.4 (1.9, 2.9) | 2.3 (2.0, 3.1) | 0.515 |
| High density lipoprotein, | 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) | 1.1 (0.9, 1.2) | 1.0 (0.8, 1.2) | 0.469 |
| Total WBC count, 109/L | 6.6 ± 2.0 | 7.1 ± 2.2 | 6.1 ± 1.6 | 0.001 |
| Total WBC count quartile | 0.003 | |||
| First quartile | 69 (25.0) | 24 (17.5) | 45 (32.4) | |
| Second quartile | 71 (25.7) | 33 (24.1) | 38 (27.3) | |
| Third quartile | 68 (24.6) | 35 (25.5) | 33 (23.7) | |
| Fourth quartile | 68 (24.6) | 45 (32.8) | 23 (16.5) | |
DWI-ASPECTS, DWI based alberta stroke program early CT score; Hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LA, leukoaraiosis; NIHSS, national institutes of health stroke scale; PSCI, post-stroke cognitive impairment; WBC, white blood cell.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the association between total WBC count and leukoaraiosis.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total WBC count, per SD increase | 1.55 (1.21–1.99) | 0.001 | 1.51 (1.18–1.94) | 0.001 | 1.39 (1.06–1.82) | 0.017 |
| Total WBC count | ||||||
| First quartile | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Second quartile | 0.95 (0.48–1.91) | 0.900 | 0.94 (0.47–1.89) | 0.871 | 0.81 (0.38–1.69) | 0.570 |
| Third quartile | 0.96 (0.48–1.93) | 0.909 | 0.93 (0.46–1.90) | 0.851 | 0.75 (0.34–1.62) | 0.464 |
| Fourth quartile | 2.67 (1.34–5.33) | 0.005 | 2.41 (1.20–4.87) | 0.014 | 2.00 (1.03–4.20) | 0.046 |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; WBC, white blood cell.
Model 1: adjusted for age and sex.
Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, education years, diabetes mellitus, baseline NIHSS score, DWI-ASPECTS 0–7, uric acid and Hs- CRP level.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the association between total WBC count and PSCI.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total WBC count, per SD increase | 1.62 (1.25–2.10) | <0.001 | 1.57 (1.20–2.05) | 0.001 | 1.51 (1.12–2.04) | 0.006 |
| Total WBC count | ||||||
| First quartile | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Second quartile | 1.63 (0.83–3.22) | 0.160 | 1.71 (0.85–3.49) | 0.135 | 1.60 (0.75–3.43) | 0.226 |
| Third quartile | 1.99 (1.00–3.95) | 0.050 | 2.25 (1.09–4.63) | 0.029 | 2.16 (0.93–4.78) | 0.059 |
| Fourth quartile | 3.67 (1.81–7.43) | <0.001 | 3.29 (1.57–6.92) | 0.002 | 2.49 (1.11–5.56) | 0.026 |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PSCI, post-stroke cognitive impairment; WBC, white blood cell.
Model 1: adjusted for age and sex.
Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, education years, diabetes mellitus, baseline NIHSS score, DWI-ASPECTS 0–7, uric acid and Hs- CRP level.
Figure 1Distribution of cognitive impairment severity at 90 days stratified by the quartile of total white blood cell (WBC) count. There was a significant difference between total WBC count in the overall distribution of severity of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) (p = 0.012). After adjustment for the same variable in model 2, the ordinal regression analyses showed a significant association between total WBC count and PSCI severity [fourth quartile vs. first quartile, odd ratio (OR), 3.25; 95% CI 1.68–6.27, p < 0.001].
Figure 2The mediation analysis by leukoaraiosis (LA) of the association between the total WBC count and cognitive impairment [(A) for PSCI; (B) for PSCI severity]. (a) Regression coefficient of the association between total WBC count and cognitive impairment; (b) the regression coefficient of the association between LA and cognitive impairment, using total WBC count and LA as independent variables; (c) regression coefficient of the association between total WBC count and cognitive impairment; (c′) regression coefficient of the association between total WBC count and cognitive impairment, using total WBC count and leukoaraiosis as independent variables. The percentage difference of the coefficients (1–c/c′) is shown.