| Literature DB >> 35185338 |
A M Masudul Azad Chowdhury1, Kazi Nayeem Uddin1.
Abstract
The use of antibiotics on a regular and excessive basis is a major factor in the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Patients discharge un-metabolized or relatively low doses of non-metabolized antibiotics through urine and stool, which might enter into the environment through sewage disposal and promote the emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. This study is designed to investigate how excessive use of antibiotics in the hospital sector and their release into hospital wastes contribute to the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in different environmental settings. In this study, liquid hospital waste was collected from the sewage of Chittagong Medical College Hospital (CMCH), Bangladesh as well as from its distribution position in Chittagong city, Bangladesh. A total of 5 samples were collected from different positions in Chittagong city, including CMCH liquid waste. After collection, total bacteria and total cefixime resistant bacteria were counted by the total viable count (TVC) method. The result of bacteriological enumeration showed that a high magnitude of cefixime-resistant bacteria were available in all the hospital's associated waste samples. The highest proportion of cefixime resistant bacteria (23.35%) was found in sample 2, whereas 17.4%, 7.6%, 5%, and 1.32% were found in samples 1, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The total number of cefixime-resistant bacteria decreased with the increase in distance between the sample collection site and the hospital drain. This means that resistant bacteria developed in the hospital effluent are transferred to the environmental distribution sites.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteria; antibiotic resistance; cefixime; hospital waste
Year: 2022 PMID: 35185338 PMCID: PMC8854227 DOI: 10.1177/11786361221078211
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Insights ISSN: 1178-6361
Figure 1.Survey of antibiotics prescribed to 100 patients at the CMCH Surgery and Gynecology ward: Prescriptions of patients admitted to surgery and gynecology wards were recorded and analyzed. Cefixime was prescribed to 44% of the total patient population.
Figure 2.Location of the samples around Chittagong city, Bangladesh Sample 1: Sample 1 was collected from the 27-no. septic tank of CMCH in which surgery patients’ discharges (stools, urine, etc.) were deposited. The sample was a liquid portion of stool and other discharges. Sample 2: Sample 2 was collected from the position where hospital drains mixed with the outside drain (the drain by which hospital waste is distributed into different drains). The sample-2 was mainly drain water, consisting of all septic tank effluents of CMCH. Sample 2 was more diluted than sample 1. Sample 3: Sample 3 was collected from the large drain, which was situated in front of the Passport Office and the backside of the United Nations Park in Chittagong, Bangladesh. This drain was connected with the hospital’s outside drain through various small drains. Sample 3 was more diluted than sample 2. Sample 4: Sample 4 was collected from the large drain (Chawkbazar drain, Chittagong city) where hospital waste-containing drain was mixed with the Baharddarhat drain and the old Cakthai canal. It was situated in Fulthala, in western Bakolia. The sample-4 was diluted hospital waste, including most of the waste of the city. This drain ultimately falls into the Karnaphuli River through the Cakthai canal. Sample 5: Sample 5 was collected from an agricultural land that was situated beside the WAPDA Office in Eastern Bakolia to find resistance bacteria in agricultural soil. Since the land uses wastewater from the Chawkbazar drain situated beside it for irrigation purposes, there is a possibility of disseminating resistant bacteria in agricultural soil from the Chawkbazar drain that contains hospital effluents. Thus Waste water with soil from agricultural land was taken as sample-5.
Percentage of cefixime resistant bacteria in samples 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
| Sample number | TVC (Cfu/ml) | TVC (cfu/ml) | % of bacterial resistance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.12 × 10
| 3.69 × 10
| 17.40 |
| 2 | 1.88 × 10
| 4.39 × 10
| 23.35 |
| 3 | 9.03 ×10
| 6.86 × 10
| 7.60 |
| 4 | 9.93 × 10
| 4.97 × 10
| 5.00 |
| 5 | 4.07 × 10
| 5.37 × 10
| 1.32 |
Abbreviations: cfu, colony forming unit; µg, micro gram; ml, milliliter; TVC, total viable count; %, percentage.
Figure 3.Total viable count (TVC) before and after antibiotic treatment (50 µg/ml cefixime concentration). Representative photographs of some selected plates.
Bacterial counts of 5 samples at various cefixime concentrations (100-500 g/ml).
| Concentration of cefixime (µg/ml) | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Sample 4 | Sample 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 21.71 × 10
| 39.28 × 10
| 9.85 × 10
| 8.41 × 10
| 3.44 × 10
|
| 150 | 10.36 × 10
| 17.33 × 10
| 8.14 × 10
| 7.32 × 10
| NP |
| 200 | 9.20 × 10
| 14.18 × 10
| 7.90 × 10
| 6.16 × 10
| 2.77 × 10
|
| 250 | 8.48 × 10
| 9.57 × 10
| 6.52 × 10
| 5.22 × 10
| NP |
| 300 | 7.77 × 10
| 8.66 × 10
| 5.88 × 10
| 4.47 × 10
| 2.00 × 10
|
| 350 | 7.00 × 10
| 8.03 × 10
| 9.98 × 10
| 8.22 × 10
| NP |
| 400 | 6.16 × 10
| 7.15 × 10
| 8.36 × 10
| 7.24 × 10
| 2.00 × 10
|
| 450 | 5.32 × 10
| 6.30 × 10
| 6.75 × 10
| 4.66 × 10
| NP |
| 500 | 4.08 × 10
| 4.72 × 10
| 5.00 × 10
| 3.03 × 10
| 5.33 × 10
|
Abbreviations: cfu, colony forming unit; µg, micro gram; ml, milliliter; NP, not performed; TVC, total viable count.